MAIN PAGE
> Back to contents
Philosophy and Culture
Reference:
Beskrovnayia L.V.
Truth in art: hermeneutic in visual art
// Philosophy and Culture.
2017. № 1.
P. 98-105.
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0757.2017.1.18369 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=18369
Истина в искусстве: герменевтическое в изобразительном искусстве
Beskrovnayia Liudmila Vyacheslavovna
Post-graduate student, the department of Social Communications, National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University
634050, Russia, Tomsk, Prospekt Lenina 30
|
blv82@yandex.ru
|
|
|
Other publications by this author |
|
|
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0757.2017.1.18369
Received:
16-03-2016
Published:
10-03-2017
Abstract:
This article present an interpretation of M. Heidegger’s thesis “The Origin of the Work of Art”. Being a part of the world and having originated from it, art was always a topic of interest for the philosophers, who try to find answers to the questions “Is there truth in art?” and “How to understand the works of visual art? The author finds the key to the mystery of art in polemics of the prominent art historian M. Shapiro and philosopher M. Heidegger. In this dispute, the notions of the truth and existence (ontological field) are counterpoised to the historical and biographical details of createdness of the painting. The subject of dispute lies in Van Gogh’s painting “A Pair of Shoes”. In interpretation of the painting, M. Heidegger analyzes how it reveals the nature of the shoes. And, thanks to the rich imagination, audience through the creation of an art work, reveals the truth. Trying on the country woman’s shoes, the audience pictures her being; and the artist attempt to attract attention and cognize the truth with help of the createdness. M. Shapiro focuses attention on the historical component of the paintings and biographical motives of the artist. It originates a question, which of the aspects, namely, visual documental information or art (associations, feelings, emotions, projections) are closer to the ontological understanding of the painting as a painting. The author concludes that if a creative component is present, it moves the biographical motives and historical details to the background. Ontological understanding of the painting is possible only in aesthetic field.
Keywords:
aesthetics, hermeneutics, being, truth, work of art, earth, world, createdness, historical context, visual art
References
1. Khaidegger M. Istok khudozhestvennogo tvoreniya. M.: Akademicheskii Proekt, 2008. 528 s.
2. Crowther P. Phenomenologies of Art and Vision: A Post-Analytic Turn. Bloomsbury, 2013. 195r.
3. Shapiro M. Natyurmort kak lichnyi ob''ekt: zametki o Khaideggere i Van Goge (1968) // Topos. 2001. № 2-3 (5). S. 28-39.
4. Stepanenko S. B. Istina v slovesnom tvorenii: k voprosu o germenevtiko-fenomenologicheskom ponyatii literatury // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2006. №291. S.135-144.
5. Gadamer G.-G. Aktual'nost' prekrasnogo/Per. s nem. M.: Iskusstvo, 1991. 367 s.
6. Khudozhestvenno-istoricheskii muzei [Elektronnyi resurs] URL: http://smallbay.ru/artreness/da_vinci06.html (data obrashcheniya 25.12.2016).
7. Zhizn' i tvorchestvo Van Goga [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: http://www.bibliotekar.ru/isk/5.htm
8. E.M. Antonova Pereotsenka poeticheskogo slova. Martin Khaideger i «poeticheskoe myshlenie» // Filologiya: nauchnye issledovaniya. - 2013. - 1. - C. 36 - 42. DOI: 10.7256/2305-6177.2013.01.5.
Link to this article
You can simply select and copy link from below text field.
|