|
MAIN PAGE
> Back to contents
Philosophy and Culture
Reference:
Katsapova I.A.
Globalization and National Identity: the Point of Intersection (Philosophical and Legal Aspects)
// Philosophy and Culture.
2015. № 11.
P. 1724-1733.
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0757.2015.11.14950 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=14950
Глобализация и национальные идеи: вектор пересечения (философско-правовой аспект)
Katsapova Irina Anatol'evna
PhD in Philosophy
senior researcher at Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences
109240, Russia, Moscow, str. Goncharnaya, 12, bld. 1, of. 202
|
katsapova@gmail.com
|
|
|
Other publications by this author |
|
|
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0757.2015.11.14950
Received:
07-04-2015
Published:
17-01-2016
Abstract:
This article is devoted to very important contemporary problems, i.e. international relations, legal relations at the level of international law and universal values. The author analyzes the concept of the global community from the point of view of universal values and human rights. She also proves that nowadays we are experiencing the crisis of the political and legal sphere including the crisis of legal and legislative state policies through the shaken balance between the supremecy of law and legislation. The author of the article suggests that we should return to philosophical and legal problems including the so-called national idea and view these problems in a different light as the human right to a decent existence. The main methodological principle used by the author of the research is the combination of legal and philosophical approaches to the problems of law and legal reality as well as the historical method. The author of the article views modern civilizational processes from the point of view of philosophy and legal studies which is apparently not only a topical issue but also a rather new and understudied topic. Modern practices of international development demonstrate the need for us to return to a very important branch of knowledge, philosophy of law, as an alternative to the technical approach to the law making and law enforcement processes established by today's legal science.
Keywords:
globalization, international relations, international law, human rights, the nation, the people, nation, the national idea, the political crisis, right, people
References
1. Riker P. Spravedlivoe. M.: GNOZISLOGOS, 2005. S. 15.
2. Katsapova I.A. Mezhkul'turnyi smysl etiko-yuridicheskogo printsipa P.Rikera «Ya-sam kak drugoi» // Pol' Riker: Chelovek – obshchestvo – tsivilizatsiya. M.: KANON+, 2015. 392 s. S. 338-363.
3. Katsapova I.A. Istoriya i sovremennost': o diskussii mezhdu B.N.Chicherinym i V.S.Solov'evym. M.: Filosofskie nauki, 2012. № 3. S. 40-52.
4. Mark vann Khuk. Pravo kak kommunikatsiya. SPb.: 2012. 288 s. S. 7.
5. Novgorodtsev P.I. Nravstvennyi idealizm v filosofii prava // Problemy idealizma. M.: 1902. S. 279.
6. Il'in I.A. O sushchnosti pravosoznaniya // Il'in I.A. Teoriya prava i gosudarstva. M.: 2008. S. 330.
7. Katsapova I.A. Filosofiya prava v publichnom prostranstve. M.: Filosofiya i kul'tura. № 12 (72), 2013. S. 1797-1811.
8. Leist O.E. Sushchnost' prava. Problemy teorii i filosofii prava. M.: 2008. S. 24.
9. Khart G.L.A. Ponyatie prava. SPb.: 2007. S. 26, 241.
10. Leoni B. Svoboda i zakon. M.: IRISEN, 2008. S. 25.
11. Dvorkin R. O pravakh vser'ez. M.: ROSSPEN, 2004.
12. Khaiek F.A. Pravo, Zakonodatel'stvo, svoboda. M.: IRISEN, 2006. S. 85.
13. Shchapov A. Soch. T. 3. SPb.: 1908. S. 6.
14. Dzhenis M., Kei R., Bredli E. Evropeiskoe pravo v oblasti prav cheloveka (Praktika i kommentarii). M.: «Prava cheloveka», 1997. S. 15.
15. Novgorodtsev P.I. Istoricheskaya shkola yuristov, ee proiskhozhdenie i sud'ba. SPb.: 1999. S. 20.
Link to this article
You can simply select and copy link from below text field.
|
|