MAIN PAGE
> Back to contents
Administrative and municipal law
Reference:
Vinokurov A.Y.
On particular issues of prosecutor’s participation in administrative proceedings
// Administrative and municipal law.
2016. ¹ 2.
P. 178-182.
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0595.2016.2.17373 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=17373
Î íåêîòîðûõ âîïðîñàõ ó÷àñòèÿ ïðîêóðîðà â àäìèíèñòðàòèâíîì ñóäîïðîèçâîäñòâå
Vinokurov Alexander Yurievich
Doctor of Law
Director of the Research and Development Centre at the Academy of the Office of the Prosecutor General of the Russian Federation
117463, Russia, Moscow, pr-d Karamzina, 1 -1, app. 355
|
vinalexur
|
|
|
Other publications by this author |
|
|
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0595.2016.2.17373
Received:
23-12-2015
Published:
25-02-2016
Abstract:
The research subject is the range of general questions of the prosecutor’s legal status as a participant of administrative proceedings, regulated by the recently adopted Code of Administrative Code Proceedings of the Russian Federation. The author compares the Code’s provisions with the existing Civil Procedural Code of the Russian Federation, emphasizes the positive sides of the novels and criticizes the shortcomings of legal regulation of the issues under consideration, offers the ways to improve legal norms. The author applies the comparative-legal method to compare the provisions of the legislation, regulating administrative and civil proceedings. The author defines the advantages of the novels, added to the legal status of the prosecutor, involved in administrative proceedings, and draws attention to the particular drawbacks in procedural legislation formulae, offering the possible ways of their improvement. This research is one of the first scientific works, devoted to the legal status of the prosecutor, involved in administrative proceedings.
References
1. SZ RF. – 2015. – ¹ 10. – St. 1391 (s posled. izmeneniyami).
2. SZ RF. – 2014. – ¹ 34. – St. 4398.
3. SZ RF. – 2002. – ¹ 1 (ch. 1). – St. 1 (s posled. izmeneniyami).
4. SZ RF. – 2002. – ¹ 30. – St. 3012 (s posled. izmeneniyami).
5. SZ RF. – 2002. – ¹ 46. – St. 4532 (s posled. izmeneniyami).
6. Sakhnova T.V. Dostizhimo li edinstvo tsivilisticheskogo protsessa? (v kontekste kontseptsii edinogo GPK RF i Kodeksa administrativnogo sudo-proizvodstva) // Arbitrazhnyi i grazhdanskii protsess. – 2015. – ¹ 4. – S. 3 – 10; Serkov P.P. Aktual'nye voprosy sovershenstvovaniya administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva v Rossiiskoi Federatsii // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. – 2015. – ¹ 2. – S. 29 – 33 i dr.
7. SZ RF. – 1995. – ¹ 47. – St. 4472 (s posled. izmeneniyami).
8. Nasonov Yu.G., Vyskub V.S. O nedostatkakh pravovogo regulirovaniya uchastiya prokurora v administrativnom sudoproizvodstve // Vestnik Akademii General'noi prokuratury Rossiiskoi Federatsii. – 2015. – ¹ 5. – S. 60-66.
Link to this article
You can simply select and copy link from below text field.
|