Ñòàòüÿ 'Ê âîïðîñó îá óñèëåíèè õòîíè÷åñêîãî íà÷àëà â âîçðîæäåííîì êóëüòå Àôðîäèòû â Ñåâåðíîì Ïðè÷åðíîìîðüå â ïåðâûå âåêà íàøåé ýðû ' - æóðíàë '×åëîâåê è êóëüòóðà' - NotaBene.ru
ïî
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Man and Culture
Reference:

On the Strengthening of the Chthonic Principle in the Revived Aphrodite Cult in the Northern Black Sea Region in the First Centuries a.d.

Yartsev Sergey Vladimirovich

Doctor of History

Associate Professor, Department of History and Archeology, Tula State Pedagogical University named after L.N.Tolstoy

300026, Russia, Tula region, Tula, Prospekt Lenina str., 125

s-yartsev.@yandex.ru
Other publications by this author
 

 
Shushunova Elena Valeryevna

Assistant Lecturer of the Chair of History and Archeology, Tula State Lev Tostoy Pedagogical University

125 Lenin Avenue, Tula, Tula region, 300026, Russia

schuschunova.elena@yandex.ru

DOI:

10.25136/2409-8744.2022.5.39053

EDN:

IZJULN

Received:

23-10-2022


Published:

30-10-2022


Abstract: The research object is the domain of Hellenic religious worldview in the Northern Black Sea region during the Antiquity era. The research focuses on the revival of the Aphrodite cult in the Bosporus and Chersonese in the first centuries A.D. and the strengthening of the chthonic element in these beliefs. The authors consider in detail such aspects of the topic as the mythological origin, the presence of various epicleses of the Greco-barbarian Aphrodite, her connection with other female deities, as well as the features of the chthonic functions originally inherent in this goddess of love and family life. The article pays particular attention to Aphrodite's involvement in funerary rites and the deity's patronage of dead souls. The main research conclusions stem from the identified multifactorial reasons for the popularity of the Aphrodite cult in the Northern Black Sea region in the Roman period. The most important of these are the distribution of the deity's cult among the Romans and the possibility of Aphrodite's divine protection covering a wide enough range of the local population, including sailors, as well as the peculiarities of the reaction of local Hellenes to the Roman cultural expansion. The authors' special contribution to the study of the subject is to link the radical changes in the veneration of Aphrodite in the Northern Black Sea region with the democratization of the apotheosis of the dead in the first centuries A.D. The novelty of the research lies in conducting the first comprehensive study in historiography on this topic, which has revealed one of the main reasons for the return of popularity, as well as the archaization of the Aphrodite cult in the Northern Black Sea region during the Roman period. According to the authors, it was an increased need for the deification of deceased relatives, in order to ensure the peace of their souls and achieve immortality. It was Aphrodite, the oldest and supreme Hellenic deity as Mistress of the afterworld, who could most effectively breathe divine powers into the deceased as well as ensure that he/she would be born in a new capacity.


Keywords:

Northern Black Sea region, Bosporan Kingdom, Chersonese, Aphrodite, Eros, Great Goddess, divine protection, ancestor cult, heroization of the dead, chthonic cults

This article is automatically translated. You can find original text of the article here.

Quite a large amount of scientific literature is devoted to the cult of Aphrodite in the Northern Black Sea region [47, pp. 137-141; 20, pp. 104-109; 38, pp. 101-118; 39, pp. 88-92; 25, pp. 121-126; 42, pp. 111-117; 43, pp. 138-145; 9, pp. 92-95; 52, pp. 204-272; 1, p. 219-223; 29, pp. 93-106; 30, pp. 56-71; 6, pp. 127-131; 7, pp. 106-111; 35, pp. 59-71; 33, pp. 293-315; 34, pp. 353-357; 37, pp. 59-71; 44, pp. 308-337; 5, pp. 9-16; 59, pp. 353-361; 55, p. 15-32; 50; 51; 60]. Nevertheless, many issues related to the veneration of this deity still remain unresolved. One of the most difficult such problems is the mysterious revival of this cult in the Northern Black Sea region during the Roman period, and the emergence of a tendency to archaize religious ideas associated with it.

As it is known, Aphrodite was the daughter of Uranus (Hesiod. Theog., 176-206) or Zeus and Dione (Hom. Hymn., II, V, 370). This allowed the goddess to belong to the circle of the most influential Olympian deities. Moreover, considering that according to the first of the variants, Aphrodite was miraculously born from the blood of the castrated Uranus, she was even older than these deities, including Zeus [33, p. 295]. Aphrodite, the foam-born, Kyphroborn, Cytherea (Hom. Hymn., IV, 1-16, 175, 181, 287; VI, 15-18), in the minds of the Hellenes, was represented as the goddess of love and beauty. However, not only people and animals were subject to her, but also gods (with the exception of some female deities) (Hom. Hymn., IV, 1-44). At the same time, Herodotus hinted at the eastern origin of the goddess, mentioning that the Scythians call her "Argimpasa", "the Assyrians call Aphrodite Militta, the Arabs – Alilat, and the Persians – Mitra" (Herod., I, 131; IV, 59). If we add to this the rather curious images of Aphrodite in a tower crown of the type of eastern Cybele, then we can agree with the conclusion of A.S.Rusyaeva that we really have one of the oldest and most difficult deities to interpret, with many different-time and multi-ethnic layers [56, p. 15-32; 8, p. 17-18; 33, p. 295-296]. A similar opinion was reached by S.Y. Saprykin, who concluded about the influence of Anatolian cults on the Bosporus, including religious beliefs related to the veneration of Aphrodite [36, p. 354]. The complexity and ambiguity of this complex of beliefs is confirmed by Pausanias, naming several, in his opinion, the main qualities that the goddess was endowed with in different parts of Hellas: "The Cnidians venerate Aphrodite most of all and they have a number of temples of the goddess. Of these, the oldest is Aphrodite Doritida (Giving fertility), then – Acreia (the Lady of the mountain peaks) and the newest, which everyone simply calls Cnidian, and the Cnidians themselves – Euploia" (Paus., I, 1,3). The last epiclesis of the goddess "happily floating" was also recorded for the Northwestern Black Sea region (Borysthenes and Olbia) (IOSPE, I2, 168) [33, pp. 298, 309]. It is possible that such a connection of the cult of Aphrodite with navigation really goes back to the specifics of the religious ideas of Miletus during the colonization era. The more interesting is the picture of the complete absence of the veneration of Aphrodite in this hypostasis in the Dorian polis, and primarily in Chersonesos [33, p. 308]. It is believed that here, basically, this cult was of a domestic nature, and Aphrodite herself was represented, as a rule, in the nude, as the goddess of love [35, pp. 59-71; 34, pp. 354-355]. However, it is also obvious that the cult of Aphrodite in the Dorian polis still had its own characteristic specifics associated with the manifestation of increased attention to the chthonic functions of the goddess. In this regard, the influence of the famous Pan-Hellenic sanctuary of Apollo in Delphi, in which Aphrodite was given the role of a Tombstone, and a ritual with libations and mystical prayers with appeals to the deceased was performed in front of her statue (Plut. Mor. Quest. Rom., 23) [34, pp. 353-354].

Of interest is the fact that on Bosporus Aphrodite, despite her original, purely Hellenistic (in the Ionian version) nature of the cult [8, p. 12], later became revered mainly in the hypostasis of Urania (Heavenly), that is, with a fundamental indication of her unique divine power received from Uranus. It is unlikely that the Ionians played a major role in such a religious transformation [47, pp. 137-141; 1, pp. 219-224]. Most researchers believe that these beliefs developed here on the basis of the merger of the Hellenic cult with the veneration of some other local deity, for example, the Sindo-Meotian goddess [25, p. 123; 38, p. 101-118] or the Scythian Argimpasa [10, p. 212-213; 15, p. 48-49; 33, p. 300]. In the latter case, the influence of the Iranian Ardvisura Anahita on the Scythian deity is also possible [52, pp. 238-253]. However, the degree of these barbaric influences on the cult of Aphrodite is not easy to determine, because the level of Hellenization of the Scythians and especially the Sindo-Meots was sufficiently high [8, p. 14]. The interpretation of the contradictory epiclesis of the heavenly goddess also causes difficulty.  On the one hand, the hypostases of Aphrodite Urania and Euploia are quite close, since, to one degree or another, they are associated with the patronage of navigation and sailors [33, p. 298]. The epithet of the Bosporan Aphrodite – Navarchis (Shipwright), recorded during the reign of King Asander (47-17 BC), best demonstrates to us this connection with the sea (KBN, 30). However, on the other hand, the goddess of fertility Aphrodite Urania, at its core, was certainly a Chthonic deity, and, therefore, was directly connected with the funeral rite and with the Greek Eleusinian deities [33, p. 299].  Moreover, it is possible that it was the Chthonic ideas that turned out to be the link that brought the beliefs of the Greeks and barbarians closer together, ensuring the syncretic Greek-barbaric nature of the cult of Aphrodite [6, p. 128].

In the Bosporus during the classical and Hellenistic periods, Aphrodite was revered in many cities of the state. The Bosporan Spartokids especially singled out Aphrodite among their pantheon, a sanctuary was built in her honor, which was located on the acropolis [41, pp. 83, 88]. Epigraphic inscriptions record on the Bosporus the cult of Aphrodite under kings Perisade I, Perisade IV, Asandra (KBN, 30, 75, 971, 972) [39, p. 91; 11, p. 81]. One of the main sanctuaries of Aphrodite Apatura on the Asian Bosporus was so famous that information about it was preserved by several ancient authors at once (Strabo, XI, 2,10; Plin. NH., VI, 18; Ptol., V, 8,2; Steph. Byz. s.v. A). In this regard, it is possible that, as we have already said above, the cult of the said "lady of Apatura" went back to the non-Greek Chthonic deity, which may explain the popularity of her main sanctuary on the Taman Peninsula [16, p. 33; 51, p. 40]. In any case, the similarity of the myth of Aphrodite Apatura (Strabo., XI, 2, 10) with the ethnogonic legend of the Scythians (Herod., IV, 8 -10; Diod., II, 43) is clearly not accidental [50, pp. 111-117]. Considering that the legends about the Amazons are usually associated with those areas where the cult of the Great Goddess prevailed [57, p. 462-481], the ancient barbarian deity could well appear here in the images of Greek goddesses [50, p. 113-123; 58, p. 147]. In this regard, the image of Aphrodite in the form of an Amazon really allows us to interpret the latter as servants of the Great Goddess [51, p. 55].  Thus, like all other fertility goddesses, Aphrodite was originally characterized by chthonic ideas.  Most likely, they were connected both with the development by the Greeks of lands far from the metropolis with incessant tectonic activity, and with agriculture itself – the basis of the economy of the Bosporan Kingdom [6, pp. 128-129].  The latter circumstance is clearly indicated by the images of the goddess in the form of a head, bust or herma [50, pp. 326-336]. This image, for example, on protomes or on a number of so-called "Bosporan pelicans", really represents Aphrodite in the form of "growing" out of the ground, which, of course, testifies to the original chthonic principles of the cult of the goddess, her regenerating function [6, 130; 50, p. 326].

Nevertheless, by the turn of the era, on the same Bosporus, as in general and throughout the northern periphery of the ancient world, the holidays in honor of Aphrodite are becoming less significant. Even the sanctuary in Apatura soon turns out to be almost abandoned (Plin. NH., IV, 18) [37, p. 65]. Maybe indeed, as M.V.Skrzhinskaya writes, this state of affairs was influenced by the activities of Mithridates VI Evpator, who introduced a new calendar of religious holidays on the Bosporus [37, p. 65]. However, even in this case, the revival of the cult of Aphrodite in the Roman period does not seem to be an entirely understandable phenomenon. On the Bosporus, the goddess again begins to figure as Apatura or Urania [43, p. 143; 44, p. 308-337]. In Chersonesos in the second half of the II – III century AD, a new large temple was erected in honor of the goddess in general, which clearly indicates the state character of her cult (IOSPE, I2 440, 441, 442, 443, 446). It is no coincidence that this temple of Aphrodite was specially built in the Roman style [31, pp. 227, 249]. At the same time, judging by the large number of finds of figurines and jewelry depicting the goddess and her companions in the burials of the specified time, this cult is beginning to acquire a more pronounced chthonic character than it was before [27, p. 9, 11; 21, p. 151; 35, p. 68; 34, p. 353-354; 26, pp. 67-213; 18, pp. 280-283; 2, pp. 199-201].  

Of course, here it is necessary to take into account that the universalism of Aphrodite with her numerous hypostases allowed her to penetrate into many spheres of activity of ancient society [6, p. 130]. Therefore, we cannot categorically assert that the chthonic functions of Aphrodite, which were originally characteristic of her cult, with the beginning of the Roman period, began to turn into the most important part of religious representations associated with her image. As noted by A.S.Rusyaeva and V.M.Zubar, otherwise, in the same Chersonese there would be more objects with the image of Aphrodite in the burials of the specified time [34, pp. 354-355]. Nevertheless, it is impossible to ignore the fact of the increasing popularity among the Romans of the cult of Aphrodite, which is increasingly being portrayed in the company of Eros. In his research, S.Y.Saprykin convincingly showed that in this case Aphrodite should be perceived as a goddess who inspired faith in the rebirth of life after death, and hence in immortality.  If love is the source of new life, then babies as sons of Aphrodite are indeed her symbol of this rebirth. At the same time, the Eros on the funerary monuments are clearly depicted in the image of the god of death Thanatos, and the sleeping baby in the image of Hypnos, the god of sleep. This peculiarity is explained by the fact that two interrelated ideas were hidden in the sleeping infant, because death is simultaneously a return to a new life [35, p. 66]. All this well explains why all the symbols of the chthonic Aphrodite, which became popular in Roman times – a shell, a mirror, Eros on dolphins, were represented on the Chersonese statuette of the II century AD, studied in detail by S.Y. Saprykin [35, pp. 66-67].  Apparently at this stage, the cult of Aphrodite, in which death was perceived as marriage, and the goddess was its organizer, began to approach other beliefs of chthonic female deities [51, p. 90]. In this regard, given the radical changes in the veneration of Aphrodite in the Northern Black Sea region in the first centuries of our era, it is difficult to agree with the position of A.S.Rusyaeva and V.M.Zubar, who suggested that at this time the statuettes of Aphrodite and Eros personified, for the most part, happy love and family life [34, pp. 356-357]. Here we fully agree with the opinion of S.Yu.Saprykina noted that, despite Aphrodite's preservation in Roman times of her main fruiting function and the divine power that protects love and beauty, it is impossible to ignore the numerous facts of this period that testify to the veneration of the goddess as a sea deity and patroness of deceased souls [35, p. 68]. Moreover, this is completely consistent with votive objects depicting the goddess and her companions, not only in the tombs on the necropolis of Chersonesos [21, p. 151; 22, p. 97-98], but also on the barbaric burial grounds of the nearest neighborhood (for example, the finds of a bronze mirror of the II–III century AD with the image of Aphrodite and Eros from burials of the burial ground "Sevastopol" [40, pp. 172-173, Fig. 31, 6], or figures of Eros from the necropolis of the Roman time "Belbek IV" [12, p. 67, p. 152, Table 150, 2; 13, p. 238, Table 236, 3; 12, p. 160, tables 158, 11; 13, p. 238, table 236, 1]).     

In this regard, the reasons for such a surge of archaic features of the ancient Hellenic cult in the era of the Roman Empire are not entirely clear. Of course, we can accept the version of A.S.Rusyaeva and V.M.Zubar, who, using the example of Chersonesos, drew attention to the original specifics of the cult of Aphrodite in Dorian cities, which, in their opinion, was reflected in the religious worldview of the Chersonesites [34, p. 353]. In other words, the specified feature of the development of religious ideas associated with Aphrodite could simply get its further natural development. There is also an opinion that the revival of the popularity of the worship of the goddess was based on the assertion of Aphrodite as the giver of military success [8, p. 16]. The revival of the cult of Aphrodite and L.P. Harko is associated with the military activity of the Bosporan kings in the Roman period, who switched to barbarians attacking from the east. According to the scientist, at this time the Asian Bosporus in military-political terms began to come to the forefront of the defense of the state, which caused the revival of the old cultural traditions of the Asian side, including the Phanagor cult of Aphrodite Apatura [48, pp. 200-201].  

However, we note that in the veneration of Aphrodite in the Roman period, new features of her cult appear virtually everywhere. Also, the general trend of religious life is the transformation of ideas associated with numerous female deities, towards a single syncretic image of the Great Goddess, whose main essence begins to shift towards protective and patronizing functions. According to E.M.Alekseeva, it was the kings who gave a new life to the ancient cult of Aphrodite Apatura in the first centuries AD on the Bosporus under the influence of the development of navigation in the state. This is indeed confirmed by the official nature of this cult in the first centuries of our era and its connection with the epicleses of Urania and Navarchida (the Founder). Since they are interconnected, according to the scientist, it was navigation that caused the revival of these traditional beliefs [2, p. 199]. In Gorgippia in 110, under Sauromat I, a new temple of Aphrodite Navarchida was even erected (KBN, 1115). Under the same tsar, "the porticos surrounding the temple ... were restored to Aphrodite Apaturiade" (KBN, 1045). The "Synod of the goddess Aphrodite" headed by the "governor of the royal court" is mentioned in another inscription dating from the II century AD (KBN, 1055). It is believed that the king Remetalk also donated lands with pelats attached to them, namely to the temple of Aphrodite (KBN, 976). All these facts, of course, speak of a serious revival of the traditional cult of Aphrodite in the ancient centers of the Northern Black Sea region. However, in our opinion, this trend turned out to be associated not only with the development of navigation, but also with a number of other circumstances. In any case, the placement of the main symbols of Chthonic Aphrodite in the Bosporus burials at this time can hardly be called accidental: terracotta figurines of dolphin and Eros [19, p. 146; 17, p. 763], gold pendants or clasps for clothes with the image of Eros [18, p. 280-283; 28, p. 44, fig. 22; 45, p. 94], plaques in the form of figures of Eros [28, p. 43, fig. 20-21], and even children's rattles with the image of Eros on the lid [46, p. 49-50].

The situation with the changed status of the goddess in the religious life of the Bosporans in the Roman period seems to be clarified by a tombstone found in 1889 in Kerch and now stored in the State Hermitage Museum. According to L.P. Harko, it should be dated to the border of the I/II – II centuries AD. It shows the image of a heroized deceased military commander (a wreath is put on his head by a flying Nickname), in company with a female figure. The most plausible version is that the deceased stands in front of a priestess with the attributes of a goddess, in whose temple she performs priestly duties. The deity himself is located in the upper tier on the pediment with a tower crown on his head and is argumentatively identified with Aphrodite [48, pp. 203-204]. Doubts on this score, as well as the assumption that we are facing Demeter and not Aphrodite [32, pp. 149-150; 14, pp. 63-64], in our opinion, are groundless. In the Bosporan image, Eros is clearly visible behind the priestess in the guise of a goddess, which allows us to correlate this plot of the heroization of the deceased with Aphrodite's demonstration of her divine powers with a greater degree of probability [48, pp. 203-204]. Moreover, it was in this form, and in this high headdress, that Aphrodite Apatura was depicted on Bosporan coins of the turn of AD – III century AD [49, p. 125]. In this regard, given the uniqueness of this tombstone, which preserved the image of the Bosporus five-column temple dedicated to the local goddess [48, p. 203; 14, p. 63], it can be concluded that the role of this deity in the religious life of people in the first centuries AD, and, first of all, in the field of funeral rites. This corresponds well to the emergence of the popularity of the image on Bosporan coins of the first century A.D., apparently, the same temple with an odd number of columns, typical of the cult architecture of the Northern Black Sea region [3, pp. 82-84; 48, pp. 197-203; 24, p. 22, Fig. 3]. According to P.O. Karyshkovsky, it was the temple of Aphrodite Apatura in Phanagoria, especially revered on the Bosporus [23, p. 188]. V.D. Blavatsky also agreed with the fact that this is a local Bosporan temple [4, pp. 162-163]. In a recent thorough study by M.M.Choref on this topic, the scientist once again convincingly proved that it was the Bosporan temple of Aphrodite Apatura that was depicted on the coins and the indicated tombstone, which was really not in the Panticapaeum [49, pp. 124-125].

Of course, observing such a rise in the popularity of this goddess, it is necessary to take into account the desire of part of the local population to please the Romans, whose veneration of Aphrodite under the name of Venus was really widespread [33, pp. 311-312]. In other words, it is quite possible that this cult has re-penetrated into the Northern Black Sea region already from Rome. Aphrodite was represented in it as the ancestor and patroness of the Roman people [27, p. 9]. The Romans, as is known, really revered Aphrodite in the hypostasis of their main ancestor (through the son of the Trojan hero Aeneas, who became the legendary ancestor of the Julii) (Lucr.I, 1; Verg.Aen.) [33, p. 312]. Whether this was really the case, it is difficult to say now. We have already said that the religious transformation in the northern periphery of the ancient world in Roman times may have been associated with the dominance of religious cults spread throughout the empire here. At the same time, most of them were heavily modified, which forced many Hellenes – supporters of traditional religion to revive their ancient beliefs, as a rule, in an archaic form [53, pp. 382-384]. Nevertheless, it is obvious that everything cannot be reduced to the result of Roman cultural expansion. In our opinion, it is also necessary to take into account the complex processes that took place in the religious consciousness of the people who lived at that time. Many of them at this period lost faith in the old gods, turned their gaze to the east, where Persian, Syrian or Egyptian religious legends about dying and resurrecting deities offered, it would seem, a simpler and more reliable path to immortality and a new life. According to S.Y. Saprykin, it was the influence of Anatolian cults (the Great Mother of the Gods – Cybele, the Phrygian goddess Angissa, the Pontic Ma-Enio, the Iranian-Pontic-Cappadocian Anahit, the Persian Artemis) on the complex of beliefs associated with the veneration of Aphrodite Urania Apatura that caused an increase in chthonic traits in him [36, p. 354].

 At the same time, during such a deepening crisis of ancient ideology, those of the people who tried to stay within their traditional religious consciousness often began to attribute new functions to the old gods, which, in their opinion, better expressed the divine essence of a particular savior.  The fact is that the latter was now guaranteed not only to protect a person from dangers in this life (both on land and at sea), but also to give his adept immortality. These changes in the ideology of the ancient population well explain the widespread democratization at this time of the apotheosis of the dead, when almost every person after death in the minds of his living relatives turned into a deified hero. In this regard, in the search for effective intermediaries between the world of the living and the mythological universe of the gods, people increasingly stopped at such deceased relatives – heroes staying with the deities in the other world. The Roman cultural expansion in the Northern Black Sea region, apparently, only contributed to the deepening of this crisis, which clearly strengthened the Chthonic principles in traditional Hellenic cults. It is obvious that the mass glorification of their deceased relatives began to turn into a universal necessity, not only for the implementation of intermediary functions with the Chthonic world, but also for solving the most important sacred and protective tasks that in the first centuries of our era began to come to the fore in people's lives.

Thus, the pronounced tendency to the archaization of religious ideas in the first centuries of our era and serious ideological adjustments in the cult of Aphrodite, allow us to consider this goddess at this time, primarily as a catachtonic patroness of the deceased in the hypostasis of the Grave, Dark or Tombstone. Of course, this strengthening of the chthonic principle in the cult of Aphrodite in the ancient states of the Northern Black Sea region at this time, of course, was partly facilitated by the spread of religious ideas associated with this goddess among the Romans. This circumstance, apparently, played an important role in the revival of this cult in the far northern periphery of the ancient world. In addition, Aphrodite's well-known ability to cover a fairly wide range of the local population with divine protection, including sailors, also favored the development of the popularity of the beliefs associated with her. All this, including the serious influence of Eastern cults, explains the increasing role of Aphrodite in ritual actions directly related to the apotheosis of the dead. In addition, the archaization of beliefs associated with the veneration of Aphrodite, to some extent, could be the result of the reaction of local adherents of traditional religion to the Roman cultural expansion. The Hellenes clearly sought to counter this ideological pressure with their most ancient beliefs. Nevertheless, in our opinion, the main reason for the emergence of the trend towards the archaization of the cult of Aphrodite in the Northern Black Sea region, nevertheless, were the features of the unfolding crisis of ancient ideology in the first centuries of our era. The fact is that it is within the framework of these religious transformations that the search for new deities and effective intermediaries between the real and otherworldly worlds has intensified. But most importantly, people now tried to endow the old gods with the most relevant functions for their time. Apparently, this happened in the case of Aphrodite. Considering that the place of the most effective intermediaries, in Roman times, was firmly occupied by deified deceased ancestors, Aphrodite, as the Mistress of the other world, actually began to turn into one of the main characters of the Hellenic religion. It is obvious that now, with the help of performing certain ritual actions, the goddess, with a greater degree of efficiency, could deify the deceased, allow him to merge with himself, breathe divine powers into him, and also ensure his birth in a new capacity. At the same time, apparently, one of its main functions was to move the deified hero to the region of the celestial sphere to his ancestors, as usually happens in such cases [54, p. 586]. In turn, this strengthened the protective qualities of the deity himself, who in fact transformed into a savior, ensuring the safety of people during periods of bloody wars and natural disasters, as well as granting them immortality and happiness.

References
1. Alekseeva E.M. The ancient city of Gorgippia. M.: Editorial URSS, 1997. 558 p.
2. Alekseeva E.M. Necropolis of the ancient city of Gorgippia: complex of tombs at the turn of the 2nd–3rd centuries. n. e. M.; Vologda: Antiquities of the North, 2021. 351 p.
3. Blavatsky V.D. The Art of the Northern Black Sea Coast of Antiquity. M.: Publishing House of the State. Museum of Fig. arts them. A. S. Pushkin, 1947. 119 p.
4. Blavatsky V.D. Panticapaeum. Essays on the history of the capital of the Bosporus. M.: Nauka, 1964. 231 p.
5. Bulycheva E.V. Organization and financing of the holidays of Aphrodite in Athens and the Northern Black Sea region in the 5th-4th centuries. BC. // Vestnik RGGU. Series “Literary criticism. Linguistics. Culturology. 2016. No. 11. pp. 9–16.
6. Bunin D.S. On the issue of chthonic elements in the cult of Aphrodite in the Bosporus // Bosporus Phenomenon. Colonization of the region. Formation of policies. Formation of the state / Ed. V.Yu. Zuev. SPb.: Publishing House of the State. Hermitage, 2001, pp. 127–131.
7. Bunin D.S. On the issue of the circumstances of the formation of the cult of Aphrodite Urania in the Bosporus // Bosporus Phenomenon. Problems of dating and chronology of monuments / Ed. V.Yu. Zuev. SPb.: Publishing House of the State. Hermitage, 2004, pp. 106–111.
8. Bunin D.S. The cult of Aphrodite in the Bosporus (VI century BC-III century AD). Abstract dis. … cand. ist. Sciences. M., 2005. 24 p.
9. Vakhtina M.Yu. Gold pendant with the image of Aphrodite from the excavations of the Elizavetovsky settlement on the Don // Brief reports of the Institute of Archeology. 1988. No. 194. S. 92–95.
10. Gaidukevich V.F. Bosporus kingdom. L.; Moscow: Acad. Sciences of the USSR, 1949. 624 p.
11. Grach N.L. Discovery of a new archaeological source in Nymphaeum // VDI. 1984. No. 1. pp. 81–88.
12. Gushchina I.N., Zhuravlev D.V. Necropolis of the Roman time Belbek IV in the South-Western Crimea. At 2 pm M.: Historical Museum, 2016. Part 1. 272 p.
13. Gushchina I.N., Zhuravlev D.V. Necropolis of the Roman time Belbek IV in the South-Western Crimea. At 2 pm M.: Historical Museum, 2016. Part 2. 320 p.
14. Diatroptov P.D. Kul of heroes in the ancient Northern Black Sea region. M.: Indrik, 2001. 160 p.
15. Elnitsky L.A. From the history of ancient Scythian cults // SA. 1960. No. 4. pp. 46–55.
16. Elnitsky L.A. Knowledge of the ancients about the northern countries. Moscow: Geografgiz, 1961. 224 p.
17. Zastrozhnova E.G. Mound I from the excavations of V.D. Blavatsky on the territory of Phanagoria in 1939 (unpublished materials) // Bosporus Phenomenon. Greeks and Barbarians at the Eurasian Crossroads / Ed. M.Yu. Vakhtina. St. Petersburg: Nestor-Istoriya, 2013, pp. 762–767.
18. Zubarev V.G. Paired pendants with the image of Eros from burial No. 12 of the necropolis of the settlement "Belinsky" // Bosporus Phenomenon: Art on the periphery of the ancient world / Ed. M.Yu. Vakhtina. St. Petersburg: Nestor-Istoriya, 2009, pp. 280–283.
19. Zubarev V.G., Lantsov S.B., Minaev O.V. Crypts of the necropolis of the settlement "Belinsky" // Bosporus phenomenon. Sacred meaning of the region, monuments, finds / Ed. M.Yu. Vakhtina. SPb.: Publishing House of the State. Hermitage, 2007, vol. 1, pp. 144–150.
20. Ivanova I.P. On the question of the cult of Aphrodite in the Bosporus: The image of Aphrodite in Bosporan art // VDI. 1950. No. 3. pp. 104–109.
21. Kadeev V.I. Chersonese Tauride. Life and culture (I-III centuries AD). Kharkov: Business Inform, 1996. 207 p.
22. Kadeev V.I., Sorochan S.B. Chersonese and Zahidny Pontus: the problem of contacts // Archeology. 1989. No. 4. pp. 91–102.
23. Karyshkovsky P.O.Bosporus and Rome in the 1st c. AD according to numismatic data // VDI. 1953. No. 3. pp. 179–190.
24. Kryzhitsky S.D. Architecture of the ancient states of the Northern Black Sea region. Kyiv: Naukova Dumka, 1993. 243 p.
25. Marchenko I.D. About the cult of Aphrodite on Taman // History and culture of the ancient world / Ed. MM. Kobylina. Moscow: Nauka, 1977, pp. 121–126.
26. Maslennikov A.A. Rural sanctuaries of the European Bosporus. M.; Tula, Grif and K, 2007. 564 p.
27. Meshcheryakov V.F. Religion and cults of Tauric Chersonesos in the 1st–4th centuries AD Abstract dis. … cand. history Sciences. M., 1980. 16 p.
28. World heritage of the European Bosporus. Collection of the East Crimean Historical and Cultural Museum-Reserve. Catalog / Ed. T.V.Umrikhina, K.E.Ignatova. Kerch; Simferopol: East Crimean Historical and Cultural Museum-Reserve, IP Ignatov, 2016. 356 p.
29. Moleva N.V. On the cult of Aphrodite in the Kiteysky sanctuary // Bosporus and the ancient world / Ed. K.S. Sizov. Nizhny Novgorod: Nizhny Novgorod Humanitarian Center, 1997, pp. 93–106.
30. Moleva N.V. The Water Element and Navigation in the Cult of Aphrodite in Ancient Greece and the Bosporus // Bosporan Studies. 2018. Issue. XXXVII. pp. 56–71.
31. Pichikyan I.R. Asia Minor-Northern Black Sea region: ancient traditions and influence. M.: Nauka, 1984. 296 p.
32. Rostovtsev M.I. Painting of the Kerch tomb, discovered in 1891 // Collection of archaeological articles presented to Count A.A. Bobrinsky on the day of the 25th anniversary of his chairmanship in the Archaeological Commission. SPb.: Type. V.F. Kirshbaum, 1911, pp. 119–154.
33. Rusyaeva A.S. Religion of the Pontic Hellenes in Antiquity: Myths. Sanctuaries. Cults of Olympian Gods and Heroes. Kyiv: Stilos, 2005. 559 p.
34. Rusyaeva A.S., Zubar V.M. Religious outlook // Tauric Chersonesos in the middle of the 1st century. BC.-VI century. AD. Essays on history and culture / Ed. P.P. Tolochko. Kharkov: Maidan, 2004, pp. 333–430.
35. Saprykin S.Yu. Aphrodite with two erotes from Tauric Chersonesus // Chersonesus collection. 1998. Issue. IX. pp. 59–71.
36. Saprykin S.Yu. Religion and cults of Pontus in the Hellenistic and Roman times. M.; Tula: Grif and K, 2009. 426 p.
37. Skrzhinskaya M.V. Ancient Greek holidays in Hellas and the Northern Black Sea region. Kyiv: Publishing House of the Institute of History of Ukraine of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 2009. 365 p.
38. Sokolsky N.I. Sanctuary of Aphrodite in Kepa // SA. 1964. No. 4. pp. 101–118.
39. Sokolsky N.I. The cult of Aphrodite in Kepi at the end of the 6th-5th centuries. BC. // VDI. 1973. No. 4. pp. 88–92.
40. Strzheletsky S.F., Vysotskaya T.N., Ryzhova L.A., Zhestkova G.I. The population of the Chersonesus region in the first half of the 1st millennium AD (based on the materials of the necropolis "Sovkhoz No. 10") // Stratum plus. 2003-2004(2005).No. 4. pp. 27–277.
41. Tolstikov V.P. Panticapaeum-the capital of the Bosporus // Essays on the archeology and history of the Bosporus / Ed. G.A. Koshelenko. Moscow: Nauka, 1992, pp. 45–99.
42. Tokhtasiev S.R. Bosporan legend about Aphrodite Apaturos // VDI. 1983. No. 2. pp. 111–117.
43. Tokhtasiev S.R. Apatur: The History of the Bosporus Sanctuary of Aphrodite Urania // VDI. 1986. No. 2. pp. 138–145.
44. Treister M.Yu. Syncretic female deities on jewelry from Phanagoria and Gorgippia in the first centuries AD. and some observations on the iconography of Aphrodite Urania in the Bosporus // Problems of history, philology, culture. 2015. Issue. 1(47). pp. 308–337.
45. Phanagoria. Album / Ed. V.D. Kuznetsov and A.A. Zavoykin. Moscow: Institute of Archeology RAS, 2015. 176 p.
46. ​​Khanutina Z.V., Khrshanovsky V.A. Terracottas in Funeral and Funeral Rituals (Based on Materials of Excavations of the Necropolises of the Ilurat Plateau) // Bulletin of the Russian State Humanitarian University: Literary Studies. Linguistics. Culturology. 2019. No. 1. pp. 46–58.
47. Kharko L.P. The cult of Aphrodite on the Cimmerian Bosporus // Brief reports of the Institute of the History of Material Culture. 1946. No. 13. S. 137–141.
48. Kharko L.P. On the five-column temple depicted on the Bosporan coins of the 2nd c. // VDI. 1950. No. 1. pp. 197–205.
49. Choref M.M. To the question of the time and circumstances of the appearance of images of the five-column temple on the coins of the Bosporan coin // Stratum plus. 2015. ¹6. pp. 111–130.
50. Schaub I.Yu. Myth, cult, ritual in the Northern Black Sea region (VII-IV centuries BC). St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg University Publishing House; Faculty of Philology, St. Petersburg State University, 2007. 484 p.
51. Schaub I.Yu. Death and rebirth: the afterlife of the Bosporans. St. Petersburg: Eurasia, 2020. 128 p.
52. Yaylenko V.P. Women, Aphrodite and the priestess of Spartokids in the new Bosporan inscriptions // Woman in the ancient world / Ed. L. P. Marinovich, S. Yu. Saprykina. M.: Nauka, 1995. S. 204–272.
53. S. V. Yartsev, V. G. Zubarev, and A. Yu. Greco-barbarian Crimea in late antiquity (III-IV centuries AD: from sea campaigns to the battle of Adrianople). Tula: TSPU im. L.N. Tolstoy, 2015. 720 p.
54. Yartsev S.V., Zubarev V.G., Shushunova E.V. Features of the cult of ancestors in the Northern Black Sea region of the Late Antiquity (based on the materials of the settlement "Belinskoe") // Materials on archeology and history of the ancient and medieval Black Sea region. 2021. No. 13. S. 578–602.
55. Alexandrescu Vianu M. Aphrodites orientales dans le basin du Pont-Euxin // Bulletin de Correspondance Hellénique. 1997. ¹ 121. P. 15–32.
56. Cyrino M.S. Aphodite (Gods and Heroes of the Ancient World). London; New York: Routledge, 2010. 155 p.
57. Rostovtzeff M. Le culte de la Grande Deesse dans la Russie meridionale // Revue des etudes grecques. 1921. V.32. P. 462–481.
58. Schefold K. Untersuchungen zu den Kertscher Vasen. Berlin; Leipzig: De Gruyter, 1934. 162 p.
59. Tsetsrhladze G.R., Kuznetsov V.D. On the Cult of Aphrodite in Kepoi // Periplous: Papers on Classical Art and Archaeology Presented to Sir John Boardman / G.R. Tsetskhladze (eds). London, 2000. P. 353–361.
60. Ustinova Ju. Supreme Gods of the Bosporan Kingdom. Celestial Aphrodite and the Most High God. Leiden; Boston; Köln: Brill, 1999. 321 p.

Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

The history of ancient Greek culture is of great interest and, after almost two thousand years, it will fall from its place. Indeed, such achievements as the theater, museums, the Olympic Games, and democracy have reached our days from the depths of time. There were echoes of Greek civilization on the territory of modern Russia, primarily in the Northern Black Sea region. In this regard, it is of interest to study various aspects of the social and spiritual history of ancient civilization in this region. These circumstances determine the relevance of the article submitted for review, the subject of which is the Chthonic origin in the revived cult of Aphrodite in the Northern Black Sea region in the first centuries of our era. The author sets out to examine certain aspects of ancient Greek mythology, as well as to show its transformation in the first centuries of our era. The work is based on the principles of analysis and synthesis, reliability, objectivity, the methodological basis of the research is a systematic approach, which is based on the consideration of the object as an integral complex of interrelated elements. The scientific novelty of the article lies in the very formulation of the topic: the author seeks to characterize the mysterious revival of this cult in the Northern Black Sea region during the Roman period and the emergence of a trend towards the archaization of religious ideas associated with it. Considering the bibliographic list of the article as a positive point, its scale and versatility should be noted: in total, the list of references includes up to 60 different sources and studies. From the sources attracted by the author, we will point to albums and catalogs, in particular the catalog of the collection of the East Crimean Historical and Cultural Museum-Reserve. Among the studies used, we note the works of E.V. Bulycheva, P.D. Diatroptov, N.V. Moleva and other authors, whose focus is on the religious aspects of the culture of the Northern Black Sea region. Note that the bibliography is important both from a scientific and educational point of view: after reading the text of the article, readers can turn to other materials on its topic. In general, in our opinion, the integrated use of various sources and research contributed to the solution of the tasks facing the author. The style of writing the article can be attributed to a scientific one, at the same time understandable not only to specialists, but also to a wide readership, to anyone interested in both the ancient Northern Black Sea region in general and the religious views of its inhabitants in particular. The appeal to the opponents is presented at the level of the collected information received by the author during the work on the topic of the article. The structure of the work is characterized by a certain logic and consistency, it can be distinguished by an introduction, the main part, and conclusion. At the beginning, the author defines the relevance of the topic, shows that "on the Bosporus, Aphrodite, despite her original, purely Hellenistic (in the Ionian version) character of the cult, later became revered mainly in the hypostasis of Urania (Heavenly), that is, with a fundamental indication of her unique divine power received from Uranus." The author shows that, like all other fertility goddesses, "Aphrodite was originally characterized by chthonic ideas." And at the same time, the revival of the cult of Aphrodite at the beginning of our era was also associated with the response of the Hellenistic population to the Roman cultural expansion. As the author of the reviewed article notes, "the mass glorification of their deceased relatives began to turn into a universal necessity, not only for the implementation of intermediary functions with the Chthonic world, but also for solving the most important sacred and protective tasks that in the first centuries of our era began to come to the fore in people's lives." The main conclusion of the article is that the main "reason for the emergence of the trend towards the archaization of the cult of Aphrodite in the Northern Black Sea region, nevertheless, were the features of the unfolding crisis of ancient ideology in the first centuries of our era." The article submitted for review is devoted to an urgent topic, will arouse readers' interest, and its materials can be used both in a course of lectures on the history of the ancient world and in various special courses. In general, in our opinion, the article can be recommended for publication in the journal "Man and Culture".
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.