Статья 'Гносеологическое родство и взаимопроникновение способов научного и художественного отражения действительности в процессе конвергенции этих феноменов' - журнал 'Культура и искусство' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Culture and Art
Reference:

Golubytsky, Yu. A. Gnoseological Relation and Interaction of Scientifi c and Artistic Ways of Refl ecting the Reality in the Process of Convergence of These Phenomena

Abstract: Being the follower of the literature-centered outlook on the basic, fundamental cultural phenomena, the author disseminates his approach and views on interdisciplinary interaction between culture (in particular, literature) and humanitarian disciplines. The author proposes a hypothesis about literature-determinated genesis of sociology and, going even further — the entire class of humanitarian sciences. Having performed an insight into the development of the thesis, the author tries to prove the close gnoseological relation between literature (documentary literature in the fi rst place) and social science.


Keywords:

literature, sociology, divergence, convergence, determinism, physiologism, essay, perception, cogni tion, hyper language, mega science, stylistics, written reproduction, interdisciplinary interaction, innovativeness, transformations.


This article is unavailable for unregistered users. Click to login or register

References
1. Belinskiy V. G. Poln. sobr. soch.: V 13 t. T. 10. M., 1955.
2. Brekht B. Teatr. Sobranie sochineniy: V 5 t. T. 2. M., 1965.
3. Burd'e P. Nachala. M., 1994.
4. Volodina I. P., Akimenko A. A., Potapova Z. M., Poluyakhtova I. K. Istoriya ital'yanskoy literatury XIX– XX vv. M., 1990.
5. Gofman A. B. Sem' lektsiy po istorii sotsiologii. M., 1995.
6. Gulyga A. V. Estetika istorii. M., 1974.
7. Ivanov V. P. I. T. Kokorev. Zhizn' i tvorchestvo. Minsk, 1984.
8. Kantorovich V. Sotsiologiya i literatura // Novyy mir, 1967, № 12.
9. Ketle L. A. Sotsial'naya sistema i zakony, eyu upravlyayushchie. SPb., 1866.
10. Kuleshov V. I. Natural'naya shkola v russkoy literature XIX v. M., 1982.
11. Kukushkina E. I. Russkaya sotsiologiya XIX v. – nachala XX v. M., 1993.
12. Levenstim A. A. Nishchenstvo v Rossii po otzyvam nachal'nikov guberniy. SPb., 1899.
13. Maykov V. Kriticheskie opyty. SPb., 1891.
14. Mering F. Karl Marks. Istoriya ego zhizni. M., 1957.
15. Nitsshe F. Genealogiya morali. SPb., 2008.
16. Osipov G. V. Vozrozhdenie otechestvennoy sotsiologii (kak eto bylo na samom dele) // Polveka bor'by i sversheniy. M., 2008.
17. Plekhanov G. V. Izbrannye filosofskie proizvedeniya. T.V. M., 1958.
18. Sapov V. V. V nachale «dlinnogo puti» // Sorokin P. A. Prestuplenie i kara, podvig i nagrada. M., 2006.
19. Sipovskiy V. Etapy russkoy mysli. Pg., 1924.
20. Sorokin P. A. Sistema sotsiologii. T. 2. M., 1993.
21. Spenser G. Sinteticheskaya filosofiya. Kiev, 1997.
22. Shubkin V. N. Sotsiologiya i obshchestvo: nauchnoe poznanie i etika nauki. M., 2010.
23. Epshteyn S. Uchenye prikazchiki kapitala // Novyy mir, 1965, № 6.
24. Yakimovich T. Frantsuzskiy realisticheskiy ocherk 1830–1848 gg. M., 1963
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.