Статья 'Трибуналы и административная система Англии' - журнал 'Административное и муниципальное право' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Administrative and municipal law
Reference:

Трибуналы и административная система Англии

Shutilina Ol'ga Alexandrovna

Lecturer at Tambov State Technical University, Department of Theory and History of state and law

392000, Russia, Tambovskaya oblast', g. Tambov, ul. Sovetskaya, 106, of. 16

shutilina.o@yandex.ru
Other publications by this author
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0595.2015.10.16406

Received:

16-09-2015


Published:

1-4.61538461538-2015


Abstract: One of the key moments of the article is the fact that tribunals are a special alternative to the traditional way of judicial control. The reform of administrative review mechanisms and the system of tribunals in England came into effect on November 3, 2008; this article considers the structure and the composition of this reformed system. Tribunals oversight remains the important guarantee of regulation and limitation of their functioning. The author shows the discussion of the peculiarities which can be implemented by any controlling authority. The methodology of the research comprises the general scientific methods of cognition including the systems analysis, the complex approach, the comparative-legal, formal-logical, system-structural, formal-legal and legal-technical methods. The author concludes that the chief importance of these developments is that the Tribunals Service doesn't depend anymore on the related department in the questions of resources and staff. Cooperation between the controlling Executive body of the Tribunals Service and the tribunals of the judicial system has led to the expansion of the spectrum of service provision to the users of tribunals. Possibly the most important aspect of the tribunal reforms is that tribunal decisions are no longer viewed as second-rate or weak judicial decisions. The combined function of the Upper Tribunal puts it in a difficult situation in England. Formally its authoruty is limited to the appeals related to the legality of the decision, but at the same time it has the same authorities as the first-tier tribunal; this situation leads to the overlay of ideas and notions in the system. 


Keywords:

administrative tribunals, merits review, upper tribunals, first-tier tribunals, appeal, judicial review, legality, reasons, finality, reform

References
1. Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement. Act 2007. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2007/
2. Transforming Tribunals. S. 28.
3. Statistika uslug tribunalov za noyabr'2010g. http://www.justice.gov.uk/publications/ docs/tribunals-stats-q2-2010-11.pdf
4. Carnwath. Some Jottings on Administrative Justice : The Future of Administrative Justice Symposium. Toronto. 2008. http://www.law.utoronto.ca/documents/conferences/adminjustice08
5. Wade & Forsyth Administrative Law. S. 781.
6. Carnwath Tribunals Judiciary : 4th International Conference on Administrative Justice Without Borders-Developments in the United Kingdom. Toronto, 2007. S. 8.
7. Hale Administrative Justice and Tribunals Council: Annual Report. 2009/2010. S. 6.
8. Carnwarth Tribunal Reform in the UK. 2008. S. 7.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.