Статья 'Участие защитника по делам несовершеннолетних в уголовном процессе России и Армении' - журнал 'Административное и муниципальное право' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Administrative and municipal law
Reference:

Dilbandyan, S. A. Participation of Juvenile Crime Defenders in the Criminal Procedure in Russia and Armenia

Abstract: The article is devoted to the questions of participation of a juvenile crime defender in the court procedure on juvenile crime in Russia and Armenia. Considering peculiarities of a legal status of the accused and suspect in such affairs, the author believes it is important to provide them with a suitable legal assistance. The article also discuses certain issues related to defending tactics.


Keywords:

defender, advocate, defense, process, procedure, enforcement, the suspect, the accused, under-age, teacher


This article is unavailable for unregistered users. Click to login or register

References
1. Baranov A.M. O momente dopuska i obyazatel'nom uchastii zashchitnika v dosudebnom proizvodstve po UPK RF // Zakonodatel'stvo i praktika. — 2002. — № 1.
2. Gorbacheva E.V. Problemy regulirovaniya sudoproizvodstva po delam nesovershennoletnikh v UPK RF. // Materialy mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii «Ugolovno-protsessual'nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii: god pravoprimeneniya i prepodavaniya». — M., 2004.
3. Kondrusov E.V. Zashchitnik. Ponyatie, ego protsessual'noe polozhenie, dopusk zashchitnika k uchastiyu v dele, obyazatel'noe uchastie zashchitnika // Rossiyskiy sud'ya. — 2007. — № 3.
4. Motovilovker Ya., Shirshov M. Psikhicheskiy nedostatok obvinyaemogo kak uslovie obyazatel'nogo uchastiya za-shchitnika v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve // Sovetskaya yustitsiya. — 1983. — № 2.
5. Makarenko I.A. Zashchitnik kak garant soblyudeniya prav i zakonnykh interesov nesovershennoletnego obvinya-emogo // Zakon i pravo. — 2006. — № 12.
6. Mishchenko E.V. K voprosu ob uchastii zashchitnika v proizvodstve po delam nesovershennoletnikh // Pravo i gosudarstvo: teoriya i praktika. — 2006. — № 8.
7. Tetyuev S.V. K voprosu o zashchitnike nesovershennoletnego v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve (analiz chasti 2 stat'i 49 KPK RF) // Advokatskaya praktika. — 2007. — № 5.
8. Tetyuev S.V. Zashchitnik — obyazatel'nyy uchastnik proizvodstva po ugolovnym delam v otnoshenii nesover-shennoletnikh // Nauchnye trudy. Rossiyskaya akademiya yuridicheskikh nauk. Vyp.
9. V 3-kh tt. T. 3. — M., 2009. 9. Podol'nyy N.A. Vsegda li v interesakh doveritelya, chtoby advokat deystvoval v sootvetstvii s ego voley? // Advokatskaya praktika. — 2004. — № 3
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.