|
MAIN PAGE
> Back to contents
Politics and Society
Reference:
Shipovalova L.V.
Practices of the search for consensus: between terror and contention
// Politics and Society.
2015. № 11.
P. 1495-1503.
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0684.2015.11.16548 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=16548
Практики поиска согласия: между террором и распрей.
Shipovalova Lada Vladimirovna
Doctor of Philosophy
Professor, the department of Philosophy of Science and Technology, Saint Petersburg State University
197110, Russia, g. Sagkt-Peterburg, ul. Bol'shaya Zelenina, 26, kv. 22
|
ladaship@gmail.com
|
|
 |
Other publications by this author
|
|
|
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0684.2015.11.16548
Received:
03-10-2015
Published:
06-01-2016
Abstract:
The subject of this research is the conditions for the practices of the search for public consensus. The practices themselves are defined by the Aristotle’s concept of golden mean, which proposes moving away from extremes. As extreme types of public consensus we introduce terror or totalitarian society (where appearance of a consensus is achieved by elimination of those who disagree) on one hand, and “contention” as the state of socio-political and cultural practices (for which it is characteristic to have heterogeneity of participants) on the other. The conditions defined in the article carry an empirical, transcendental, existential and epistemological character. The methodological course substantiates these clear practices of the search for consensus. This substantiation includes description of the extremes, demonstration of the need to avoid them, as well as definition of the conditions of this avoidance. The author’s idea of defining the practices of search for consensus, not through the positive movement towards some form of a clear consensus, but as a negative movement from extremes, can contribute to avoidance of problems of relativism of the multiculturalism, as well as the dictation of universalism.
Keywords:
Public consensus, terror, differend, power of judgment, philosophy of management, I. Kant, H. Arend, J.F. Lyotard, J. Rancière, B. Latour.
References
1. Aristotel'. Politika // Aristotel'; [per. s dr.grech.]. – Soch.: v 4-kh tomakh. M., Izdatel'stvo «Mysl'», 1983. T.4. S. 375-644.
2. Luman N. Neveroyatnost' kommunikatsii / Luman N; [per. s nem.] // Problemy teoreticheskoi sotsiologii. Vyp 3. SPb.: Izdatel'stvo SPbGU, 2000. // Elektronnaya publikatsiya: Tsentr gumanitarnykh tekhnologii. URL: http://gtmarket.ru/laboratory/expertize/2972
3. Aristotel'. Nikomakhova etika // Aristotel'; [per. s dr. grech.]. – Soch.: v 4-kh tomakh. M., Izdatel'stvo «Mysl'», 1983. T.4. S. 53-294.
4. Rozin V.M. Filosofiya upravleniya kak refleksiya nad obshchestvennymi protsessami i prakticheskaya distsiplina // Politika i Obshchestvo. 2012. № 8. S. 53-63.
5. Liotar Zh.F. Sostoyanie postmoderna / Zh.F. Liotar; [per. s fr.]. − M.: Institut eksperimental'noi sotsiologii; SPb.: Aleteiya, 1998. 160 s.
6. Lyotard J.-F. Differend: Phrases in Dispute / J.-F. Lyotard; [trans. from fr.]. – Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1988. 210 p.
7. Deot Zh.-L. O razlichii mezhdu raznoglasiem i rasprei (Rans'er-Liotar) / Zh.-L. Deot; [per. s fr.] // KhORA. 2008. № 4. S. 16-29.
8. Whaling in the Faroe Islands // Elektronnyi resurs URL: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whaling_in_the_Faroe_Islands
9. Agamben Dzh. Homo sacer. Chto ostaetsya posle Osventsima: arkhiv i svidetel' / Dzh. Agamben; [per. s ital.]. – M.: Izdatel'stvo «Evropa», 2012. 192 s.
10. Rans'er Zh. Nesoglasie: Politika i filosofiya / Zh. Rans'er; [per. s fr.]. — SPb.: Machina, 2013. 192 s.
11. Mamardashvili M.K., Solov'ev E.Yu., Shvyrev V.S. Klassicheskaya i sovremennaya burzhuaznaya filosofiya // Mamardashvili, M.K. Klassicheskii i neklassicheskii idealy ratsional'nosti. M.: Logos, 2004 S. 103-146.
12. Galison P. Zona obmena: koordinatsiya ubezhdenii i deistvii / P. Galison; [per. s angl.] // Voprosy istorii estestvoznaniya i tekhniki. 2004. № 1. C. 64-91.
13. The Atlas and Survey of Pidgin and Creole Languages / ed. S. M. Michaelis, P. Maurer, M. Haspelmath, M. Huber. – Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013. 4 vol.
14. Kant I. Kritika sposobnosti suzhdeniya / I. Kant; [per. s nem.]. — M.: Iskusstvo, 1994. 376 s.
15. Benkhabib S. Prityazaniya kul'tury. Ravenstvo i raznoobrazie v global'nuyu eru / S. Benkhabib; [per. s angl.]. – M.: Logos, 2003. 350 s.
16. Latur B. Peresborka sotsial'nogo. Vvedenie v aktorno-setevuyu teoriyu. / B. Latur; [per. s angl.]. – M.: Izdatel'skii dom Vysshaya shkola ekonomiki, 2014. 374 s.
17. Arend Kh. Chto est' svoboda? / Arend Kh. [per. s angl.] // Voprosy filosofii. 2014. № 4. S. 53-70
18. Danel'yan A.A. Rol' mezhdunarodnykh organizatsii v regulirovaniimezhdunarodnykh ekonomicheskikh otnoshenii:opyt, sovremennye problemy i tendentsii // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. - 2012. - 3. - C. 116 - 123.
19. Shaklein V.V. Teoreticheskie aspekty sootnosheniya chlenstva v OON
s priznaniem novykh gosudarstv // Pravo i politika. - 2013. - 10. - C. 1332 - 1337. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.10.9735.
20. Sazonova K.L. Politika «gosudarstvennogo terrorizma»: vyzov deistvuyushchei sisteme universal'noi kollektivnoi bezopasnosti i vozmozhnoe osnovanie mezhdunarodnoi otvetstvennosti gosudarstv. // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. - 2015. - 1. - C. 67 - 72. DOI: 10.7256/2073-8560.2015.1.14147.
21. // . - . - . - C. - . URL:
22. // . - . - . - C. - . URL:
23. // . - . - . - C. - . URL:
24. // . - . - . - C. - . URL:
25. // . - . - . - C. - . URL:
Link to this article
You can simply select and copy link from below text field.
|
|
