|
MAIN PAGE
> Back to contents
Philosophy and Culture
Reference:
Toporina E.A.
Aesthetic Peculiarities of Artistic Interpretation of Russian Classical Literature
// Philosophy and Culture.
2015. № 12.
P. 1861-1866.
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0757.2015.12.14061 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=14061
Эстетические особенности художественной интерпретации русской классической литературы
Toporina Ekaterina Alekseevna
PhD in Philosophy
senior researcher of the Philosophical Faculty, Department of the History of Foreign Philosophy at Lomonosov Moscow State University
119991, Russia, Moscow, str. Lomonosovsky prospekt, 27, bld. 4
|
top-kate@yandex.ru
|
|
|
Other publications by this author |
|
|
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0757.2015.12.14061
Received:
21-12-2014
Published:
25-01-2016
Abstract:
The article is devoted to some peculiarities of interpreting Russian classical writings when they are being transferred to other art forms. Much attention is paid to cinematography. Toporina has described such peculiarities as specific nature of the literary, cinema- and theatrical languages, the problem of defining the artistic interpretation (transfer), style, detail, national literary tradition, aesthetic component of a literary writing, problems of traditionalism and novelty as well as the role of personality in Russian literature. These peculiarities are defined through analyzing particular materials, i.e. modern artistic interpretations of Russian classical literary works. When writing her article, Toropina has appealed to classical fiction as well as literary, aesthetical and philosophical researches devoted to the problems of theoretical and artistic interpretation of texts. Conclusions: the researcher shows special features of a classical text as a source of active creative understanding in an artistic intepretation; describes peculiarities of artistic interpretation of classical literature as the way to convey the deepest meanings of classical literature through other artistic forms; examines peculiarities of artistic interpretation of Russian classical literature based on the analysis of particular artwork; attempts to analyze whether modern interpetations of classical literature are adequate.
References
1. Shlegel' F. Estetika. Filosofiya. Kritika. T.2. M., 1983. S.294.
2. Averintsev S.S. Glubokie korni obshchnosti// Sov. Muzyka, 1988. №11, S.76-83.
3. Volkova E.V. Proizvedenie iskusstva v mire khudozhestvennoi kul'tury. M., 1988. S.129-130.
4. Tarkovskii A.A. Lektsii po kinorezhissure: Stsenarii /Uroki rezhissury. M.,1993.S.19-20.
5. Chekhov A.P. Povesti i rasskazy. M., 1997. S 261.
6. O. Mandel'shtam. O prirode slova//Esteticheskoe samosoznanie russkoi kul'tury: 20-e gody XX veka. Antologiya. Sostavitel' G.A. Belaya. M., 2003. S.167.
7. Pushkin A.S. Pis'mo P.A. Vyazemskomu ot 4 noyabrya 1823 g.// Sobranie sochinenii v 10t. M., 1962. T.9. S.77.
8. Azarova N.M. Tekst. Chast' I. M., 2002. S. 206.
9. Tynyanov Yu.N. Pushkin i ego sovremenniki. M., 1969. S.158.
10. Nabokov V.V. Kommentarii k romanu «Evgenii Onegin». SPb., 1998. S. 593.
11. Bakhtin M.M. Estetika slovesnogo tvorchestva. [Elektronnyi resurs] /M., 1979. Dostupno po adresu: http://teatr-lib.ru/Library/Bahtin/esthetic/. Data obrashcheniya: 25.09.2014.
12. Frank S.L. S nami Bog // Frank S. L. Dukhovnye osnovy obshchestva. M., S. 304.
13. Sm. Pechko L.P. Stili iskusstva: esteticheskie konteksty. Elets, 2010.
14. Gacheva A.G. «Nam ne dano predugadat', Kak slovo nashe otzovetsya…»: (Dostoevskii i Tyutchev). M., 2004. S.6.
15. Rudnev V.P. Slovar' kul'tury XX veka. M., 1997. S. 253.
16. Stepanyan K.A. Yavlenie i dialog v romanakh F.M. Dostoevskogo. SPb., 2009. S.16.
17. Ganiyants Mariya «Fil'm Sergeya Ovcharova «Sad» po p'ese Chekhova predstavili v Moskve» RIA Novosti, Moskva, 29 oktyabrya 2008.
18. Shpet G.G. Esteticheskie fragmenty. [Elektronnyi resurs]. Dostupno po adresu:ModernLib.Ru.http://modernlib.ru/books/shpet_g/esteticheskie_fragmenti/read/. Data obrashcheniya: 26.09.2014.
Link to this article
You can simply select and copy link from below text field.
|
|