|
MAIN PAGE
> Back to contents
Philosophy and Culture
Reference:
Prokhorov M.M.
Being and/or mystification
// Philosophy and Culture.
2016. № 5.
P. 629-649.
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0757.2016.5.18515 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=18515
Бытие и/или мистификация?
Prokhorov Mikhail Mikhailovich
Doctor of Philosophy
Professor, the department of History, Philosophy, Pedagogy and Psychology, Nizhny Novgorod State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering; Professor, Shuya Branch of Ivanovo State University
603053, Russia, Nizhegorodskaya oblast', g. Nizhnii Novgorod, ul. Il'inskaya, 65, kab. 223
|
mmpro@mail.ru
|
|
 |
Other publications by this author
|
|
|
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0757.2016.5.18515
Received:
28-03-2016
Published:
30-06-2016
Abstract:
The subject of this research is being and its reproduction in various worldview forms, ant/or its mystification. The research is divided into four key problems. The first one is the combination of being and its mystification on the example of the works of V. A. Kutyrev: recognizing being, he denies the ontological meaning of dialectics which represents a so-called second layer in determination of being, expressing it in the system of universal categories that form an “attributive model of any object”. The second – is an analysis of the attempts of imagining “technologization” (emerging from theory into practice technocratic reasoning) as an exit beyond the boundaries of posing and solution of the main question of philosophy. The third – is the examination of differences in the foundations of mythological, religious, and philosophical beliefs, which determine the specificity of each of the stated forms, predestining their ability or inability towards reproduction of the characteristics of being, in other words their mystification. The fourth one restores the ontological content of procedural categories and their methodological importance. Special attention is given to the principle of unity of the historical and the logical. The author believes that currently the fundamental values of dialectical-materialistic methodology are put behind by the conjuncture circumstances, the applied value of the falling under the authority of the capital and officialdom of knowledge, which becomes a commodity. Scientific novelty is characteristic to all four parts of the article and consists in the following: The ontological content of dialectics as a second layer in determination of being becomes restored; history of humanity is considered to be the third level of determination of being in its highest form; The philosophical foundations of technologization and technocratic thinking, shifting from the theoretical level into practical level are being defined; An analysis of the qualitative differences within the foundations of mythological, religious, and philosophical outlook is being presented. The connection of technologization with the religious and idealistic beliefs, enclosed in the principle of transcendence, is being revealed.
Keywords:
being, mystification, technologization, mythological, religious, philosophical, dialectic of irreversibility, comparison, transcendental idealism, post-modernism
References
1. V.A. Kutyrev. Kul'tura i tekhnologiya: bor'ba mirov. M.: Progress-Traditsiya, 2001. 240 s.
2. Prokhorov M.M. Paradoksy deyatel'nosti // Vestnik Rossiiskogo filosofskogo obshchestva. № 1 (25), 2003. S. 23-29.
3. Materialisticheskaya dialektika: v 5 tt. T. 1. Ob''ektivnaya dialektika. M.: Mysl', 1981. S. 96-99.
4. Golenkov S.I. Kontseptsiya razlichiya Zh. Deleza // Konev V.A. Transtsendental'nyi empirizm Zhilya Deleza. Samara: Samarskii universitet, 2001. S.26-33.
5. Delez Zh. Povtorenie i razlichie. SPb: Petropolis, 1998. 384 s.
6. Mezhuev V.M. Istoricheskaya teoriya Marksa i sovremennost' // Filosofskoe soznanie: dramatizm obnovleniya. M.: Politizdat, 1991. S. 279-305.
7. Kutyrev V. A. Bytie ili nichto. SPb: Aleteiya, 2009. 496 s.
8. Lenin V.I. Filosofskie tetradi // Lenin V.I. Poln. sobr. soch. T. 29. S. 326.
9. Gegel' G.V.F. Entsiklopediya filosofskikh nauk. T. 1. Nauka logiki. M.: Izd-vo sotsial'no-ekonomicheskoi literatury, 1974. S. 424.
10. Prokhorov M.M. Istoriya i bytie. Issledovanie filosofskikh osnovanii. N. Novgorod: NGPU, 2013. S. 180-197.
11. Kuznetsov V.N. Problema znacheniya ponyatii «materialisty i materializm» v novoevropeiskoi filosofii XVII-XVIII vekov // Istoriko-filosofskii al'manakh. Vyp. 2. M., 2007. S. 55.
12. Engel's F. Lyudvig Feierbakh i konets klassicheskoi nemetskoi filosofii. M.: Politizdat, 1967. 70 s.
13. Kutyrev V. A. Poslednee tselovanie. Chelovek kak traditsiya. SPb: Aleteiya, 2015. 312 s.
14. Kutyrev V.A. O soyuze filosofii s religiei protiv svobody nauchnogo razuma // Kutyrev V.A. Estestvennoe i iskusstvennoe: bor'ba mirov. N. Novgorod: Izd-vo «N. Novgorod», 1994. «Vmesto zaklyucheniya». S. 196-199.
15. Petrov V.M. Osnovy sotsial'nogo gosudarstva. N. Novgorod: NNGASU, 2012. 551 s.
16. Prokhorov M.M. Obshchestvo – ekonomika – ekonomizm // Filosofskaya mysl'.-2014.-№ 1.-S.113-163. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2014.1. 10630. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/fr/article_10630.html.;
17. Prokhorov M.M. Ekonomizm kak modal'nost' beschelovechnosti // Mirovozzrencheskaya paradigma v filosofii: Modusy i modal'nosti prakticheskie i teoreticheskie: Monografiya / Pod red. prof. M.M. Prokhorova. Nizhnii Novgorod: NF FGBOU VPO MESI, 2014. S. 188-210.
18. Nikiforov A.L. Chto takoe «postneklassicheskaya nauka»? // Epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki. 2013. T. XXXVI, № 2, s. 63-64.
19. Losev A.F. Platonovskii ob''ektivnyi idealizm i ego tragicheskaya sud'ba // Platon i ego epokha. K 2400-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya. M.: Nauka, 1979. S. 9-57.
20. Ortega-i-Gasset Kh. Vokrug Galileya (skhema krizisov) // Ortega-i-Gasset Kh. Izbrannye trudy. M.: Ves' mir, 1997. 233-403 s.
21. Losev A.F. Estetika Vozrozhdeniya. M.: Mysl', 1978. S. 138-143.
22. Chanyshev A.N. Kurs lektsii po drevnei filosofii. M.: Vysshaya shkola, 1981. 374 s.
23. Dionisii Areopagit. Korpus sochinenii s tolkovaniyami prep. Maksima Ispovednika. SPb, 2010. S. 409-411.
24. Mamardashvili M.K. Strela poznaniya (nabrosok estestvennoistoricheskoi gnoseologii). M.: Yazyki russkoi kul'tury, 1997. 304 s.
25. Arsen'ev V.K. Izbrannye proizvedeniya. Khabarovsk: Knizhnoe izdatel'stvo, 1997. T. 1. 656 s.
26. Marks K., Engel's F. Soch. T. 46. Ch. 1. S. 47.
27. Golosovker E.Ya. Logika mifa. M.: Nauka, 1987. 216 s.
28. Arnobii. Protiv yazychnikov. SPb: Izd-vo SPbGU, 2008. 398 s.
29. Bekon F. Sochineniya v dvukh tomakh. T. 1. M.: Mysl', 1971. 590 s.
30. Zinov'ev A.A. Ideologiya partii budushchego. M.: Eksmo, 2003. S. 240.
31. Khyubner B. Martin Khaidegger – oderzhimyi bytiem. SPb.: Akademiya issledovaniya kul'tury, 2011. 171 s.
32. Gadamer Kh.-G. Istina i metod. Osnovy filosofskoi germenevtiki. M.: Progres, 1988. 704.
33. Prokhorov M.M. Smysly i tsennost' modeli otnosheniya cheloveka s mirom // Filosofskaya mysl'. - 2013. - 7. - C. 136 - 240. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8728.2013.7.369. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_369.html
34. Gurevich P.S. Igra kak odna iz granei chelovecheskogo bytiya // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika. - 2014. - 8. - C. 789 - 792. DOI: 10.7256/2070-8955.2014.8.12501.
35. Gryaznova E.V. Filosofskii analiz kontseptsii virtual'noi real'nosti // Filosofskaya mysl'. - 2013. - 4. - C. 53 - 82. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8728.2013.4.278. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_278.html
36. E.A. Popov Konstitutsii mira – tsennosti tsivilizatsii // Pravo i politika. - 2013. - 2. - C. 162 - 168. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.02.1.
Link to this article
You can simply select and copy link from below text field.
|
|
