Статья 'Кино как интертекст: от мифа города как праздничного разгула к апокалиптическим образам' - журнал 'Культура и искусство' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Culture and Art
Reference:

Кино как интертекст: от мифа города как праздничного разгула к апокалиптическим образам

Khrenov Nikolay Andreevich

Doctor of Philosophy

chief researcher of the Department of Media and Popular Arts at State Institute of Art Studies of the Ministry of Culture of the Russian Federation, Professor of Aesthetics of the Department of History and Theory of Culture at S. A. Gerasimov All - Russian State University of Cinematography

121108, Russia, g. Moscow, ul. Pivchenkova, 5

nihrenov@mail.ru
Other publications by this author
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0625.2016.5.17514

Received:

06-01-2016


Published:

28-10-2016


Abstract: In his article Khrenov attempts to define mythological subtexts that define how particular movies and films created in different periods are perceived by the audience. According to the author, these subtexts have a strong influence on mass consciousness of public, however, public is usually unaware of them. Among other things the content of mass reception includes out-of-cinematographic manifestations of collective unconscious. Mental projections of archetypic images which came into existence in different periods of cultural history and connected with utopian visions, myths, and religious symbols are coming to the fore. Noteworthy that projections on the city are precede the projections of collective unconscious on the cinema; they are transferred into the cinema later on. Finally, the cinema in principal makes a colossal intertext in which cultural history is reflected both in its axial and pre-axial aspects. The scope of analysis comes down to the projections which become realistic already at early stages of cinematography history. To define mythological, folklore and archetypical subtexts of cinematography reception, the author of the article has used methodology of such academic disciplines as receptive esthetics, cultural semiotics, sociology of art, crowd psychology, psychoanalysis and analytical psychology. The main conclusions of the research are the following: a) the structure of the audience of early cinematograph was made up mostly of urban social groups which had folklore stereotypes in their consciousness; b) the city was perceived in accordance with the folklore stereotype of the festive revelry; c) the folklore aura around the city projected by the yesterday's peasant- migrant defines many things including how cinematography is perceived by mass audience. The author's contribution to the topic of cinematography reception is the cinematography perception in terms of the myth of the city that existed in the nonindustrial culture. The  novelty of the research is caused by the fact that the author of the article describes specific archetypes including religious archetypes that exist in the mind of the audience (recipients) and became evident in the process of cinematography perception in the 1900 - 1910s. 


Keywords:

rite, liminality, utopia, holiday, archetype, reception, folklore, myth, city, cinematography

References
1. Arendt Kh. Istoki totalitarizma. M., 1996., s. 441.
2. Belyi A. Gorod // Belyi A. Arabeski., M., 1911.
3. Blok A. Sobranie sochinenii v 8 t., t. 2., M-L., 1960.
4. Bryusov V. Sobranie sochinenii v 7 t., t. 1., M., 1973.
5. Bulgakov S. Geroizm i podvizhnichestvo // Vekhi. Sbornik statei o russkoi intelligentsii., M., 1990.
6. Bulgakov S. Apokaliptika, sotsiologiya, filosofiya istoriya, sotsializm // Russkaya mysl'., 1910., №6.
7. Kaiyua R. Mif i chelovek. Chelovek i sakral'noe. , M., 2003.
8. Krakauer Z. Psikhologicheskaya istoriya nemetskogo kino. Ot Kaligari do Gitlera. M., 1977.
9. Massovaya literatura i krizis burzhuaznoi kul'tury Zapada., M., 1974.
10. Nitsshe F. K genealogii morali // Nitsshe F. Sochineniya v 2-kh t., t. 2., M., 1990.
11. Raikh V. Psikhologiya mass i fashizm., SPb., 1997.
12. Sennet R. Padenie publichnogo cheloveka., M., 2002.
13. Toporkov A. Kinematograf i mif // Kinematograf. Sbornik statei., M., 1919.
14. Khrenov N. Razvlechenie v epokhu smeny kul'turnykh tsiklov: model' fol'klora // Razvlechenie i iskusstvo., SPb., 2008.
15. Khrenov N. Izbrannye raboty po kul'turologii. Kul'tura i imperiya., M., 2014.
16. Khrenov N. Publika v istorii kul'tury. Fenomen publiki v rakurse psikhologii mass., M., 2007.
17. Khrenov N. Mif v formakh kinematografa kak slagaemoe imperskoi identichnosti // Teoriya khudozhestvennoi kul'tury. Vypusk 15., M., 2014.
18. Khrenov N. Arkhetipy pravoslavnogo messianizma v russkom kino // Kinovedcheskie zapiski. Vypusk 82., M., 2007.
19. Chilingarov A. Vliyanie Dyurera i sovremennoi emu nemetskoi grafiki na ikonografiyu postvizantiiskogo iskusstva // Drevnerusskoe iskusstvo. Zarubezhnye svyazi. M., 1975.
20. Chukovskii K. Sobranie sochinenii v 6 t., t. 6., M., 1969.
21. Tsiv'yan Yu. Istoricheskaya retseptsiya kino. Kinematograf v Rossii. 1896-1930., Riga.
22. Shestov L. Pobedy i porazheniya (Zhizn' i tvorchestvo G. Ibsena) // Russkaya mysl'. 1910., № 4.
23. Eizenshtein S. Izbrannye proizvedeniya v 6 t., t. 3., M., 1964.
24. Etkind A. Khlyst. Sekty, literatura i revolyutsiya., M., 1998.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.