DOI: 10.7256/2454-0595.2024.1.39943

Abstract: Personal search, seizure of things and documents are quite common measures of administrative and procedural influence, their purpose is to detect objects, substances, documents that are tools or means of committing an administrative offense. In other words, the appropriate measures of procedural influence are aimed at obtaining and securing evidence in the case of an administrative offense, and ultimately these measures contribute to improving the effectiveness of the execution of the decisions made in the case. In the course of the study, the author analyzed such a category as "personal inspection", assessed the legal regulation of this procedural event, drew attention to the need to improve the quality of both the organization of personal inspection, its procedural registration, as well as the need to respect the rights of the person in respect of whom personal inspection is carried out. The author shows the relationship of personal search with such procedural actions as the seizure of things and documents, as well as the relationship with delivery and administrative detention. The author cites various points of view regarding such a procedural action as "personal inspection", notes that personal inspection can also have a preventive function, this function of inspection is necessary in ensuring transport security, in countering the movement of things across the customs border. Personal search, as well as the seizure of things and documents, occupies an important place among the means of obtaining evidence in the proceedings on administrative offenses, and therefore, in order for the evidence to meet the requirement of admissibility, all necessary procedural requirements must be met during personal search. A personal search is a measure of procedural coercion, rather delicate, in this regard, actions that can humiliate a person are unacceptable during a personal search, the implementation of a personal search must be properly recorded.

DOI: 10.25136/2409-7810.2022.4.39449

Abstract: The article examines the essence of administrative-procedural coercion measures and how attention is drawn to the institution of administrative coercion, the definition of administrative-procedural coercion measures in its content. The paper concludes that procedural measures did not immediately appear in the construction of administrative coercion, this was due to the development of legislation on administrative responsibility, as well as legal doctrine. The problem of administrative coercion has been the subject of scientific attention for a long time. At one time, the research of the institute of administrative coercion even had a pro-Western character, where this coercion was used very widely. The author concludes that administrative and procedural coercion is aimed at suppressing administrative offenses, ensuring the proceedings on administrative offenses, as well as the execution of decisions taken within the framework of this proceeding. The author notes that within the framework of administrative and procedural coercion, coercive and restrictive measures of influence are applied, as well as non-coercive measures that are necessary to ensure the implementation of procedural coercion. Administrative and procedural coercion is aimed at suppressing administrative offenses, ensuring the proceedings in cases of administrative offenses, as well as the execution of decisions taken within the framework of this proceeding. It should be noted that within the framework of administrative and procedural coercion, coercive and restrictive measures of influence are applied, as well as non-coercive measures that are necessary to ensure the implementation of procedural coercion.