Статья 'К вопросу о качествах личности субъекта административного правонарушения ' - журнал 'Административное и муниципальное право' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Administrative and municipal law
Reference:

К вопросу о качествах личности субъекта административного правонарушения

Kurakin Aleksei Valentinovich

Doctor of Law

Professor at the Department of Administrative and Information Law of the Financial University Under the Government of the Russian Federation

125993, Russia, Moskva oblast', g. Moscow, ul. 125993, Moskva, Leningradskii, 49

kurakinaleksey@gmail.com
Other publications by this author
 

 
Kostennikov Mikhail Valer'evich

Doctor of Law

 
Professor, the department of Personnel Training in the sphere of Public Security, All-Russian Advanced Training Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation
 

142008, Russia, Moskovskaya obl., Domodedovo, mkrn. Aviatsinnyi, ul. Pikhtovaya, 3.

m-2263768@yandex.ru
Other publications by this author
 

 
Myshlyaev Nikolai Prokof'evich

Doctor of Law

Professor at Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Department of Administrative and Information Law

Russia, Moskovskaya oblast, Moscow, Leningradskiy prospekt, 49.

myslaevnp@mail.com
Other publications by this author
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0595.2015.8.15794

Received:

08-07-2015


Published:

15-09-2015


Abstract: The subject of the research is a range of legal and organizational problems of administrative-legal regulation of identification of a subject of an administrative offence. The authors carry out a theoretical and legal analysis of the concepts of legal regulation of the subject of an administrative offence characterizing. The article presents the authors’ positions on the notion of administrative-legal prevention of offences and ascertainment of personal and professional qualities of the subject of administrative offence. Special attention is paid to the development of methods and methodology of administrative-legal regulation of offences prevention. The authors carry out a theoretical and legal analysis of the concepts of preventive activities in the sphere of administrative-legal regulation. The article presents the authors’ positions on the interpretation and legal regulation of these categories. The methodology of the research is based on the recent achievements of epistemology. The authors use the general philosophical and theoretical methods (dialectics, the systems method, analysis, synthesis, analogy, deduction, observation, modeling), the traditional legal methods (formal logical) and the methods used in special sociological research (the statistical methods, expert assessments, etc.). The authors conclude that at present it is necessary to enhance forms and methods of ascertainment of personal and professional qualities of a subject of an offence in order to provide law and order in the sphere of administrative law application. The main contribution of the authors is the declaration of the need to develop administrative-legal regulation of the revelation of potential subjects of administrative offences. The novelty of the research lies in the proposals about the development of forms and methods of administrative-legal regulation of preventive activities and the creation of legal and organizational guarantees of legality in Russia.  


Keywords:

motivation, coercion, sanction, punishment, delict, offence, trait, offender, personality, guilt

References
1. Kratkii slovar' po sotsiologii / Pod red. D.M. Gvishiani, N.I. Lapina (sost. E.M. Korzheva, N.F. Naumova). M., 1989. S. 142.
2. Kudryavtsev V.N. Pravovoe povedenie: norma i patologiya. M., 1982. S. 198.
3. Kudryavtsev V.N. Prichiny pravonarushenii. M., 1976. S. 191.
4. Lozbyakov V.P. Kriminologicheskie osnovy administrativno-yurisdiktsionnoi deyatel'nosti rossiiskoi militsii: Dis… d-ra. yurid. nauk. M., 1995. – S. 34.
5. Lozbyakov V.P. Kriminologicheskie osnovy administrativno-yurisdiktsionnoi deyatel'nosti rossiiskoi militsii: Dis… d-ra. yurid. nauk. M., 1995. S. 34.
6. Kriminal'naya motivatsiya // Pod obshch. red. V.N. Kudryavtseva. M. «Nauka», 1986. S. 103.
7. Genzyuk E.E. Administrativnaya deliktologiya: Dis…d-ra. yurid. nauk. M., 2001. S. 107.
8. Kudryavtsev V.N. Prichiny pravonarushenii. M., 1976. S. 189.
9. Platonov K.K. Psikhologicheskaya struktura lichnosti / V kn.: Lichnost' pri sotsializme. M., 1974. S. 69
10. Stefanov N. Obshchestvennye nauki i sotsial'naya tekhnologiya. M., 1976. S. 99.
11. Kudryavtsev V.N. Prichiny pravonarushenii. M., 1976. S. 191.
12. Kudryavtsev V.N. Prichiny pravonarushenii. M., 1976. S. 192.
13. Lomov B.F. Metodologicheskie i teoreticheskie problemy psikhologii. M., 1984. S. 204.
14. Luneev V.V. Motivatsiya prestupnogo povedeniya. M., 1984. S. 103.
15. Volkov B.S. Motivy prestuplenii. Kazan'. 1982.
16. Lozbyakov V.I., Ovchinskii S.S. Administrativno-pravovye mery preduprezhdeniya prestupnosti. M., 1978. S. 31.
17. Kudryavtsev V.N., Remnev V.I. Izuchenie dinamiki pravonarushenii i ee prichiny // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 1984. № 8. S. 24.
18. Kudryavtsev V.N. Yuridicheskii konflikt // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 1995, № 9. S. 10.
19. Zelentsov A.B. Konflikty v upravlenii i upravlenie konfliktami: opyt kompleksnogo issledovaniya predmeta i form administrativnoi yurisdiktsii. M., 2001. S. 172.
20. Zelentsov A.B. Konflikty v upravlenii i upravlenie konfliktami: opyt kompleksnogo issledovaniya predmeta i form administrativnoi yurisdiktsii. – M., 2001. S. 178.
21. Dubinin N.P., Karpets I.I., Kudryavtsev V.N. Genetika. Povedenie. Otvetstvennost'. M., 1982. S. 151.
22. Dyakin V.Ya. Preduprezhdenie organami vnutrennikh del administrativnykh pravonarushenii, posyagayushchikh na obshchestvennyi poryadok: Dis…kand. yurid. nauk. M., 1990.
23. Gertsenzon A.A. Ugolovnoe pravo i sotsiologiya. M., 1970. S. 144.
24. Kondrashkov N.N. Kolichestvennye metody v kriminologii. M., 1971. S. 160.
25. Lichnost' prestupnika. M., 1971. S. 77.
26. Dyuzhaev A.V. Retsidiv administrativnykh pravonarushenii: Dis… kand. yurid. nauk. M., 1978.
27. Agapov A.B. K voprosu o publichnom prinuzhdenie v rossiiskom prave // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. - 2013. - 7. - C. 58 - 87. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.7.9922. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_9922.html
28. Kostennikov M.V., Kurakin A.V. K voprosu ob osnovanii administrativnoi otvetstvennosti v rossiiskom prave // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. - 2013. - 10. - C. 75 - 88. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.10.10153. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_10153.html
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.