Статья 'Актуальные проблемы проведения антикоррупционной экспертизы нормативных правовых актов органами Прокуратуры РФ' - журнал 'Административное и муниципальное право' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Administrative and municipal law
Reference:

Актуальные проблемы проведения антикоррупционной экспертизы нормативных правовых актов органами Прокуратуры РФ

Bakhtina Mariya Sergeevna

PhD in Law

Lecturer at Urals State Law University, Department of Administrative Law

620137, Russia, g. Ekaterinburg, ul. Komsomol'skaya, 21

msbakhtina@gmail.com
Other publications by this author
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0595.2015.2.13872

Received:

01-12-2014


Published:

08-03-2015


Abstract: The article is devoted to the disputable questions of the existing legal normative acts expertize by the public prosecution bodies of the Russian Federation. The research subject is a review expertise in the sphere of combating corruption. The author considers the peculiarities of corruptibility expertises carried out by the public prosecution bodies, and their difference from the expertises carried out by other bodies. The research contains the discussion about the role of the Investigating Committee of the Russian Federation in anti-corruption expertize. Special attention is paid to the assize, dealing with the Public Prosecutor’ office’s demands. The methodology of the research is based on the dialectical materialism and the universal general scientific methods of cognition: comparison, analysis, synthesis, and others. The author concludes that review expertise, held by the public prosecution bodies, is one of the most effective types of expertise due to the absence of its dependence on the authors of legal acts, on the one hand, and the regularity of anti-corruption expertize and, consequently, a wide experience in this sphere, on the other hand. In the conclusion the author proves the necessity of amending of part 1 art 251 of Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation “Filing Applications for Disputing Legal Normative Acts”


Keywords:

anti-corruption expertise, public prosecution bodies, peculiarities, independence, corruption, review expertise, legal normative acts, combating corruption, the Investigating Committee of the Russian Federat, the Public Prosecutor's Office of the Russian Fede

References
1. FZ "Ob antikorruptsionnoi ekspertize normativnykh pravovykh aktov i proektov normativnykh pravovykh aktov" ot 17 iyulya 2009 g. N 172-FZ. SZ RF. 2009. N 29 st. 3609.
2. Budatarov S.M. Ob''ekt i predmet antikorruptsionnoi ekspertizy pravovykh aktov i ikh proektov // Voprosy sudebnoi reformy: pravo, ekonomika, upravlenie. 2009. N 3. S.36.
3. Nesterov A.V. Pravovye osnovaniya antikorruptsionnoi ekspertizy.
4. Kudashkin A.V. Antikorruptsionnaya ekspertiza: teoriya i praktika: nauchno-prakticheskoe posobie / A.V. Kudashkin. – M. : Norma : INFRA-M, 2012. S. 49.
5. Grebenyuk M.V. Realizatsiya zakonodatel'stva o nezavisimoi antikorruptsionnoi ekspertize i opyt raboty Internet-portala «Nezavisimaya antikorruptsionnaya ekspertiza» // Pervaya Vserossiiskaya nauchno-prakticheskaya konferentsiya «Realizatsiya zakonodatel'stva o nezavisimoi antikorruptsionnoi ekspertize: problemy i perspektivy». Sbornik materialov. – M. 2012. S. 49
6. Goncharov, D. Yu. Vozmozhnosti antikorruptsionnoi ekspertizy v rassledovanii korruptsionnykh prestuplenii / D. Yu. Goncharov. // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii .-2011.-№ 6. – S. 223.
7. Kudashkin, A. V., Dmitriev, D. A. K voprosu o neobkhodimosti sovershenstvovaniya pravovogo regulirovaniya provedeniya organami prokuratury antikorruptsionnoi ekspertizy v tselyakh povysheniya ee effektivnosti /A. V. Kudashkin, D. A. Dmitriev. //Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo.-2011.-№ 4.-S. 89.
8. Gulyagin A.Yu. Problemnye voprosy i praktika osushchestvleniya antikorruptsionnoi ekspertizy normativnykh pravovykh aktov i ikh proektov organami mestnogo samoupravleniya // Gosudarstvennaya vlast' i mestnoe samoupravlenie. – 2012.-№10.
9. Rasporyazhenie General'nogo prokurora Rossiiskoi Federatsii № 6/20r ot 14.01.2010 "Ob organizatsii ispolneniya resheniya zasedaniya prezidiuma Soveta pri Prezidente Rossiiskoi Federatsii po protivodeistviyu korruptsii ot 21 dekabrya 2009 goda". Tekst ofitsial'no opublikovan ne byl // SPS «Garant».
10. Bagmet A. M.,Merkulova L.E. K voprosu ob antikorruptsionnoi ekspertize normativnykh pravovykh aktov // Pravovye problemy protivodeistviya korruptsii: materialy Mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii Pravovye problemy protivodeistviya korruptsii». Moskva, 2 noyabrya 2011 g. / otv. red. L.V. Andrichenko, O.O. Zhuravleva. – M.: Institut zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya pri Pravitel'stve Rossiiskoi Federatsii; ID «Yurisprudentsiya», 2012. – S.194.
11. Prikaz SK Rossii ot 03.07.2012 № 38 (red. ot 09.09.2013) "Ob utverzhdenii poryadka provedeniya antikorruptsionnoi ekspertizy normativnykh pravovykh aktov (proektov normativnykh pravovykh aktov) Sledstvennogo komiteta Rossiiskoi Federatsii" // RG № 192, 22.08.2012.
12. Dmitriev D.A., Kudashkin A.V. Antikorruptsionnaya ekspertiza, provodimaya organami prokuratury. Voprosy sovershenstvovaniya pravovogo regulirovaniya // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. - 2013. - 3. - C. 158 - 177. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.3.710. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_710.html
13. Kabanov P.A. Nekotorye formy vzaimodeistviya
institutov grazhdanskogo obshchestva
s organami mestnogo samoupravleniya
v oblasti protivodeistviya korruptsii // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2012. - 5. - C. 5 - 8.

14. Kudashkin A.V., Dmitriev D.A. K voprosu o neobkhodimosti sovershenstvovaniya pravovogo regulirovaniya provedeniya organami prokuratury antikorruptsionnoi ekspertizy v tselyakh povysheniya ee effektivnosti // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2011. - 4. - C. 87 - 91.
15. Kabanov P.A. Retsenziya na knigu: Budatarov S.M.
Antikorruptsionnaya ekspertiza pravovykh aktov
i ikh proektov: ponyatie, poryadok provedeniya:
spetsializirovannyi uchebnyi kurs /
S.M. Budatarov; Saratovskii Tsentr
po issledovaniyu problem organizovannoi
prestupnosti i korruptsii. —
Saratov: Izd-vo FGBOU VPO «Saratovskaya
gosudarstvennaya yuridicheskaya akademiya»,
2013. — 120 s. // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2013. - 7. - C. 775 - 779. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.7.9054.

16. Bartsits I.N. Pravovye mekhanizmy sovershenstvovaniya
ekspertno-analiticheskogo obespecheniya
protivodeistviya korruptsii // Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya. - 2012. - 4. - C. 27 - 34.

Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.