MAIN PAGE
> Back to contents
Administrative and municipal law
Reference:
Narutto S.V.
Legal confirmation of the nomenclature of scientific specialities
// Administrative and municipal law.
2016. № 2.
P. 160-168.
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0595.2016.2.17695 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=17695
Нормативно-правовое закрепление номенклатуры научных специальностей
Narutto Svetlana Vasil'evna
Doctor of Law
Professor, Department of Constitutional and Municipal Law of Russia, the Kutafin Moscow State Law Academy.
123995, Russia, pgt. Moscow, ul. Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya, 9, of. 557
|
svetanarutto@yandex.ru
|
|
 |
Other publications by this author
|
|
|
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0595.2016.2.17695
Received:
23-01-2016
Published:
25-02-2016
Abstract:
The research object is legal regulation of the nomenclature of scientific specialities, in which candidate and doctor theses are defended. The research object is the nomenclature of scientific specialities. The article analyzes the stages of legal regulation of the nomenclature of scientific specialities, including the pre-revolutionary and the Soviet periods of scientific degrees granting. Special attention is paid to the problems of the contemporary legal regulation if the nomenclature of scientific specialities caused by the unreasonable introduction of new specialities. The author outlines the problem of composing and confirming scientific specialities descriptions. The author applies the dialectical method, the systems analysis, the logical, hermeneutical, and other general scientific methods of cognition. The author uses specific scientific and special methods: historical, comparative-legal, formal-legal and others. The author comes to the conclusion about the need for modernization of the existing nomenclature of scientific specialities, consolidation of scientific specialities, and about the importance of developing a procedure of inclusion of new specialities into the nomenclature. The author offers the mechanism of this procedure. The study substantiates the reasonability of legal confirmation of the procedure of composition and approval of scientific specialities descriptions, which allow differentiating one speciality from another.
References
1. Krivoruchenko V.K. Prisuzhdenie uchenykh stepenei v Rossii v pervoi polovine XIX veka //http://www.mosgu.ru/nauchnaya/publications/professor.ru/Krivoruchenko_VK/
2. Yakushev A.N. Razvitie otechestvennoi nomenklatury spetsial'nostei nauchnykh rabotnikov v oblasti yurisprudentsii: vyzovy sovremennosti // Yuridicheskoe obrazovanie i nauka. 2013. № 4. S. 11-17.
3. Voropaev I.G. Poryadok prisuzhdeniya uchenykh stepenei v Rossii i SSSR (1802 – 1955): Avtoref. dis. … kand. yur. nauk. Saratov, 2000. //http://www.dslib.net/teoria-prava/porjadok-prisuzhdenija-uchenyh-stepenej-v-rossii-i-sssr-1802-1995.html#964241
4. Stolyarov Yu.N. «Dokumental'naya informatsiya» v gosudarstvennoi Nomenklature spetsial'nostei nauchnykh rabotnikov // http://www.gpntb.ru/ntb/ntb/2011/11/ntb_11_1_2011-stolyarov.pdf
5. Kul'kina I.V. Pravovoe regulirovanie deyatel'nosti Vysshei attestatsionnoi komissii SSSR v sfere prisuzhdeniya uchenykh stepenei (1934-1991 gg.): Avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Vladimir, 2008.
6. Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. 1996. № 35. St. 4137.
7. Byulleten' normativnykh aktov federal'nykh organov ispolnitel'noi vlasti. 2009. № 20.
8. Ofitsial'nyi internet-portal pravovoi informatsii http://www.pravo.gov.ru. 2015. 23 aprelya.
9. Sharshunov V.A., Gul'ko N.V. Kak podgotovit' i zashchitit' dissertatsiyu: istoriya, opyt, metodika i rekomendatsii. URL: http://www.aspirinby.org.
10. Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. 2013. № 40 (chast' III). St. 5072.
11. Petrov S.M., Grudtsyna L.Yu. K voprosu o reformirovanii sistemy attestatsii nauchnykh i nauchno-pedagogicheskikh kadrov // Yuridicheskoe obrazovanie i nauka. 2013. № 1. S. 23-30.
12. Ivanyuk O.A., Rafalyuk E.E. Modernizatsiya nomenklatury spetsial'nostei nauchnykh rabotnikov v sfere yurisprudentsii // Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava. 2011. № 6. S. 124-129.
13. Bachilo I.L., Kopylov V.A. Est' li osnovaniya dlya sozdaniya otrasli «Informatsionnoe pravo» // Informatsionnoe obshchestvo. 1999. № 6. S. 54.
14. Vlasenko N.A. O nomenklature spetsial'nostei nauchnykh rabotnikov v oblasti yurisprudentsii // Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava. 2010. № 7. S. 98-109.
15. Biomeditsinskoe pravo v Rossii i za rubezhom: monografiya / G.B. Romanovskii, N.N. Tarusina, A.A. Mokhov i dr. M.: Prospekt, 2015. S. 87.
16. Demichev A.A. Istoriya gosudarstva i prava kak samostoyatel'naya nauchnaya spetsial'nost' // Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava. 2013. № 11. S. 98-103.
17. Ivanyuk O.A., Rafalyuk E.E. Modernizatsiya nomenklatury spetsial'nostei nauchnykh rabotnikov v sfere yurisprudentsii // Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava. 2011. № 6. S. 124-129.
18. Matskevich I.M., Vlasenko N.A. Formalizatsiya spetsial'nostei nauchnykh issledovanii v sfere prava: soderzhanie i perspektivy // Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava. 2013. № 6. S. 116-121.
19. Voronov A.F. Predmet nauki grazhdanskogo protsessa // Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa. 2013. № 2. S. 8-59.
20. Matskevich I.M. O pasporte nauchnykh spetsial'nostei // Informatsionnoe pravo. 2015. № 1. S. 4-9.
21. Nauchno-prakticheskii kommentarii k Federal'nomu zakonu ot 23 avgusta 1996 g. № 127-FZ «O nauke i gosudarstvennoi nauchno-tekhnicheskoi politike» (postateinyi) / L.Yu. Grudtsyna, Yu.A. Dmitriev, S.A. Ivanova i dr.; pod red. V.E. Usanova. M.: YuRKOMPANI, 2012.
Link to this article
You can simply select and copy link from below text field.
|
