|
MAIN PAGE
> Back to contents
Administrative and municipal law
Reference:
Gorian E.
Formation of subzones of special economic zones in the USA
// Administrative and municipal law.
2015. № 10.
P. 1029-1038.
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0595.2015.10.16480 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=16480
Становление института подзоны особой экономической зоны в США
Gorian Ella
ORCID: 0000-0002-5962-3929
PhD in Law
Associate Professor, Vladivostok State University
690014, Russia, Primorsky Krai, Vladivostok, Gogol str., 41, office 5502
|
ella-gorjan@yandex.ru
|
|
 |
Other publications by this author
|
|
|
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0595.2015.10.16480
Received:
27-09-2015
Published:
1-4.61538461538-2015
Abstract:
The subject of the research is a subzone of a special economic zone in the USA. The model of a special economic zone in the USA has been improving for 80 years, and it is one of the best in the world. The institution of a subzone is of a special scientific and practical interest since it gives the opportunity to apply this regime not only to a territory, but also to an enterprise (industrial complex). The author studies one of the main judicial precedents which had defined the main features of a subzone and influenced their widespread use in the USA. Along with general and specific methods of scientific cognition, the author applies the comparative-legal method which allows defining the main features of this institution, typical for different legal systems. The necessity to discuss the possibility of use of subzones is undoubtful since the existing Russian model of a special economic zone doesn’t provide the opportunity to take an active position in the global economic system. The author suggests using the American model as an example. As the subzone’s status is granted mainly to enterprises (industrial complexes), any enterprise which is not a part of a special economic zone can use the preferences and privileges of a “common” special economic zone and develop production. This issue should be studied and considered not only from the viewpoint of foreign economic activity regulation, but also from the viewpoint of administrative, municipal and customs law.
Keywords:
foreign trade zone, subzone, precedent, international trade, judgement, international treaty, industry, operating, LASH transportation, custom duties
References
1. Singa Boyenge J.-P. ILO Database on Export Processing Zones (Revised): Working Paper, April 2007, Geneva [Elektronnyi resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: http://econpapers.repec.org/paper/iloilowps/398959.htm (data obrashcheniya: 27.09.2015)
2. Pavlov P.V. Osobye ekonomicheskie zony kak mekhanizm effektivnogo razvitiya mezhdunarodnoi investitsionnoi i innovatsionnoi deyatel'nosti // NB: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya.-2013.-№ 1.-S.51-144. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4226.2013.1.638.
3. Bolle, M.J., Williams, B.R. U.S. Foreign-Trade Zones: Background and Issues for Congress. November 12, 2013. [Elektronnyi resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: http://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R42686.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 27.09.2015)
4. Engman M., Onodera O., Pinali E. Export Processing Zones: Past and Future Role in Trade and Development // OECD Trade Policy Papers 53, OECD Publishing [Elektronnyi resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: https://ideas.repec.org/p/oec/traaab/53-en.html (data obrashcheniya: 27.09.2015)
5. The Foreign-Trade Zones Act 1934 [Elektronnyi resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: http://enforcement.trade.gov/ftzpage/grantee/regs.html (data obrashcheniya: 27.09.2015)
6. FTZ Board regulations (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u) [Elektronnyi resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: http://enforcement.trade.gov/ftzpage/grantee/regs.html (data obrashcheniya: 27.09.2015)
7. Armco Steel Corporation v. H Stans M R H 431 F2d 779 (2d Cir. 1970) [Elektronnyi resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: http://openjurist.org/431/f2d/779 (data obrashcheniya: 27.09.2015)
8. Fountain v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., 387 F.2d 343, 344 (5 Cir. 1967) [Elektronnyi resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: http://openjurist.org/387/f2d/343 (data obrashcheniya: 27.09.2015)
9. Consolo v. Federal Maritime Commission (383 U.S. 607, 619-621, 86 S.Ct. 1018, 16 L.Ed.2d 131 (1966) [Elektronnyi resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: http://openjurist.org/383/us/607 (data obrashcheniya: 27.09.2015)
10. Udall v. Tallman (380 U.S. 1, 16, 85 S.Ct. 792, 801, 13 L.Ed.2d 616 (1965) [Elektronnyi resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: http://openjurist.org/380/us/1 (data obrashcheniya: 27.09.2015)
11. Power Reactor Development Co. v. International Union, etc., 367 U.S. 396, 408, 81 S.Ct. 1529, 1535, 6 L.Ed.2d 924 (1961) [Elektronnyi resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: http://openjurist.org/367/us/396/power-reactor-development-co-v-international-union-of-electrical-radio-and-machine-workers (data obrashcheniya: 27.09.2015)
12. Norwegian Nitrogen Co. v. United States, 288 U.S. 294, 315, 53 S.Ct. 350, 77 L.Ed. 796 (1933) [Elektronnyi resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: http://openjurist.org/288/us/294/norwegian-nitrogen-products-co-v-united-states (data obrashcheniya: 27.09.2015)
13. Goryan E.V. Perspektivy sozdaniya osoboi ekonomicheskoi zony «svobodnyi port Vladivostoka»: sravnitel'no-pravovoi analiz // Pravo i politika. – 2015. – № 4. – S. 467-475. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2015.4.1478
14. Yu.V. Volokitina Poryadok realizatsii gosudarstvennoi
innovatsionnoi politiki putem
ispol'zovaniya pravovogo potentsiala
otechestvennykh OEZ // Trendy i upravlenie. - 2013. - 2. - C. 236 - 240. DOI: 10.7256/2307-9118.2013.2.5166.
15. P.V. Pavlov Evolyutsiya pravovogo regulirovaniya
instituta svobodnykh ekonomicheskikh zon
v Rossii i za rubezhom // Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya / Journal of foreighn legislation and comparative law. - 2011. - 4. - C. 81 - 91.
16. A.S. Emel'yanov Administrativno-pravovaya doktrina, idei
liberalizma i razvitie gosudarstvennosti v Rossii // Politika i Obshchestvo. - 2013. - 2. - C. 220 - 225. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2013.02.13.
Link to this article
You can simply select and copy link from below text field.
|
|
