Статья 'К вопросу о криминализации массового распространения экстремистских материалов: некоторые дискуссионные аспекты' - журнал 'Административное и муниципальное право' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Administrative and municipal law
Reference:

К вопросу о криминализации массового распространения экстремистских материалов: некоторые дискуссионные аспекты

Beshukova Zarema Muratovna

Doctor of Law

Docent, the department of Criminal Law and Criminology, Adyghe State University

385000, Russia, respublika Adygeya, g. Maikop, ul. Pervomaiskaya, 208

zarema_b2008@mail.ru
Other publications by this author
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0595.2016.8.19823

Received:

21-07-2016


Published:

31-08-2016


Abstract: The paper is devoted to criminalization of mass distribution of extremist materials. The author analyzes the judicial practice materials on criminal cases regulated by the article 282 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, and on administrative cases regulated by the article 20.29 of the Code of Administrative Offences. The author states that investigative and judicial practice faces particular difficulties when distinguishing the mentioned offence from the crime established under the article 282 of the CC. The problem of distinguishing these illegal actions in the “border areas” is one of the most complicated problems of law enforcement. The research methodology is based on the general principles of the dialectical method. The author applies modern general scientific and specific research methods including logical and legal, comparative-legal, system-structural analysis and others. The author reveals certain shortcomings of anti-extremist legislation and the procedure of formation and the content of the federal list of extremist materials. Particularly, one and the same information material can be examined by court twice if it is represented in another form and fixed on another information carrier. The presence of such a possibility of avoidance of law disperses anti-extremist instruments and unreasonably extends the federal list of extremist materials. The author offers the ways to improve the legislation which can allow avoiding the multiplicity of judicial opinions on the alike issues. The author concludes that the necessary precondition of implementation of the suggestion about criminalization of mass distribution of extremist materials is systematization and analysis of extremist materials included in the published federal list. The author states that it is necessary to establish the so-called “white list” of information materials which should contain the materials which had been declared non-extremist by court. 


Keywords:

hate mongering, publication, information, extremist activity, federal list, crime, criminal law, criminalization, extremist materials, extremism

References
1. Federal'nyi zakon ot 25 iyulya 2002 g. № 114-FZ «O protivodeistvii ekstremistskoi deyatel'nosti» // SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
2. Beshukova Z.M. Prestupleniya, svyazannye s osushchestvleniem ekstremistskoi deyatel'nosti: sravnitel'no-pravovoe issledovanie: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Rostov-na-Donu, 2011. 27 s.
3. Fridinskii S.N. Protivodeistvie ekstremistskoi deyatel'nosti (ekstremizmu) v Rossii: sotsial'no-pravovoe i kriminologicheskoe issledovanie: avtoref. dis. ... d-ra yurid. nauk. M., 2011. 37 s.
4. Beshukova Z.M. Prestupleniya, svyazannye s osushchestvleniem ekstremistskoi deyatel'nosti (sravnitel'no-pravovoe issledovanie): monografiya. Pyatigorsk: RIA-KMV. – 2011. – 208 s.
5. Beshukova Z.M. Ob''ekt prestupleniya, predusmotrennogo st. 282 Ugolovnogo Kodeksa Rossiiskoi Federatsii: diskussionnye aspekty // Evraziiskii yuridicheskii zhurnal. 2012. № 1 (44). S. 105-106.
6. Kurs Sovetskogo ugolovnogo prava v shesti tomakh. M., 1970. T. IV. S. 187.
7. Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 28 iyunya 2011 g. № 11 «O sudebnoi praktike po ugolovnym delam o prestupleniyakh ekstremistskoi napravlennosti» // SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
8. Pogodin I.V. Zaklyuchenie eksperta – klyuchevoe sredstvo dokazyvaniya po delam ekstremistskoi napravlennosti // Rossiiskii sledovatel'. 2012. № 2. S. 7-10.
9. Beshukova Z.M. Ugolovnaya i administrativnaya otvetstvennost' za massovoe rasprostranenie ekstremistskikh materialov: kriterii razgranicheniya // Profilaktika ekstremistskoi deyatel'nosti: problemy i perspektivy: materialy kruglogo stola / pod obshch. red. F.M. Kobzareva, V.V. Merkur'eva – M.: Akad. Gen. prokuratury Ros. Federatsii, 2014. – S. 189-198.
10. Ofitsial'nyi sait prokuratury Novosibirskoi oblasti. URL: http://prokuratura-nso.ru/
11. URL: http://www.sova-center.ru/racism-xenophobia/news/counteraction/2009/03/d15419/
12. Sultanov A.R. Primenenie evropeiskikh standartov v grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve na primere problemy ekstremistskikh del // Advokat. 2010. № 8. S. 7-28.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.