Статья 'Административная ответственность арбитражных управляющих по законодательству РФ и Украины: сравнительный анализ' - журнал 'Административное и муниципальное право' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Administrative and municipal law
Reference:

Astanin, G.V. Administrative responsibility of insolvency officers in legislations of the Russian Federation and Ukraine: comparative analysis.

Abstract: The article includes comparative analysis of the elements of the institution of administrative responsibility of insolvency officers under the current legislations of the Russian Federation and Ukraine. Most of attention is paid to the grounds for administrative responsibility and types of measures of administrative responsibility. The author notes similarities and differences in legislation and law-enforcement practice in two states. The attention is drawn to some topical issues of general theory of administrative responsibility, as applied to bankruptcy (insolvency).


Keywords:

insolvency officer, administrative responsibility, administrative offence, bankruptcy, insolvency, sanitation, entrepreneurs, corruption, legal entities, debtor, creditor


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Gorb E.E. Problematika privlecheniya arbitrazhnykh upravlyayushchikh k administrativnoy otvetstvennosti za narushenie zakonodatel'stva o nesostoyatel'nosti (bankrotstve) // Elektronnoe nauchnoe izdanie «Uchenye zametki TOGU». 2011. — T.
2. — № 2. 2. Dikhtyar A.I., Volkova N.A. Bankrotstvo: vneshnee upravlenie imushchestvom dolzhnika — yuridicheskogo litsa (sravnitel'nyy analiz po konkursnomu pravu Rossii i Ukrainy) // Yurist. — 2012. — № 12.
3. Kostennikov M.V., Kurakin A.V. Aktual'nye problemy administrativnogo prava. — M., 2013.
4. Luk'yanova E.G. Teoriya protsessual'nogo prava. — M., 2003.
5. Luk'yanets D.N. O protsessual'noy forme administrativnoy otvetstvennosti // Vestnik Zaporozhskogo natsi-onal'nogo universiteta. Yuridicheskie nauki. — 2012. — № 1.
6. Popova E.N. O standartizatsii deyatel'nosti arbitrazhnogo upravlyayushchego // Predprinimatel'skoe pravo. Prilozhenie Biznes i pravo v Rossii i za rubezhom. — 2011. — № 3.
7. Shivol'nik N.Sh. Protsedura bankrotstva po pravu Rossii i Ukrainy. — Kiev, 2008
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.