Статья 'Превозможение человека' - журнал 'Философия и культура' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Philosophy and Culture
Reference:

Превозможение человека

Gurevich Pavel Semenovich

head of the division at Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences

109240, Russia, g. Moscow, ul. Goncharnaya, 12, str. 1, of. -

gurevich@rambler.ru
Other publications by this author
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0757.2016.2.17597

Received:

15-01-2016


Published:

17-03-2016


Abstract: This article reviews a remarkable monography by V. I. Samokhvalova “Superhuman: image, metaphor, and program” (M., 2015), in which the author based on the significant philosophical material attempts to substantiate Nietzsche’s idea of Übermensch (superhuman). This problem is examined in traditional doctrines, various religious systems, myths, and modern cultural perceptions. It is evident that this topic has an outstanding background story, but at the same time it attained many stereotypes, free interpretations, and various meanings. Today, the notion of superhuman could be understood very differently – from the idea of perfection of a human, all the way until human brain replacement with a silicon chip. The author bases on an extensive philosophical tradition, including the modern transhumanism, and also applies hermeneutic method that allows revealing hidden meanings in the well-known philosophical texts. Even recently, with regards to a human, we could hear exceptionally funeral motifs. Philosophers were ecstatically describing the human demise not only as a topic of philosophical anthropology, but also as a flickering anthropological given. Human died not only as an animal, but also as a historical creature, human dissolved in everything that surrounding him – nature, society, technologies. However, the topic of a living, bodily, and almost immortal human gradually became evident in even post-modernistic philosophy.


References
1. Shichanina Yu.V. Chelovek «inomernyi». Paradoksy antropologicheskoi mery. Rostov-na-Donu: Izd-vo Rost. ped. u-ta, 2006. S. 3.
2. Belyaev D.A. Istoriya opredeleniya sverkhcheloveka. Lipetsk: LGPU, 2016. 186 s.
3. Samokhvalova V.I. Sverkhchelovek: obraz, metafora, programma. M.: Vash format, 2015. S. 19, 24, 33, 62, 275, 284.
4. Lyusyi A.P., Nilogov A.S. Tekstologicheskaya kontseptsiya russkoi kul'tury (beseda A.P. Lyusova i A.S. Nilogova) // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2015. № 11. S. 1699–1723.
5. Sineokaya Yu.V. Problema sverkhcheloveka u Solov'eva i Nitsshe // Voprosy filosofii. 2002. № 2. S. 43–60.
6. Sineokaya Yu.V. Rubezh vekov: russkaya sud'ba Sverkhcheloveka Nitsshe // Fridrikh Nitsshe i filosofiya v Rossii: sb. st. SPb.: RKhGI, 1999. S. 58–74.
7. Sineokaya Yu.V. Filosofiya Nitsshe i dukhovnyi opyt Rossii (konets XIX – nachalo XXI vekov): Diss. … dokt. filos. nauk. M., 2009
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.