Статья 'Эпатаж в искусстве ХХ века: соблюдение и отрицание языковых средств выражения' - журнал 'Культура и искусство' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Culture and Art
Reference:

Petrov, V. O. Epatage in Art of XXth Century: Observation and Denial of Linguistic Expressive Means

Abstract: Epatage in art of XXth century was a widespread and quite contradictory phenomenon that was described by many artists, composers, poets and writers but still cannot be clearly classified due to its diversity. However, the author of the present research article tries to give a classification of epatage artwork of XXth century from the point of view of observation or denial of linguistic expressive means. The main research method used by the author of the article is the analytical analysis of regular patterns of the artwork of XXth century and synthesis of the results into a classification. Epatage in art of XXth century hasn’t been sufficiently studied modern cultural researchers. Therefore the author of this article tries to compare major pieces of the epatage art and create their classification. For the first time in cultural researches the author views works created by V. Ekiomvsky, S. Zaniy, E. Brown, R. Haubenstock-Ramati and D. Cram from this point of view.


Keywords:

art history, music, music of XXth century, epatage, classification, Ekimovsky, Zagniy, Brown, Haubenstock-Ramati, Cram.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Braun E. Otkrytaya forma // Kompozitory o sovremennoi notatsii: Khrestomatiya / sost. T.S. Kyuregyan, V.S. Tsenova. — M., 2009. S. 120-130.
2. Bulycheva E. K voprosu o smekhovoi traditsii antiutopii khudozhnikov-nonkonformistov // Iskusstvo KhKh veka: Paradoksy smekhovoi kul'tury: Sbornik statei. — Nizhnii Novgorod, 2001. S. 306-316.
3. Gorbunova Yu.V. Sverkhtsikl «Makrokosmos» Dzhordzha Krama: obraznaya dramaturgiya: Diplomnaya rabota / Astrakhanskaya gosudarstvennaya konservatoriya (akademiya) / Nauch. ruk. — V.O. Petrov. — Astrakhan': AGK, 2012.
4. Erokhin S.V. Bukvy kak osnova palitry khudozhnika // Vestnik VGU. Seriya: Filologiya. Zhurnalistika, 2008. № 2. S. 197-205.
5. Pereverzeva M.V. K probleme klassifikatsii aleatornykh form // Izrail' XXI: muzykal'nyi zhurnal. — № 28 — iyul', 2011 / Red. M. Rais // Elektronnyi resurs: http://www.21israel-music.com/Aleatorika_klassifikatsia.htm
6. Petrov V.O. Instrumental'naya kompozitsiya so slovom: voprosy teorii i istorii zhanra // Muzykovedenie. — 2011. — № 4. S. 2-8.
7. Petrov V.O. Instrumental'nyi teatr: tipologiya zhanra // Muzykal'naya akademiya. — 2010. — № 3. S. 161-166;
8. Petrov V.O. O sobytiinosti syuzhetov v proizvedeniyakh instrumental'nogo teatra // Muzykovedenie. — 2011. — № 12. S. 9-14.
9. Petrov V.O. Funktsii verbal'nogo teksta v instrumental'noi kompozitsii vtoroi poloviny KhKh veka // Kul'tura i iskusstvo: Nauchnyi retsenziruemyi zhurnal. Vyp. 4. — M.: OOO «NB-Media», 2011. S. 105-114.
10. Khaubenshtok-Ramati R. Muzyka i abstraktnaya zhivopis' // Kompozitory o sovremennoi notatsii: Khrestomatiya / sost. T.S. Kyuregyan, V.S. Tsenova. — M., 2009. S. 230-231.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.