Статья 'Мотив удивления в творчестве Г. К. Честертона' - журнал 'Litera' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Litera
Reference:

The motive of astonishment in the work of G. K. Chesterton

Porinets Yurii Yur'evich

PhD in Pedagogy

Associate Professor of the Department of Foreign Literature at Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia

191186, Russia, g. Saint Petersburg, ul. Nab. R. Moiki, 48

porinets2015@yandex.ru
Other publications by this author
 

 

DOI:

10.25136/2409-8698.2022.8.38664

EDN:

UKREJL

Received:

24-08-2022


Published:

03-09-2022


Abstract: The article examines in detail the significance of the astonishment in the work of G. K. Chesterton. In literary studies, this aspect of his work has never been considered in detail. The research material was essays, short stories, literary biographies, novels and treatises of the English writer. The interrelation of astonishment with the motives of miracle, joy, love, paradise is shown. In connection with the motive of astonishment, the author touches on the paradox technique, which is significant for the author. The polemic of Chesterton with modern literature, in particular, with the literature of realism, is investigated. The motive of astonishment is revealed in detail in the article on the example of the novels "The Return of Don Quixote" and "The Man is Alive". In the work of G. K. Chesterton, the motif of astonishment is one of the central ones. It is inextricably linked with the motive of the miracle. The world for the writer is a miracle, acutely experienced in comparison with non-existence. Surprise at the world is an integral part of Chesterton's worldview, which he himself called "the fairy godmother's philosophy." For Chesterton, not only extraordinary things are amazing, but also ordinary things. His characters, discovering the familiar world anew, share their perception with others. The newly found world is often revealed through love, which is inextricably linked in Chesterton's work with the motive of astonishment.


Keywords:

astonishment, motive, miracle, novel, realism, essay, the treatise, joy, plot, the paradox

This article is automatically translated. You can find original text of the article here.

The motif of surprise is one of the central motifs in the work of G. K. Chesterton. The question of the meaning of this motif in the artistic world of the writer in literary studies was only partially touched upon (for example, in the works of N. L. Trauberg and E. V. Vasilyeva), but was not considered in detail.

The very word "surprise" is repeatedly found in the works of Chesterton. It is present in his treatises ("Orthodoxy", "Eternal Man"), literary biographies ("Charles Dickens"), numerous essays, short stories and novels of the writer. Obviously, Chesterton attaches special importance to it. The face of Rosamund Hunt in the novel "The Man is Alive" bears "the imprint of the most childish surprise" [1, p. 37]. With "childish surprise" [2, p. 292] Gail asks her question in the story "Ruby Light". When the heroine of the story "The Evil Fate of the Darnway family" sees Harry Payne, it is said about her that "the surprise that lit up on her face made this face even more amazing" [3, p. 495]. In the book about Dickens, Chesterton speaks of the "sacred gift of surprise" [4, p. 82]. The writer notes that Dickens' Pickwick has enough "humanity to wander and wonder" [4, p. 65]. The word surprise stands for the writer on a par with the word "joy. In the essay "A few words about simplicity" he writes: "Only one simplicity is worth the effort – the simplicity of the heart, the simplicity of surprise and praise" [5, p. 284].

In the treatise "Orthodoxy" Chesterton calls "the need to be surprised" an "ancient instinct" [6, p. 318]. Elsewhere in this treatise, the writer speaks of "an innate sense of interest and amazement" [6, p. 319]. Thus, it can be argued that for Chesterton, the feeling of surprise is one of the most important in a person, it is inherent in him from the beginning. It is thanks to surprise that a person can rejoice in what is happening in the world, feel alive and renewed. "And the strongest of them is the feeling that life is as precious as it is amazing. Life is beautiful because it is an adventure; life is an adventure because it is a chance" [6, p. 320], Chesterton writes. The feeling of surprise connects a person with the world, reveals to him the true essence of the universe and himself. "Once or twice in his life, a person sees the world from the outside, and feels life itself as an untapped adventure" [7, p. 126], says the novel "The Ball and the Cross". According to E. V. Vasilyeva, Chesterton's work is permeated with "surprise and delight" [8, p. 133].

The motive of surprise is inextricably linked for Chesterton with the motive of a miracle. They are virtually impossible for a writer without each other. Speaking about his childhood, Chesterton claims that "everything about him was a miracle" [9, p. 31]. "I always felt that everything in the world is a miracle, because everything is wonderful; then I realized that everything is a miracle in the stricter sense of the word: a certain will causes everything again and again. In short, I have always felt that there is magic in the world; now I have felt that there is a wizard in the world" [6, p. 328]. Thus, it is obvious that surprise is connected for Chesterton with a religious Revelation. Surprise returns simplicity, meaning to the world and brings happiness. Everything in the universe is amazing and wonderful. The world is wonderful because "we will never invent it; even the thought of it would seem silly or too beautiful to us. Our world is the best of impossible worlds" [4, p. 177], – the writer claims.

 From Chesterton's point of view, the world is not something that can be questioned. For him, life is a "pleasant surprise" [6, p. 320], a gift, an "amazing gift" [6, p. 323], "everything in the world is amazing" [6, p. 350]. Chesterton himself calls his vision of the world "the fairy godmother's philosophy" [6, p. 323]. His worldview is often called, as he called Dickens' worldview, "the philosophy of joy" [4, p. 177]. As S. S. Averintsev writes, Chesterton believes that "being is good not because it is going for the better, but because it opposes non-existence, and no matter how the battle ends, it is necessary to gratefully accept its risk, its indecision, its unpredictability, which, as already mentioned, is associated with freedom of human choice" [10, p. 331]. In the words of Chesterton himself, "Everything is fine compared to nothing" [9, p. 68].

E. V. Vasilyeva reasonably believes: "It can be argued that Chesterton's "philosophy of joy", which presupposes the wonderfulness of the world and joyful surprise and gratitude of a person in relation to being, is realized in the artistic picture of the writer's world" [11, p. 104]. The main character of the novel "The Man who was Thursday", Syme, facing the threat of death, keenly feels the beauty of the world. Later, having already woken up from his dream, having experienced his fantastic adventure and having already learned to wonder at the world, he "felt that he had found unimaginably good news, next to which everything becomes insignificant and precious in its insignificance" [12, p. 258]. The feeling of gratitude for being incredibly alive is also experienced by Father Mikhail in the novel "The Ball and the Cross". The same condition is experienced by Dr. Eames in the novel "The Man is Alive" in the scene when Smith threatens him with a revolver. The fashionable poet Dorian Wimpole in the novel "The Migratory Tavern", finding himself in an unusual situation, alone in the forest, experiences the same feeling.

Chesterton believes that modern man has lost his identity, people have lost their sense of the reality of the world, the ability to be surprised, to enjoy every day as a new one.  This is one of the manifestations of the disease of modernity. In the novel "The Return of Don Quixote", the disease of the world is called "blindness to colors" [13, p. 58]. "If a person has lost his surprise, he must be treated, and in a completely different way (...) Whatever the cause, he is blind" [14, p. 110], writes Chesterton. In "The Eternal Man" it is said that "it is necessary to return to him (the man – Yu. P.) childish simplicity and childish surprise – that realism, that objectivity, which is not without innocence" [14, p. 109]. The description of Innocent Smith's belongings is accompanied by a comment that he is "truly a child", "a baby" [1, p. 22]. The closeness to childhood is emphasized by Chesterton in other characters (Father Brown, Professor Green, Father Michael, Makien, Dr. Bull and others). It is no exaggeration to say that a character similar to a child is found in almost every work of the writer. Childhood and surprise are closely linked in Chesterton's work. It is important for him that the child is surprised by things that are in their places, perceives the world with credulity, accepts the world as it is.

The writer believes that in order to return such a vision of the world, "in order to become impartial in a sane, the only true sense of the word, it is necessary to see everything anew" [14, p. 109]. In the novels of the writer, the plot repeats itself, in which the characters, faced with something unexpected that does not fit into their usual ideas about the world, are surprised by what is happening and experience a strong shock. Heroes change, abandon false ideas about the world, as a result of which the world is transformed for them. This can be called a breakthrough to true being, the world really takes on true outlines for the characters.

  Chesterton's heroes, who have realized the amazing properties of the world, strive to share this vision with others, to pass it on to others. Dorian Wimpole renounces modernist creativity and begins, together with Patrick Dalroy and Humphrey Pump, to compose ballads in which he glorifies simple, natural things (the beauty of the world, love, friendship, feasts). Syme generously shares his thoughts about the world with friends found in the process of adventure. Father Mikhail saves all the characters in the finale of the novel "The Ball and the Cross". "I will walk through the world like an accidental miracle – I will fly carelessly like a tumbleweed, appear silently like the rising sun, flash suddenly like a spark, and disappear without a trace, like a silent marshmallow. (...) I will point the muzzle of a revolver at the forehead of a Modern Man. But not in order to kill him, and then to bring him back to life" [1, p. 85], – says Innocent Smith in the novel "The Man is Alive". In this novel, the reader is presented with a description of the playing world, a world that laughs, that smiles. Chesterton depicts a world that is becoming, a world that seems to be born before our eyes, in which everything is changing places.  It is no coincidence that when Inglewood sees Rosamund's tears, it seems to him "as if heaven and earth have changed places, the ceiling has become the sea, and the floor is dotted with stars. It is impossible to convey in words how it amazed him" [1, p. 40].

Chesterton is trying to give the reader back the opportunity to see things as they are. It becomes possible to do this if you try to see the world as if you had never seen it before, abandoning the usual view of things. As L. V. Sum writes: "After seeing a detail in a new combination, we will finally understand how important this detail itself is" [15, p. 198]. It is for the sake of achieving such an effect that Chesterton uses the paradox technique, which can be rightfully called central to his artistic work [16-17]. Although N. L. Trauberg's clarification that "Chesterton is paradoxical not only because he wanted to wake up the reader with surprise" [18, p. 19] is legitimate. With the help of a paradox, the writer tries to overcome the apparent contradictions of this world. The world seen paradoxically appears to be a world of order and harmony. "Amazing things" led Chesterton, in his words, to the recognition that "one must love the world without relying on it; rejoice in the world without merging with it. I learned that Christians have a personal God and that He created a world separate from himself" [6, p. 349]. The collections "Hunting stories", "Paradoxes of Mr. Pond" and "The Club of Amazing Crafts" and others are based on the reception of the paradox. In the stories included in these cycles, unexpected things happen, overturning stereotypical ideas about the world, returning clarity of vision and judgment to the characters, revealing the true world to them.

In the novel "The Man is Alive", the characters, under the influence of Smith, first ascended to the roof, see the world from a different point of view. They experience feelings of wonder. It seems to them that they have found themselves in eternity, which they perceive as nonsense, "nonsense, confusion", "that they are in the radiance of bright and radiant ignorance, which was the beginning of all beliefs" [1, p. 24]. Innocent Smith's first appearance in this novel coincides with the description of the raging elements, the "winged whirlwind" [1, p. 8]. Like the wind, the hero brings renewal to the lives of the heroes. The author emphasizes the absolute surprise of what is happening.  E. V. Vasilyeva rightly writes that Smith "with the help of representations-games frees moral concepts and principles from meaningless words that have lost their original meaning. An idea or principle, having turned into action, becoming life, acquires a lost, forgotten meaning, is born for a new life" [19, pp. 403-404]. Under the influence of Smith, the characters seem to wake up, abandon false ideas about the world, the real world opens up for them, which Michael Moon in the novel calls "the land of facts" [1, p. 39]. It can be argued that in Chesterton's novels, up to a certain point, the characters are in a state of inner sleep, a kind of stupor, which symbolically indicates their proximity to death. After the transformation that happens to them, the characters seem to begin to live a genuine life, a life that can never end, because it is inextricably linked with eternity.

Father Brown, the main character of Chesterton's series of detective stories, also performs incredible deeds that destroy stereotypical ideas about the world and about people. His actions and way of thinking surprise those who encounter him, his vision of the world opens up the world to other characters anew. Where a priest appears who seems to be the embodiment of the ordinary, something unheard of happens. And he himself is called "an amazing priest" in the story "Robber's Paradise" [20, p. 208], and in the story "The Evil Fate of the Darnway family" – "an amazing man" [3, p. 496].

For Chesterton, it's not just the unexpected, the amazing, the unheard of that is surprising. No less surprising for him is the ordinary, the familiar. It is characteristic that the writer wrote an essay "In defense of gray." Chesterton was convinced that "the ordinary is more valuable than the unusual, it is even more unusual" [6, p. 310]. In his paradoxical manner, Chesterton overturns the usual idea of Jourdain, who "learns with delight that he has been speaking prose all his life" [4, p. 67], does not agree with his author's ironic assessment. The writer admires the fact that the hero "had the simplicity to rejoice at an unknown piece of information, moreover, a piece of information that has been known for a long time" [4, pp. 67-68]. Everything that is in its place testifies to the harmony of the world, this is no less a miracle than what is commonly called supernatural. "Good is good, bad is bad, this is a miracle, inexplicable by any words" [1, p. 107]. For Chesterton, "duties and conventions are the surest way to see the grass green and the rose scarlet" [4, p. 68].  

The motive of surprise is connected in his work with the motive of love. Love always surprises the heroes. In the story "Colonel Cray's Salad" about lovers it says: "Brown did not hear the words, but their faces spoke of surprise, not sadness" [21, p. 315]. Love is shown by Chesterton as an epiphany. It is as if a phenomenon of another world is happening through it. Another person, seen in a new light, turns out to be an absolutely incredible miracle, and causes surprise. The writer is characterized by the image of love as a feeling that reveals to the heroes the miracle of the universe. Chesterton calls love "wonderful and unexpected" [6, p. 324]. "The earth was transformed" [13, p. 100] for the hero of the novel "The Return of Don Quixote", Herne, at the moment when he saw Rosamund in a new light. In fact, for Chesterton, it is the feeling of love that combines the ordinary and the extraordinary. In the novel "The Return of Don Quixote", love helps Hearn to see in the ordinary and typical from the point of view of a realistic novel Rosamund Severn a beautiful princess "both in a medieval dress and in a modern one" [13, p. 79]. Love as a feeling that rediscovers the world, associated with surprise and gratitude, is also revealed in other works of Chesterton ("The Ball and the Cross", "The Flying Tavern", "The Man who was Thursday", "The Man is Alive" and others).

When another character in the novel "The Return of Don Quixote", Merrel, sees Hendry's daughter for the second time, he sees her as if for the first time. The author, who has already described it earlier, notes: "The girl who looked out of the window appears in our story for the first time" [13, p. 66]. Later in the novel, it is said that the girl immediately liked Merrell, and therefore he saved her father from the madhouse. There is a visible contradiction in the novel here. Although it is overcome by the fact that this is not a realistic novel. It is no coincidence that it is at this moment that the author emphasizes this for the second time. For the first time, Chesterton contrasts his novel with the realistic one in the episode when Murrell tries to find the unique paint he needs in the supermarket. It is interesting to note that the author first says that he will not talk about this incident, and then gives a fairly detailed synopsis of the hero's conversation with the sales girl. The action is artificially delayed, nothing happens, the hero stops on the spot instead of continuing the search. If we consider Merrell's journey in the novel in search of paints as a kind of chivalrous feat, which is directly emphasized several times in the text (the hero himself is directly called a knight several times, he not only gets Dr. Hendry's paint with great difficulty, but also protects the artist himself from persecutors, generously bestows the owner of the cab and saves the "virgin in trouble"), then we can conclude that the episode in the supermarket is an ironic analogue of the knight's adventure in an enchanted castle, the time in which the hero seems to turn off during his stay there. Thus, the novel creates a sense of the routine of what is happening. Chesterton seems to offer the reader to familiarize himself with the content of the "boring" [13, p. 50] modern realistic novel, whose interest is focused exclusively in the field of social relations, the material sphere. Here the author, in his subjective manner, polemizes with modern literature, showing it somewhat one-sidedly, snatching from it those aspects that correspond to the subject of his polemic. The modern novel, as it appears in the text, is a boring, predictable work in which everything that pushes down seems "natural" [13, p. 66]. There is nothing to be surprised at in this world, exceptions and a happy ending are impossible. In Chesterton's novel, a completely different logic operates, events are not determined by anything. Despite the predictability of many plot twists, which Borges wrote about in connection with Chesterton's detective texts, and the fact that "a close reader" [22, p. 399] can guess the denouement much earlier than it is described, the novel is built on the principle of the impossible and amazing. The fact that the hero practically did not see the doctor's daughter, but he liked her so much that he is ready to perform a feat for her, does not contradict the internal logic of the narrative. It looks completely unrealistic, which is deliberately emphasized by the author. It is no coincidence that the text before this scene says: "When he turned the corner, a sunbeam cut through the steep street, weighty as the rays that cut through the weighty clouds in the old illustrations to the Bible" [13, p. 66]. Thus, the author points out that we are talking about the miraculous, and not about the plausible. The world that shines through this one comes into action. No wonder Chesterton writes that Dr. Hendry's release from the madhouse "symbolized a different freedom and a better, different world" [13, p. 66]. The text seems to include elements of medieval literature (mystery, knight's novel and other genres). This is quite correlated with the fact that throughout the novel the theme of the Middle Ages is actualized (a play about troubadours is played, much is said about the scientific literature devoted to this era, costumes are made for the performance, then the "revival" of the era begins in England, as a result of which a king appears, Merrell's journey is compared with a chivalrous feat).

Chesterton seems to expand the space of a modern realistic novel with the help of elements of a medieval narrative. Therefore, an impossible event, in fact a miracle described in the novel, is not perceived as something foreign and unprepared by the author. Miss Hendry, faced with an impossible event (the liberation of her father), rises above her life situation, life experience, as if she is freed from them, instantly ceases to be "pale as a plant", "shadow", she is no longer "shrouded in darkness", is not enclosed in the "cramped and dark house" [13, p. 66]. The heroine is amazed by a miracle, goes beyond the usual framework, forgetting about herself, and transformed, becomes beautiful. "She has long forgotten about her appearance and would be very surprised if she saw herself from the street now. However, she was surprised and looking at the street. Her beauty blossomed like a magic flower on the balcony not only because a ray of sunlight fell on her. She was decorated with what is most beautiful in the world; perhaps that is the only thing in the world that is beautiful. It was decorated with wonder, lost in Eden and found in heaven, where it is so strong that it does not fade away forever" [13, p. 66]. In this way, Chesterton combines the motives of surprise and love with another important motive of his work – the motive of paradise.

References
1. Chesterton, G. K. (1990). Manalive. In: The selected works of G. K. Chesterton in 3 vols. Vol.
2. Manalive. The Flying Inn. Stories (pp. 7-144). Moscow: Hudozhestvennaya literatura. 2. Chesterton, G. K. (1990). The Purple Jewel. In: The selected works of G. K. Chesterton in 3 vols.Vol.
3. The Return of Don Quixote. Stories. Poems (pp. 286-289). Moscow: Hudozhestvennaya literatura. 3. Chesterton, G. K. (2016). The Doom of the Darnaways. In: G. K. Chesterton. All of Father Brown's investigations (pp. 478-500). Moscow: Inostranka, Azbuka-Atttikus.
4. Chesterton, G. K. (1982). Charles Dickens. Moscow: Raduga.
5. Chesterton, G. K. (2000). On Sandals and Simplicity. In: The selected works of G. K. Chesterton in 5 vols. Vol. 5 (pp. 283-284). Saint-Petersburg: Amfora.
6. Chesterton, G. K. (2021). Orthodoxy. In: G. K. Chesterton. St. Thomas Aquinas. St. Francis of Assisi. Orthodoxy (pp. 263-446). Moscow: AST.
7. Chesterton, G. K. (2000). The Ball and the Cross. In: The selected works of G. K. Chesterton in 5 vols. Vol. 2 (pp. 5-144). Saint-Petersburg: Amfora.
8. Vasileva, E. V. (2015). Spiritual crisis at the turn of the 19th-20th centuries in the understanding of G.K. Chesterton. Spiritual crisis at the turn of the 19th-20th centuries in the understanding of G.K. Chesterton. Proceedings of the VSPU. Humanitarian sciences, 3(268), 130-134.
9. Chesterton, G. K. (2003). Autobiography. In: G. K. Chesterton. The Man with the Golden Key (pp. 9-224). Moscow: Kukushka.
10. Averincev, S. S. (1984). Gilbert Keith Chesterton, or the surprise of sanity. In: G. K. Chesterton. Writer in the newspaper. Artistic journalism (pp. 329-342). Moscow: Progress.
11. Vasileva, E. V. (2016). The symbolism of the garden in the novel by G. K. Chesterton «The Man Who Was Thursday». The Bulletin of the Perm University. Russian and foreign philology, Issue 1 (33), 100-105.
12. Chesterton, G. K. (1990). The Man Who Was Thursday. In: The selected works of G. K. Chesterton in 3 vols.Vol. 1. The Napoleon of Notting Hill. The Man Who Was Thursday. Stories (pp.145-260). Moscow.: Hudozhestvennaya literature.
13. Chesterton, G. K. (1990). The Return of Don Quixote. In: The selected works of G. K. Chesterton in 3 vols.Vol. 3. The Return of Don Quixote. Stories. Poems (pp. 7-124). Moscow: Hudozhestvennaya literature.
14. Chesterton, G. K. (2004). The Everlasting Man. In: G. K. Chesterton. The Everlasting Man (pp. 103-304). Moscow: Eksmo, Saint-Petersburg: Midgard.
15. Summ, L. V. (2010). « The Green Man»: Father Brown's puppet theater. In: Word and image. Pages: Theology, culture, education, Vol. 14, Issue 1, 97-112.
16. Borovinskaya, T. V. (2006). About the value of the ordinary: the concept of common in the essayistic works of G.K. Chesterton. In: Literature of the XX century: results and perspectives of the study. Materials of the Fourth Andreevsky Readings (University of the Russian Academy of Education, January 2006) (pp. 76-79). Moscow: Ekon-Inform.
17. Porinets, Y. Y. (2019). The Image of common people in G. K. Chestertons novels. Philology: scientific research, 5, 48-53. doi: 10.7256/2454-0749.2019.5.30920
18. Trauberg, N. L. (1990). The sermons and parables by Gilbert Keith Chesterton. In: G. K. Chesterton. The selected works in 3 vols. Vol. 1. The Napoleon of Notting Hill. The Man Who Was Thursday. Stories (pp. 5-20). Moscow.: Hudozhestvennaya literature.
19. Vasileva, E. V. (2022). «Playing» character in the novels of G. K. Chesterton. In: Modern language situation and improving the training of a philologist teacher. Materials of the International scientific and practical online conference dedicated to the 90th anniversary of the Voronezh State Pedagogical University (pp. 398-405). Voronezh: VSPU.
20. Chesterton, G. K. (2016). The Paradise of Thieves. In: G. K. Chesterton. All of Father Brown's investigations (pp. 204-215). Moscow: Inostranka, Azbuka-Atttikus.
21. Chesterton, G. K. (2016). The Salad of Colonel Cray. In: G. K. Chesterton. All of Father Brown's investigations (pp. 307-316). Moscow: Inostranka, Azbuka-Atttikus.
22. Borges, H. R. Chesterton. (2001). In: The selected works of H.R. Borges in 2 vols. Vol. 2 (pp. 394-399). Moscow: Amfora.

Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

The article presented for consideration "The motive of surprise in the work of G. K. Chesterton", proposed for publication in the magazine "Litera", is undoubtedly relevant, due to the consideration of the features of the work of the English writer Gilbert Keith Chesterton, whose creative activity came at the beginning of the 20th century. As the author rightly argues, the motive of surprise is one of the central motifs in the work of G. K. Chesterton. The question of the significance of this motif in the writer's artistic world in literary studies was only partially touched upon (for example, in the works of N. L. Trauberg and E. V. Vasilyeva), but was not considered in detail, which emphasizes the relevance of the presented research. The article is groundbreaking, one of the first in Russian literary criticism devoted to the study of such topics in the 21st century. Unfortunately, the author does not provide information about the corpus of the texts under study. The scope and principles of sampling the linguistic material on which the study is based are also unclear. The author does not specify the sample size and its principles. How large is the text corpus and from what sources was it obtained? Another negative factor is the lack of examples from the original source. The author probably works with a Russian-language translation, rather than the original English-language texts, which does not always allow us to fully appreciate the author's work in all the originality of linguistic features and style. The article presents a research methodology, the choice of which is quite adequate to the goals and objectives of the work. The author turns, among other things, to various methods to confirm the hypothesis put forward. The following research methods are used: biographical, hermeneutical, dialectical. This work was done professionally, in compliance with the basic canons of scientific research. The research was carried out in line with modern scientific approaches, the work consists of an introduction containing the formulation of the problem, the main part, traditionally beginning with a review of theoretical sources and scientific directions, a research and a final one, which presents the conclusions obtained by the author. The bibliography of the article contains 22 sources, including exclusively works in Russian. We believe that the author's work has not been ignored by foreign researchers, whose works it would be appropriate to add to the list of cited works, since the absence of works in foreign languages separates this work from global science. Unfortunately, the article does not contain references to fundamental works such as monographs, PhD and doctoral dissertations. A greater number of references to authoritative works, such as monographs, doctoral and/or PhD dissertations on related topics, which could strengthen the theoretical component of the work in line with the national scientific school. A technical mistake is not following the generally accepted alphabetical arrangement of the list of cited sources. In general, it should be noted that the article is written in a simple, understandable language for the reader. However, it contains a number of technical errors. There are technical typos in the text: "The writer believes that in order to return such a vision ...", a mismatch "In the writer's novels, the plot repeats itself, in which the characters, faced with something unexpected that does not fit into their usual ideas about the world, are surprised by what is happening and experiences ...". The practical significance of the research lies in the possibility of using its results in the process of teaching university courses in literary studies and textual studies. The article will undoubtedly be useful to a wide range of people, philologists, undergraduates and graduate students of specialized universities. The article "The motive of surprise in the work of G. K. Chesterton" can be recommended for publication in a scientific journal.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.