Ñòàòüÿ 'Ê âîïðîñó î äîïóñòèìîñòè ðàññìîòðåíèÿ îðãàíàìè ïðîêóðàòóðû àíîíèìíûõ ñîîáùåíèé' - æóðíàë 'Àäìèíèñòðàòèâíîå è ìóíèöèïàëüíîå ïðàâî' - NotaBene.ru
ïî
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Administrative and municipal law
Reference:

Ê âîïðîñó î äîïóñòèìîñòè ðàññìîòðåíèÿ îðãàíàìè ïðîêóðàòóðû àíîíèìíûõ ñîîáùåíèé

Vinokurov Alexander Yurievich

Doctor of Law

Director of the Research and Development Centre at the Academy of the Office of the Prosecutor General of the Russian Federation

117463, Russia, Moscow, pr-d Karamzina, 1 -1, app. 355

vinalexur
Other publications by this author
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0595.2016.1.17174

Received:

02-12-2015


Published:

15-02-2016


Abstract: The article studies the consideration of anonymous appeals by prosecution agencies. The object of the research is the range of legal relations, arising when dealing with anonymous appeals, their registration and consideration by prosecution agencies. The author pays special attention to the fact that the current legislation doesn’t prohibit consideration of anonymous appeals, containing information about offences, by prosecution agencies, but the legislation in this sphere should be improved. The author applies the comparative-historical method; he analyzes the provisions of various legal acts and different sources, and comes to the conclusion about the need for a more clear and consistent legal regulation of the legal regime of anonymous appeals, containing information about imminent crimes, the crimes that are being or had been committed, aimed at legal provisions adjustment. 


References
1. Svod zakonov SSSR. – T. 1. – S. 373.
2. SZ RF. – 2006. – ¹ 19. – St. 2060 (s posled. izmeneniyami).
3. Ivanova E. Anonimnye «mstiteli» // EZh-Yurist. – 2008.-¹ 2.
4. Glushko E.K. Federal'nyi zakon ot 2 maya 2006 g. ¹ 59-FZ «O po-ryadke rassmotreniya obrashchenii grazhdane Rossiiskoi Federatsii»: postateinyi kommen-tarii // Ezhegodnik Tsentra publichno-pravovykh issledovanii. Tom 2. – M.: ANO «Tsentr publichno-pravovykh issledovanii», 2007.
5. Smushkin A.B. Kommentarii k Federal'nomu zakonu ot 2 maya 2006 g. ¹ 59-FZ «O poryadke rassmotreniya obrashchenii grazhdan Rossiiskoi Federatsii» // podgotovlen dlya sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus», 2014.
6. SZ RF. – 1995. – ¹ 47. – St. 4472 (s posled. izmeneniyami).
7. Zakonnost'. – 2008. – ¹ 3 (s posled. izmeneniyami).
8. Vinokurov A.Yu. Trebovanie prokurora o provedenii pro-verki // Zakonnost'. – 2012. – ¹ 2. – S. 19-22.
9. SZ RF. – 2008. – ¹ 52 (ch. 1). – St. 6249 (s posled. izmeneniyami).
10. Zakonnost'. – 2013. – ¹ 4.
11. Zakonnost'. – 2008. – ¹ 3.
12. SZ RF. – 1995. – ¹ 33. – St. 3349 (s posled. izmeneniyami).
13. SZ RF. – 2001. – ¹ 52 (ch. 1). – St. 4921 (s posled. izmeneniyami).
14. SZ RF. – 1999. – ¹ 28. – St. 3466 (s posled. izmeneniyami).
15. SZ RF. – 1999. – ¹ 42. – St. 4505 (s posled. izmeneniyami).
16. SZ RF. – 2013. – ¹ 19. – St. 2306 (s posled. izmeneniyami).
17. SZ RF. – 2009. – ¹ 39. – St. 4588 (s posled. izmeneniyami).
18. SZ RF. – 2009. – ¹ 39. – St. 4589 (s posled. izmeneniyami).
19. SZ RF. – 2010. – ¹ 27. – St. 3446 (s posled. izmeneniyami).
20. SZ RF. – 2013. – ¹ 23. – St. 2892 (s posled. izmeneniyami).
21. SZ RF. – 2015. – ¹ 13. – St. 1909 (s posled. izmeneniyami).
22. SZ RF. – 2009. – ¹ 7. – St. 776 (s posled. izmeneniyami).
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.