Статья 'Кинопародия как постмодернистская деконструкция в кинематографе' - журнал 'Человек и культура' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Man and Culture
Reference:

Parody film as a postmodernist deconstruction in cinematography

Bedenko Vladimir Nikolaevich

External Doctoral Candidate, Russian State University of Cinematography named after S. M. Gerasimov

129226, Russia, g. Moscow, ul. Ul. Vil'gel'ma Pika, 3, of. -

bedencko.vlad@yandex.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

DOI:

10.25136/2409-8744.2021.2.34754

Review date:

28-12-2020


Publish date:

13-05-2021


Abstract: Lately, the research of Parody film as a part of film discourse have reached its peak in the history and philosophy of science. The polycode essence of the concept of film discourse prompts changes and modifications in the interpretation of Parody film. Therefore, the subject of this analysis is Parody film. The goal of this research consists in examination of the peculiarities, meaning, and role of the concept of “parody film”, which is a creative work intended to ridicule the plot through satirical or ironic imitation. Research methodology is based on the method of analytical study of sources for clarification of the logic and content of the concepts of “parody”, “parody film”, and “film discourse”, as well for revealing the essence of parody film as a postmodernist deconstruction in cinematography. The article also employs the methods of comparative analysis and the concept of local cultures. The scientific novelty of this research consists in systematization of the existing knowledge on parody film in the light of film discourse, which being the phenomenon at the intersection of multiple disciplines is in the epicenter of scientific inquiries in linguistics, literary studies, sociolinguistics, philosophy of semiotics and film semiotics, critical discourse analysis, and theory of cinematography. The theoretical importance lies in characterization of the concepts of “parody”, “parody film”, “comedy”, “comedy film” in the context of modern knowledge of moviemaking and cinematography. The acquired results give a better perspective on the role of parody film in art and life of the society. The Interpreters fight for cinema, on the one hand adoring it as the art with unlimited capabilities, while on the other – neglecting the fact that it should need the unpretentious demands of the audience. The author claims that in a broad context, the parody film of the XXI century is not aimed at parodying a literary text. The filmmakers rather consider and use parody film as a means for drawing attention of various life circumstances.


Keywords: humor, film industry, deconstruction, postmodernism, Director, cinema, cinema parody, Parody, satire, genre
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Azbuka kino / M. E. Zak.-M.: Soyuz kinematografistov Rossii, 1990.-S. 23.
2.
Andreev B. B. Esteticheskii fenomen ispolnitel'skogo masterstva v sovetskom kino: Avtoref. dis. kand. filosof, nauk. Tekst / B. B. Andreev // MGUKI.-M., 2004.-41 s.
3.
Ben'yamin V. Proizvedenie iskusstva v epokhu ego tekhnicheskoi vosproizvodimosti. Izbrannye esse / V. Ben'yamin.-M.: Medium, 1996.-121 s.
4.
Goryunova G. N. Organizatsiya proizvodstva kinofil'mov / G. N. Goryunova.-M.: Iskusstvo, 1983.-216 s.
5.
Dentit Saimon. Parodiya (Novaya kriticheskaya idioma). Rutledzh, 2000. – 205 s.
6.
Duet na vsyu zhizn': sekrety populyarnosti Tarapun'ki i Shtepselya [Elektronnyi resurs]. Rezhim dostupa: https://isroe.co.il/duet-na-vsyu-zhizn-sekrety-populyarnosti-tarapunki-i-shtepselya/ (data obrashcheniya-10 fevralya 2021 goda)
7.
Zhabskii M. I. Sotsiokul'turnaya drama kinematografa. Analiticheskaya letopis' (1969-2005 gg.) / M. I. Zhabskii.-M.: Kanon+, 2009.-775 s.
8.
Zhuravleva L. Rezhisser Nikolai Rasheev: «Svoego Bumbarasha ya vstretil v khrame…» / L. Zhurpvleva // Zerkalo nedeli.-№ 15.-17.04.2010.
9.
Istoriya otechestvennogo kino / E. Grachev.-M.: Progress-Traditsiya, 2005.-S. 391. – 528 s.
10.
Kinoslovar'. T 2 / Gl. red. S.I. Yutkevich.-M.: Sovetskaya entsiklopediya, 1970.-1424 s.
11.
Kino: Entsiklopedicheskii slovar' / gl. red. S.I. Yutkevich.-M.: Sovetskaya entsiklopediya, 1987.-640 s.
12.
Korte G. Vvedenie v sistemnyi kinoanaliz / G. Korte.-M.: Izd. dom Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki, 2018.-360 s.
13.
Kuznetsov S. «Krik» Uesa Kreivena ob''yasnyaet, kak khorrory vliyayut na zritelya [Elektronnyi resurs]. Rezhim dostupa: https://kinoart.ru/reviews/krik-uesa-kreyvena-obyasnyaet-kak-horrory-vliyayut-na-zritelya (data obrashcheniya-01 fevralya 2021 goda)
14.
Lebedev N. A. Vnimanie, kinematograf! O kino i kinovedenii. Stat'i, issledovaniya, vystupleniya.-M.: Iskusstvo, 1974.-439 s.
15.
Makki R. Istoriya na million dollarov: master-klass dlya stsenaristov, pisatelei i ne tol'ko / R. Makki.-M.: Al'pina non-fikshn, 2012.-456 s.
16.
Mol' A. Sotsiodinamika kul'tury / A. Mol'.-M.: Izdatel'stvo LKI, 2008.-416 s.
17.
Menvell R. Kino i zritel' / R. Menvell.-M.: Izdatel'stvo inostrannoi literatury, 1957.-280 s.
18.
Panomitros D. «Gegemon Fasosa i udovol'stvie ot parodii, drevnikh svidetel'stv i Evstafiya o parodiste», Protokoly XI Kongressa FIEC, t. 3, Afiny, 2004.-S. 504-513.
19.
Pervichko E.I. Strategii regulyatsii emotsii: protsessual'naya model' Dzh. Grossa i kul'turno-deyatel'nostnyi podkhod (rus.) / E.I. Pervichko // Natsional'nyi psikhologicheskii zhurnal.-2014.-T. 4.-№ 16.-S. 13-22.
20.
Pol Rota. Kinodokumentalisty mira v bitvakh nashego vremeni / Avtor-sostavitel' G. Gerlingkhauz.-M.: Raduga, 1986.-360 s. – S. 227.
21.
Saprykin S. Yu. Bosporskie syuzhety v dialoge Lukiana «Toksarid» / S.Yu. Saprykin // Aristei: Klassicheskaya filologiya i antichnaya istoriya.-2012.-1.-S. 185-209.
22.
Sotsiologiya i kinematograf / obshch. red. Zhabskogo M.I. M.: Kanon+, 2012.-600 s.
23.
Eko U. Zametki na polyakh «Imeni rozy» // Inostr. lit.-M.,1988.-№ 10.-S. 88-104.
24.
Altenloh E. Zur Sociologie des Kino. Die Kino-Unternehmung und die socialen Schichten ihrer Besucher. Jena, 1914. 102 p. URL: http://www.massenmedien.de/allg/altenloh/index.htm (date of the application: 21.02.2021)
25.
Lodge D. Working with structuralism: Essays a. reviews on 19th and 20th-century literature.-L., 1981.-XII. 207 p.
26.
Hutcheon Linda. A Poetics of Postmodernism: History, Theory, Fiction. NY: Routledge, 2004. 283 r.
27.
The compact Oxford English dictionary: complete text reproduced micrographically.-2nd ed.-Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991.-2386 pages.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website