по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > List of peer reviewers > Review procedure > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Legal information > Editorial board
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
History of the border conflict between India and Pakistan.
Rep'eva A M

lecturer, specialist of the Department of Russian Politics of the Moscow State University named after M.V. Lomonosov

000000, Russia, g. Moscow, ul. Prospekt, 27

anastasia_re89@yahoo.com
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

Abstract.

The article poses an issue of the need to point out the unique character of each specific conflict. They take place with regard to the specificities, and the means of their regulation may be contradictory. The means of conflict regulation may be divided into two similar classifications, and the elements are somewhat connected with each other. Analysis of the borderline conflits has shown that the main cause of non-regulated border zones is the haste of Britain to leave its colonies in 1947. That is why, the object of studies in this article involves regional specificities of borderline conflict regulation in India and Pakistan.  The studies of regional specificities of regulation of borderline conflicts falls outside the scope of purely political studies, rather it is a topical area at the verge of several social sciences: political science, history, economics, jurisprudence, etc. The complex character of study required that in addition to general scientific methods (analysis, generalization, induction and deduction, analogy, classification and systematization method, comparative studies) the specialized methods were involved (procedural dynamic, structural functional, permissive). The key methods were comparative historical analysis and systemic approach. In both cases the parties look for cooperation, but in the case of conflict between India and Pakistan the interests of the parties in the region are different, and rapid resolution of the conflict seems impossible.  The Indian-Pakistanian conflict may be regarded as an international conflict due to the involvement of the third parties in its resolution. It may also be said that at the start of the new century the parties actively and fruitfully moved towards conflict resolution, but the terrorist acts and lack of trust of the states to each other stood in the way of its final resolution.

Keywords: conflict, territories, geopolitics, religion, colonies, armed conflict, India, Pakistan, political elites, region

DOI:

10.7256/2306-4226.2015.1.12618

Article was received:

12-07-2014


Review date:

13-07-2014


Publish date:

18-07-2014


This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Belokrenitskii V. Pakistan-Indiya: konfrontatsionnaya stabil'nost'? // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. 2006. T.4 №2(11).
2.
Voskresenskii A.D. Konflikty na Vostoke. Etnicheskie i kon-fessional'nye. M., 2008.
3.
L'yuis G. Bez oglyadki na bogov. Vzlet sovremennoi Indii. M., 2010.
4.
Lunev S.I., Shirokov G.K. Transformatsiya mirovoi sistemy i krupneishie strany Evrazii. M., 2001. S. 262.
5.
Manoilo A.V. Rol' tsvetnykh revolyutsii v demontazhe sovremennykh politicheskikh rezhimov // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. – 2014. – № 3. DOI: 10.7256/2073-8560.2014.3.12058
6.
Manoilo A.V. O protivodeistvii tsvetnym revolyutsiyam // Mezh-dunarodnye otnosheniya. – 2014. – № 3. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2014.3.12060
7.
Manoilo A.V. Aktual'nye aspekty formirovaniya novogo miroporyadka na platforme rossiiskoi modeli noosfernoi politiki i ideologii noovitizma // Politika i Obshchestvo. – 2014. – № 4. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2014.4.11910
8.
Manoilo A.V. Rol' strategii upravlyaemogo khaosa v formirovanii novogo miroporyadka // Pravo i politika. – 2014. – № 5. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2014.5.11816
9.
Manoilo A.V. Geopoliticheskaya kartina sovremennogo mira // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. – 2013. – № 5. DOI: 10.7256/2073-8560.2013.5.9394
10.
Manoilo A.V. Tekhnologiya realizatsii programmy sotsial'noi adaptatsii voennosluzhashchikh // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. – 2013. – № 4. DOI: 10.7256/2073-8560.2013.4.2401
11.
Manoilo A. V. Paradigmy upravleniya mezhdunarodnym konfliktami: konkurentsiya ili konfrontatsiya // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. – 2011. – № 5.
12.
Mekulov S.V. Istoriya indo-pakistanskogo vooruzhennogo konflikta. M., 2001.
13.
Morozova M. Pakistan. Tragediya prodolzhaetsya // Aziya i Afrika segodnya.2001. №6.
14.
Moskalenko V. N. Pakistan i Indiya: dve strany, odin konflikt // Aziya i Afrika segodnya. 2001. № 1
15.
Pleshov O.V. Pakistan: islamskii fundamentalizm i voennyi rezhim // Musul'manskie strany u granits SNG. M., 2001.
16.
Semchenkov A.S. Preduprezhdenie i neitralizatsiya vneshnikh ugroz politicheskoi stabil'nosti Rossii. //Vestnik Rossiiskoi natsii. 2011. T. 15. № 4-5.
17.
Filippov V.R. Natsional'no-kul'turnaya avtonomiya: klassicheskaya kontseptsiya i ee sovremennaya interpritatsiya// Natsional'no-kul'turnaya avtonomiya: problemy i suzhdeniya. Ser. «Etnodialogi», Moskva, 1998.
18.
Shaumyan T.L. Kto i pochemu voyuet v Kashmire? Indopakistanskoe vooruzhennoe protivostoyanie v Kargile: prichiny i posledstviya. M., 1999.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website