Общие основания разграничения подведомственности между судом общей юрисдикции и арбитражным судом по действующему российскому законодательству

Система Автоматизированная Издательства

doi:10.7256/2454-0595.2010.11.57732


	Journal Menu > Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium


	Journals in science databases


	About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents

Administrative and municipal law

Reference:

Nechaeva S.V. Common Ground for Delimitation of Jurisdiction between Court of General Jurisdiction and Arbitration Court in Accordance with the Russian Applicable Legislation. // Administrative and municipal law. 2010. № 11. P. 5-9. URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=57732

Nechaeva S.V. Common Ground for Delimitation of Jurisdiction between Court of General Jurisdiction and Arbitration Court in Accordance with the Russian Applicable Legislation.

Abstract: The question on common grounds for delimitation of jurisdiction between court of general jurisdiction and arbitration court has a great importance for academic and research spheres because the problem of delimitation of jurisdiction is often met in law enforcement practice. The author analyzes points of view expressed in legal literature regarding the most controversial aspects of the problem including the question about structural adequacy of the material and procedural aspects of the law and judicial service; about the relation between the object and subject of grounds for delimitation of jurisdiction between courts of general jurisdiction and arbitration courts.

Keywords:

arbitral procedure, arbitration court, civil procedure, civil law, delimitation of jurisdiction, subjective content of a dispute, court of general jurisdiction, economic dispute

This article is unavailable for unregistered users. Click to login or register

References

1. Andreeva T.K. Arbitrazhnye sudy v sudebnoy sisteme RF // Zhurnal Otechestvennye zapiski. — 2003. — № 2 (11).
2. Vavilin E.V. Vystuplenie na nauchno-metodologicheskom seminare «Yuridicheskiy protsess — problemy metodologii» // Pravovaya politika i pravovaya zhizn'. — 2004. — № 2.
3. Eliseev N.G. Razreshenie kolliziy podvedomstvennosti // Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika. 2007.
4. Zaytsev I.M. O kontseptsiyakh khozyaystvennogo i arbitrazhnogo protsessual'nogo prava // Voprosy teorii i praktiki grazhdanskogo protsessa: Mezhvuzovskiy nauchnyy sbornik. Vyp. 2. — Saratov, 1979.
5. Kallistratova R.F. K voprosu ob uchastnikakh arbitrazhnogo protsessa // Uchenye zapiski VIYuN. Vyp. 17. — M., 1963.
6. Kleandrov M.I. Ekonomicheskoe pravosudie v Rossii: proshloe, nastoyashchee, budushchee. — M., 2006.
7. Kozlova V.N. K voprosu ob opredelenii podvedomstvennosti del arbitrazhnomu sudu // Nalogi. — 2010. — № 2.
8. Kommentariy k Arbitrazhnomu protsessual'nomu kodeksu RF (postateynyy). 2-e izdanie, pererabotannoe i dopolnennoe / Pod red. P.V. Krasheninnikova. — M., 2009.
9. Popondopulo V.F. Sistema tret'ey vlasti: ot gorizontal'noy organizatsii k vertikal'noy // Zakon. — 2004. — № 10.
10. Slepchenko E.V. Grazhdanskoe sudoproizvodstvo v arbitrazhnykh sudakh. Chast' pervaya // Arbitrazhnyy i grazhdanskiy protsess. — 2010. — № 1.

Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.

Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.

Copyright protected by law of the Russian Federation.
Any materials may be published only with link to the source.
All violations of law are punishable by law. © NB-Media.