|
MAIN PAGE
> Back to contents
Administrative and municipal law
Reference:
Kurakin A.V., Kostennikov M.V., Myshlyaev N.P.
On the issue of the reasons and the conditions of administrative delicts
// Administrative and municipal law.
2015. ¹ 2.
P. 152-159.
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0595.2015.2.14281 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=14281
Ê âîïðîñó î ïðè÷èíàõ è óñëîâèÿõ àäìèíèñòðàòèâíîé äåëèêòíîñòè
Kurakin Aleksei Valentinovich
Doctor of Law
Professor at the Department of Administrative and Information Law of the Financial University Under the Government of the Russian Federation
125993, Russia, Moskva oblast', g. Moscow, ul. 125993, Moskva, Leningradskii, 49
|
kurakinaleksey@gmail.com
|
|
 |
Other publications by this author
|
|
Kostennikov Mikhail Valer'evich
Doctor of Law
Professor, the department of Personnel Training in the sphere of Public Security, All-Russian Advanced Training Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation
142008, Russia, Moskovskaya obl., Domodedovo, mkrn. Aviatsinnyi, ul. Pikhtovaya, 3.
|
|
m-2263768@yandex.ru
|
|
 |
Other publications by this author
|
|
|
Myshlyaev Nikolai Prokof'evich
Doctor of Law
Professor at Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Department of Administrative and Information Law
Russia, Moskovskaya oblast, Moscow, Leningradskiy prospekt, 49.
|
|
myslaevnp@mail.com
|
|
|
Other publications by this author
|
|
|
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0595.2015.2.14281
Received:
24-01-2015
Published:
08-03-2015
Abstract:
1. The subject of the article includes legal and organizational problems of revelation of causes and conditions of administrative delicts. The object of the article is a range of public relations in the sphere of prevention and prophylaxis of administrative offences. The authors pay special attention to the forms and methods of activities of state power and administration bodies aimed at the prevention of administrative offences. Special attention is paid to the theory of this problem; the article formulates the proposals about the improvement of the legislation in the sphere of administrative offences. Also, special attention is concentrated on the logical connection of administrative offences and criminal delicts. 2. The methodology of the research is based on the up-to-date achievements of epistemology. The authors use the general philosophical, theoretical methods (dialectics, the system method, analysis, synthesis, analogy, deduction, observation), the traditional legal methods, and the methods used in specific sociological researches. 3. The main conclusions of the research relate to the improvement of the legislation on administrative offences. The originality of this paper consists in the fact that it presents a comprehensive evaluation of public authorities' activities in the sphere of offences prevention; substantiates the use of the system approach in the sphere of crimes and administrative offences prevention. The specific contribution of the article consists in the conclusion that the achievement of significant results in provision of the rule of law and protection of the rights of citizens from various illegal encroachments is possible only on the basis of a complex approach to crime prevention.
References
1. Karpets I.I. Prestupnost' kak real'nost' // Voprosy filosofii. – 1989. – ¹ 5. – S. 97.
2. Lazarev B.M., Lunev A.E. Osnovy zakonodatel'stva ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. – 1981. – ¹ 4. – S. 25.
3. Lozbyakov V.P. Kriminologicheskie osnovy administrativno-yurisdiktsionnoi deyatel'nosti rossiiskoi militsii: Dis… d-ra. yurid. nauk. M., 1995.
4. Kudryavtsev V.N. Prichiny pravonarushenii. – M., 1976. – S. 8.
5. Stolbovoi A.P. Administrativno-predupreditel'nye mery militsii kak sredstvo bor'by s pravonarusheniyami v usloviyakh razvitogo sotsializma: Avtoref. diss…kand. yurid. nauk. – Kiev, 1984. – S. 8.
6. Petrunina I.K. K voprosu o prichinakh administrativnykh pravonarushenii v torgovle // Aktual'nye problemy administrativnoi deliktologii. – Kiev, 1984. – S. 84.
7. Petrunina I.K. K voprosu o prichinakh administrativnykh pravonarushenii v torgovle // Aktual'nye problemy administrativnoi deliktologii. – Kiev, 1984. – S. 84.
8. Antonyan Yu.M. Rol' konkretnoi zhiznennoi situatsii v sovershenii prestupleniya. – M., 1973.
9. Mel'nik N.G. Prichiny i profilaktika administrativno-nakazuemykh narushenii pasportnoi sistemy // Administrativno-deliktnye otnosheniya. Kiev, 1979. –S. 132.
10. Mel'nik N.G. Prichiny i profilaktika administrativno-nakazuemykh narushenii pasportnoi sistemy // Administrativno-deliktnye otnosheniya. Kiev, 1979. –S. 134.
11. Remnev V.I. Aktual'nye voprosy administrativnoi deliktologii v sovremennyi period // Aktual'nye problemy administrativnoi deliktologii. –Kiev, 1984. – S. 13.
12. Remnev V.I. Aktual'nye voprosy administrativnoi deliktologii v sovremennyi period // Aktual'nye problemy administrativnoi deliktologii. –Kiev, 1984. – S. 13.
13. Mel'nik N.G. Prichiny i profilaktika administrativno-nakazuemykh narushenii pasportnoi sistemy // Administrativno-deliktnye otnosheniya. Kiev, 1979. –S. 131.
14. Stolbovoi A.P. Administrativno-predupreditel'nye mery militsii kak sredstvo bor'by s pravonarusheniyami v usloviyakh razvitogo sotsializma: Avtoref. diss…kand. yurid. nauk. – Kiev, 1984. – S. 7.
15. Kudryavtsev V.N. Prichiny pravonarushenii. – M., 1976.
16. Bilyalov A.K. Ob opredelenii kategorii «osnova» i «osnovanie» // Filosofskie nauki. – 1976. – ¹ 5. – S. 142.
17. Kerimov D.A. Metodologiya prava (predmet, funktsii, problemy filosofii prava) / 2-e izd.-M.: Avanta+, 2001. – S. 91.
18. Filimonov V.D. Kriminologicheskie osnovy ugolovnogo prava. – Tomsk: Tomskii universitet. 1981. – S. 22.
19. Gertsenzon A.A. Vvedenie v sovetskuyu kriminologiyu. – M., 1965. – S. 136.
20. Karpets I.I. Problemy prestupnosti. – M., 1969. – S. 69.
21. Kudryavtsev V.N. Prichinnost' v kriminologii. – M., 1968. – S. 10.
22. Sakharov A.B. O lichnosti prestupnika i prichinakh prestupnosti v SSSR. – M., 1961. – S. 58.
23. Antonyan Yu.M. Sotsial'naya sreda i formirovanie lichnosti prestupnika. – M., 1975. – S. 5.
24. Kudryavtsev V.N. Kontseptual'nye osnovy profilaktiki pravonarushenii // Materialy Vserossiiskoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii po probleme profilaktiki pravonarushenii. – M., 1997. – S. 10.
25. Filosofskaya entsiklopediya. – M., 1960. T. 1. – S. 206.
26. Kobzar' I.A. Sotsial'naya i kriminologicheskaya obuslovlennost' ugolovnoi otvetstvennosti nesovershennoletnikh (teoriya i praktika). – M., 1998. – S. 36.
27. Filosofskii entsiklopedicheskii slovar'. – M., 1983. – S. 707.
28. Kudryavtsev V.N. Prichiny pravonarushenii. – M., 1976. –S. 18.
29. Avanesov G.A. Teoriya i metodologiya kriminologicheskogo prognozirovaniya. –M., 1972. – S. 218.
30. Kuznetsova N.F. Kriminologiya kak nauka // Sovetskaya yustitsiya. 1970, ¹ 2. S. 8.
31. Goryainov K.K. Kriminologicheskaya obstanovka (metodologicheskie aspekty). – M.: VNII MVD SSSR. 1991. – S. 21.
32. Goryainov K.K. Kriminologicheskaya obstanovka (metodologicheskie aspekty). – M.: VNII MVD SSSR. 1991. – S. 24.
33. Kudryavtsev V.N. Prichiny pravonarushenii. – M., 1976. – S. 126.
34. Romanov G.A. Informatsionnoe obespechenie upravleniya profilakticheskoi deyatel'nost'yu organov vnutrennikh del // Profilaktika pravonarushenii. – M., 1980. Vyp. 11. – S. 15.
35. Kostennikov M.V., Kurakin A.V. K voprosu ob osnovanii administrativnoi otvetstvennosti v rossiiskom prave // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya.-2013.-10.-C. 75-88. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.10.10153. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_10153.html
36. Kurakin A.V. Kompetentsiya politsii v sfere realizatsii zakonodatel'stva ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya.-2013.-4.-C. 28-48. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.4.8841. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_8841.html
Link to this article
You can simply select and copy link from below text field.
|
|
