Ñòàòüÿ 'Ìîðôîëîãèÿ âûñòàâî÷íûõ ïðîñòðàíñòâ äëÿ ïðîåêòèðîâàíèÿ Ìóçåÿ âîäû' - æóðíàë 'Óðáàíèñòèêà' - NotaBene.ru
ïî
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Urban Studies
Reference:

Morphology of Exhibition Spaces for Designing a Water Museum

Kolodin Konstantin

ORCID: 0000-0001-7197-9824

PhD in Architecture

Associate Professor, Department of Architectural Environment and Landscape Design, St. Petersburg University of Architecture and Civil Engineering

190005, Russia, Saint Petersburg, Saint Petersburg, 2nd Krasnoarmeyskaya str., 4

kolodinstudio@bk.ru
Skurlatova Ekaterina

Postgraduate, Department of Architectural Design, St. Petersburg State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering (SPbGASU)

190005, Russia, Saint Petersburg, Saint Petersburg, 2nd Krasnoarmeyskaya str., 4

skurlatova.katarina@mail.ru
Cherepanov Petr

Postgraduate, Department of Architectural Design, St. Petersburg State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering (SPbGASU)

190005, Russia, Saint Petersburg, Saint Petersburg, 2nd Krasnoarmeyskaya str., 4

chepert98@gmail.com

DOI:

10.7256/2310-8673.2024.1.38485

EDN:

VIKTJS

Received:

20-07-2022


Published:

02-04-2024


Abstract: The main objective of this article is to identify the architectural image of a new type of museum and exhibition complex associated with the use of water as one of the design components. The subject of the study is to identify the morphology of exhibition spaces in the architecture of the object "Museum of Water". The article contains a brief overview of already implemented objects related to water, as well as a description of its own project proposal for the introduction of water and its aggregate states into a three-dimensional architectural structure. The material for analysis is the research results of the author's group as part of the design studio under the guidance of Associate Professor of the Department of Architectural Design of the St. Petersburg State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering (SPbGASU) Kolodin Konstantin Ivanovich and Bachelor Skurlatova Ekaterina Anatolyevna in the framework of the final qualifying work. As a basis for the developed research methodology, an overview analysis of architectural, urban planning and compositional principles of designing multifunctional complexes of complex structure was chosen, and a list of promising design and construction tasks was compiled. The relevance of this study is to consider the scientific novelty in creating a fundamentally new approach to the design of a multifunctional complex based on the morphology of water conditions. Based on the results of the main sections of the study, conclusions were formulated concerning the potential of water use in spatial and planning structures, as well as recommendations for the design of multifunctional complexes of a new type.


Keywords:

water museum, visualization of water, history of water, aggregate states of water, museum and exhibition spaces, the museum, multifunctional complex, morphology of exhibition spaces, morphotype, the river of time

This article is automatically translated. You can find original text of the article here.

Relevance of the study

There is no doubt that the design and construction of new museum complexes is a powerful factor in maintaining interest in St. Petersburg from both tourists and residents of the city, which will further lead to the development of the entire infrastructure surrounding the exhibition multifunctional complexes [1]. The relevance of designing these facilities should be based on the context of the territory, the environmental approach and the transport structure. However, the traditional obstacle to the creation of new museum complexes is the priority of the construction of commercial buildings and residential buildings. This obstacle can be overcome due to the uniqueness and innovation of the museum and exhibition complex, which in the future is likely to become one of the brands of the city [2]. A "Water Museum" can be proposed as a unique and innovative object, conceptualizing the image of St. Petersburg as a sea and river city.

With this approach, special attention should be paid to water itself as a physical and chemical substance, which becomes one of the interior and exterior components of the museum and exhibition space. The use of water and its aggregate states in the creation of an architectural project will ensure environmental versatility and structure the work of the entire complex in terms of its tourist attractiveness.

Research methodology: Based on a brief analytical review of existing museums of this type, consider water as a physical and chemical substance, whose properties should become one of the components of an architectural project.

The scientific novelty of the presented research lies in the compilation of a unique typological scheme for the creation of a fundamentally new approach to the design of a multifunctional complex based on the morphology of water conditions. Based on the results of the main sections of the study, conclusions were formulated regarding the potential of water use in spatial structures, as well as recommendations for the design of multifunctional complexes of a new type.

The purpose of the study: To analyze the possibilities of using water in architecture, as well as in creating unique exhibition spaces, and based on the analysis of the selected research object (the "Water Museum" in the structure of the Lenexpo quarter in St. Petersburg) to indicate the potential attractiveness of this complex for the further development of tourist infrastructure.

Within the framework of this study, the most relevant formation of the object and its location in the structure of St. Petersburg will be determined. The typological components of the project will also be revealed. Finally, recommendations on spatial and planning solutions will be offered, taking into account the use of water texture.

The object of the study is the qualification project "The Museum of Water in the structure of the Lenexpo quarter" (St. Petersburg). The study was based on a detailed structural analysis of this project from the point of view of the morphology of exhibition spaces and the influence of the water component on the architecture of the multifunctional complex.

The subject of the study is the architectural and planning solutions of three exhibition spaces based on aquatic morphotypes of the Museum of Water complex in the Lenexpo quarter in St. Petersburg.

Examples of water museums

At all stages of the development of architectural objects involving the use of water, the attitude towards this substance was exclusively domestic and utilitarian in nature. Over time, the mythological component of the relationship to water has acquired both cultural and ideological value, growing with new meanings, myths and legends. Water has gradually transformed from an everyday natural resource into an important architectural component [3]. New typologies of museum objects related to the direct use of water as a component of the exhibition content began to appear in modern architecture [4].

For example, a project with an atypical structure of the outdoor space formation attracted great public attention not so long ago. It was a new water feature (Fig.1) developed by WET, a company based in Los Angeles, California. The company is engaged in the integration of innovative ideas into architecture, as well as the design of production complexes and engineering systems. The project was named "Water Feature" and was implemented at the Dubai World EXPO 2020. A little earlier in 2009, the same company created another project in Dubai – the Dubai Fountain [5].

Fig. 1. Waterfall "Water Feature" at the Dubai World EXPO 2020.

 The company managed to create an attractive and technologically unique architectural object based on a different typology of environment formation. The novelty of the typology lies in a non-standard way of attracting visitors through the use of new techniques developed by WET to demonstrate the overall progress and sustainable development of architecture as the main concept of the world exhibition EXPO 2020.

This example clearly proves that the project's investors understood the importance of creating an object of this kind as one of the brands of the EXPO 2020 exhibition. His concept is based on the influence of water on architecture as one of its components. An innovative approach and unique technologies have made it possible to create a successful and memorable object, which has become one of the centers of attraction for visitors at the Dubai International Exhibition.

Another example of non-standard familiarization with water in the museum space are underwater museums: Atlantico Lanzarote in the Canary Islands and the Mexican underwater museum Musa in the Caribbean [6]. The main exhibition of the latter is located underwater and is a gallery of large-scale human figures. Sculptures under water have their own composition, they carry a certain thought and idea. The artists and organizers of the exhibition, which attracts tourists from all over the world, managed to create a unique object of its kind, successfully combining the visualization of humanitarian images with the physical texture of water.

An example of a similar facility in Russia is a demonstration aquarium with fresh Baikal water in the building of the Baikal Museum in the village of Listvyanka (built in 2004 on the shore of Lake Baikal). The concept of the museum space is based on the idea of temporary involvement of visitors in the Baikal ecosystem. The successful project was the main factor in the growth of tourist flow to the region, as well as the commercial development of the surrounding area. In addition, the Baikal Museum aroused the increased interest of the population and specialists in the topical environmental problems of the region.

 

An example of a museum space using the image of water in St. Petersburg is the Universe of Water Museum [7]. The curators of the exhibition are trying to incorporate the imagery of this object into a recognizable brand in the implementation of marketing and economic projects carried out by the museum. However, the architecture of this building is far from an urban symbol that works as a popular logo (Fig.2).

Fig. 2. The Universe of Water Museum in St. Petersburg.

Review and research of the three-dimensional model of the "Museum of Water"

The subject of the article is a comparative analysis of the above examples with its own developed project "The Museum of Water in the structure of the Lenexpo quarter".

The project was developed for the territory of the quarter in the southern part of Vasilyevsky Island of St. Petersburg. The plot of 13.65 hectares has a long embankment along the Galley Bucket – part of the water area of the Gulf of Finland. Significant marine-related objects are located on the territory of the quarter - the Marine Station, the museum of the Submarine D2-Narodovolets, the monument to the sailors of torpedo boats (Fig.3). Thus, the already existing marine water infrastructure makes the choice of this quarter as the location of the object expedient and relevant [8].

Fig. 3. The project of the Water Museum. The master plan of the projected site. The territory of Lenexpo (author Skurlatova E.A. under the guidance of Kolodin K.I.).

The design of the museum quarter is carried out along compositional axes, in the direction from the embankment to Cash Street. This shift creates an original structure of residential groups – an important component of the territory. The front of the houses with corner sections gives the composition a clear rhythm. For contrast, houses with curved shapes are presented along the embankment. Public spaces and zones (school zone and DDU) also correspond to a given style. The orthogonal grid of functional zones with a contrasting combination of objects is completed by a multifunctional complex of complex structure and shape in the southern part of the quarter near the water area on the square of Maritime Glory.

The Water Museum creates its own chamber structure inside the quarter. There is a connection with the embankment, the environment has been developed [9]. Transport accessibility and transit to Cash Street are provided, as well as parking areas for staff and visitors. The museum object provides a compositional connection with the Seaport. The facilities of the complex are located expediently from the point of view of creating a functional environment [9].

The formation in the environmental spot of the museum complex is symbolic. The main and accompanying buildings, with their geometric outlines, lead to the symbol of the water formula – "H2O". The main object, the building of the Water Museum, resembles the letter "O" in its elliptical shape, while the buildings of the scientific center for the study of water are associated with the Roman numeral "II". And finally, the environment surrounding the main entrance group to the museum is designed like the letter "H" (Fig. 4). Thus, the combined symbolism of the project gives a clear understanding of the main idea of the entire museum complex.

Fig. 4. The project of the Water Museum. The plan of the 1st floor for room +0.000 (author Skurlatova E.A. under the guidance of Kolodin K.I.).

The concept of this project is based on the idea of creating a unique spectacular object with a complex structure, namely: the idea of a multifunctional complex with a museum function as the predominant one. In addition to the museum area, the complex provides research and shopping and entertainment functional subgroups.  

The internal exposition of the museum part of the multifunctional complex widely demonstrates water, interpreting its texture from the point of view of history, culture and ecology. The exterior of the building of the multifunctional complex is executed in the style of modern symbolism [10].

The facade of the courtyard of the object is made in the form of a single waterfall (Fig. 5). Such a facade can offer visitors various shows within the framework of the museum program (Fig.6). Rainwater is collected, purified and reused using special equipment. Additional water tanks and drive mechanisms are located on the technical floor with a special typological design map.

Fig. 5. The project of the Water Museum. A fragment of a longitudinal section (author Skurlatova E.A. under the guidance of Kolodin K.I.).

Also, within the framework of the project, an environmental approach to the design of the complex and its surroundings was worked out [11]. The appearance of outdoor furniture, small architectural forms, sculptures and art objects are associated with water. The details of the main facade of the building are also symbolic.  As an example, you can point to stylized dripping drops, spears of ice, snow covers and steam clouds.

Fig. 6. The project of the Water Museum. The inner facade (by Skurlatova E.A. under the guidance of Kolodin K.I.).

The main solution is to create a conceptually new museum and exhibition space. The aggregate states (Fig. 7), fractions, chemical and physical properties of water can have a direct impact on the functional zoning of the museum complex.

Fig. 7. Schematic chemical representation of the aggregate states of water. Ice, liquid water, water vapor (from right to left).

During the design, the optimal method of vertical zoning at several levels of the museum space was identified:

· Level 1 – Liquid state - water. A new way of moving around the museum and viewing the exposition in a circle was applied. Visitors are provided with swimming boats on which they can cruise along an artificially created channel – the “River of Time". The exhibition space allows you to get acquainted with the objects of cultural and scientific work related to water. It is possible to consider the exposure in the water column, the reflection of water, in drops of various sizes and fractions. The architectural and planning solution of such an exposition was executed as an internal river channel with a connected system of fountains, waterfalls, artificial geysers and water surfaces. They are synchronized in time and type of presentation for museum visitors. The appearance and shape of the interior spaces of the museum is determined by the emotional and mental associations of a person associated with water. From the point of view of the technical implementation of the project, additional engineering solutions have been developed to ensure structural strength and duration of operation while simultaneously waterproofing all structural elements and communications in compliance with all norms of thermal and humidity characteristics (Fig. 8).

Fig. 8. The scheme of showing functional zones in the exposed space "River of Time" (author Skurlatova E.A. under the guidance of Kolodin K.I.).

· Level 2. The solid state is Ice. The conceptual principle of the part of the exhibition space dedicated to ice and snow called "Pipe". It is formed according to a similar typology. Visitors enter the snow-covered climate zone, where they are given the opportunity to explore the ice exhibits. The exposition allows the use of snow and ice for both scientific and entertainment purposes. Architectural and constructive solutions were suggested with artistic associations with the crystal structure, color scheme and texture of ice and snow (Fig. 9).

Fig. 9. The scheme of showing functional zones in the exposed space "Pipe" (author Skurlatova E.A. under the guidance of Kolodin K.I.).

· Level 3. Gaseous water is Steam. The physical and visual properties of steam made it possible to create a unique typology of the demonstration of the exposition in the exhibition space "Pipe". The methods and principles of visualization of architectural and structural solutions used in this zone resemble the methods and principles of visualization in the already mentioned zones of water and ice.  Transition to a tropical climate zone with a planned humidity volume of steam, viewing exhibits through a steam curtain using unique light installations and landmarks.

Below is Table No. 1 with a typological layout of the morphology of exhibition spaces, identified during the development process for optimal use and non-stop functioning of the museum zone of the multifunctional complex:

Table No. 1. Typological morphology of the exhibition spaces of the Museum of Water

The exposed object

Morphotype

Typological map of the premises

Function

Constructive solutions

Location

 

Liquid water

 

 

 

 

Facade-waterfall

 

  

 

 

 

The River of Time

 

 

The exposed space

 

 

 

Exhibition, educational,

entertainment

 

 

 

Increased waterproofing layer, maintaining the desired water level using an electronic sensor

 

Level 1;

The design mark is 0.000

 

 

Maintenance block of premises (storage of inventory, special equipment,)

 

 

The service

 

 

Level 1;

The design mark is 0.000

 

 

Technical floor (technical server unit for providing the necessary parameters and capacities)

 

 

The service

 

 

-1 level;

Design mark –

 -5.100

 

Solid water

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tube

 

An exposable space with an artificially created Arctic climate

 

 

 

Exhibition, educational,

entertainment

 

 

 

 

 

 

Increased insulation of enclosing structures, provision of special equipment in order to maintain proper temperature conditions

 

Level 2;

The design mark is +7.200

 

 

 

 

Room maintenance unit (special refrigeration units, wind generators)

 

 

The service

 

 

Level 2;

The design mark is +7.200

 

Vaporous water

 

 

 

 

 

Tube

 

An exposed space with artificially created steam volumes

 

 

Exhibition, educational,

entertainment

 

 

 

 

 

 

Increased waterproofing layer, maintenance of temperature and humidity conditions of climatic zones, ensuring the safety and convenience of visitors to the steam space

 

 

Level 2;

The design mark is +7.200

 

 

 

 

The maintenance unit of the premises

 

 

The service

 

Level 2;

The design mark is +7.200

 

 

In the process of developing the components of this project, two main volumetric morphotypes were proposed: a round open space for compositional formation of the courtyard and a looped pipe as a form of exposure of flowing water, ice and steam. Vertical differentiation made it possible to obtain two working levels.

The general functional division of the museum part of the complex into exhibition areas for various aggregate states of water was also decided taking into account the physical texture of the mentioned aggregate states.  Taking into account the weight, density, as well as the unequal ability of water to fill space in different states, both vertical and horizontal zoning of the complex was applied (Fig. 10). The technical support of all the typologies listed above is presented in the form of an additional general technical floor with a unique set of service rooms. Engineering solutions combine all methods to achieve visually demonstrative effects of exposure to aggregate water conditions using drainage systems, integrated pumping stations and refrigeration generators.

Fig. 10. The project of the Water Museum. A cut along the wall (author Skurlatova E.A. under the guidance of Kolodin K.I.).

Marketing, cultural and scientific activities are important aspects of popularizing water as the main component of a multifunctional complex: 1) development and further popularization of new environmental methods for the production and conservation of water; 2) charity events, seminars and actions to finance programs for the conservation and rational use of water; 3) sale of souvenirs related to water topics and other commercial activities [12]; 4) the possibility of renting the premises of the complex for temporary exhibitions and other events.

Appeals to opponents

A preliminary analysis of previously published studies and a review of the available literature on the topic under consideration suggests that this project has no direct analogues in the Russian Federation. Unfortunately, the Universe of Water Museum in St. Petersburg is not able to compete with modern technological solutions that have appeared in world architecture over the past decades. In addition to the fact that this museum is located in the building of a former 19th-century water tower and therefore cannot incorporate architectural morphotypes of water, the organization of the exposition itself follows outdated museum standards. This does not allow this museum to function as a center of tourist attraction. In addition, St. Petersburg currently does not have any exhibition space that would promote and develop the image of the city as a maritime and river center.

Also, during the development of this project, the article by Mukhitova R.K., Minnegulova Z.N. "The River Museum as a new form of preserving the ethnic historical and cultural heritage of peoples" was studied in detail, the research materials in which are very close to the topic we have stated. There is no doubt that the conclusions reached by the authors of this work are relevant for the museum and exhibition infrastructure of modern Russia. It is impossible not to agree that in our country at the moment there is a shortage of permanent exhibitions designed taking into account aquatic morphology. However, the authors of the analyzed article, in our opinion, lacked scale and innovation in solving the issues they raised, which is reflected in the lack of reinforcement of the author's theses with substantial project proposals.     

In addition, a review of available research on the synthesis of architecture and aggregate states of water made it possible to make sure that most authors primarily emphasize the symbolic and historical value of water as a component of architectural projects. For example, it can be expressed in the symbolism of the external form (a drop, a boat, a sail). Without abandoning this direction, which has already become traditional, the proposed project carries the potential for future development of the architectural direction based on the use of various aggregate states of water. Today, there is a clear demand for such an architecture all over the world, as evidenced by annual conferences, research and development. In addition to a carefully designed visualization, this project offers a concept that is accessible not only to researchers, which can claim to be a center of tourist attraction.

The conclusions of this study

According to the main sections of the study and the analytical review carried out, the following conclusions can be formulated:

1. The construction of a museum multifunctional complex in St. Petersburg with the involvement of existing international architectural developments will significantly increase the tourist flow. The unique and innovative facility will be able to transform into one of the recognizable brands of the city in the future.

2. This study confirms the expediency of such a location of the complex: in a large tourist center associated with a marine theme, as well as having direct access to the water.

3.   The study emphasizes the need to create a new methodology for the formation of architectural space based on human knowledge about water, the promotion of its conservation and use.

4. This study has revealed new functional architectural components based on three states of water – liquid, solid and gaseous. The aggregate states of water, their appearance and physical properties make it possible to differentiate the museum and exhibition space in a new way. The ability of water to act as a spectacular object as such, taking into account the textural features of its aggregate properties, was also proved and justified.

5. The conducted research demonstrated the prospects for further development and design of architectural spaces of this kind in Russia, taking into account the world's innovative developments.

References
1. Gavrilov, M. (2020). Features of designing tourist centers on the example of China, Engineering and Construction. Bulletin of the Caspian Region, 34(4), 7-12.
2. Gorgorova, Yu. (2022). Formation of the urban environment and city brand based on citizen. The Bulletin of BSTU named after V.G. Shukhov, 2, 76-83.
3. Avksenteva, T. (2015) The role of water in the urban space. News of the KSUAE, 34(4), 97-104.
4. Petrushikhina, S. (2018) The Architectural-artistic appearance of the museum in the early 21st century. Articult, 30(2), 144-148.
5. Timokhina, M. & Koshkin, D. (2018). Modern trends of water architecture in the subject-spatial environment of the city Abstract. News of the KSUAE, 46(4), 185-192.
6. Mukhitov, R. & Minnegulova, Z. (2020). "The River Museum" as a new form of preservation of the historical and cultural heritage of peoples. News of the KSUAE, 51(1), 18-26.
7. Chugunova, V. (2013). "Home" for a museum: to the question of museum architecture functions. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg state university of culture, 17(4), 126-128.
8. Poleshchuk, M. & Klimenko, I. (2022). Development of public spaces in the coastal zones of the largest cities of the Volga region. Architecture and Modern Information Technologies, 59(2), 225-244.
9. Savachevskaya, V. & Sysoeva, J. & Biryukova, E. & Basmanova, L. (2018). Water in the space of campus university. Organization of the contact environment. Innovation and Investment, 12, 247-251.
10. Baikova, E. (2018). Equimorpfism and related images in architectural form-making. Tomsk State University Journal of Cultural Studies and Art History, 29(1), 32-42.
11. Gavrilova, M. & Gavrilov, A.(2020). Methods of using water structures in the formation of public urban spaces, Engineering and Construction. Bulletin of the Caspian Region, 31(1), 69-73.
12. Suleymanova, K. (2020). Exhibition industry abroad in 2020 - analysis and development prospects. Moscow Economic Journal, 6, 53-60.

First Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

If you read the text from the first letter, your eyes stumble on the title (Morphology of aquatic exhibition spaces for museum design). First of all, the water spaces have no morphology (except geographical). But obviously, this is not about that, but about some forms given to water — however, these are guesses. But the provocative meaning of the title is not exhausted by this. There are water and exhibition (and museum) spaces. What exactly are aquatic exhibition spaces? Let's try to figure it out. And in this case, complications and problems await us from the first steps. The text opens the Relevance section. Here are his first phrases: "Formation of public museum and exhibition (?) spaces in large cities, such as St. Petersburg, are most significant for central areas (what does this mean?). Population growth, the consolidation of buildings in the center, the influx of tourists exacerbate the problem (which one?). As examples of the formation of objects for (?) public service (?) A water museum can serve. "A rather strange and very confusing introduction. And here are his following lines: "The research was carried out on the basis of an implemented architectural project by an author's group as part of a design studio led by Associate professor of the Department of Architectural Design of St. Petersburg State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering (SPbGASU) K. I. Kolodin and bachelor Skurlatova E. A. " This, of course, is very valuable information - but is it worth it, in- firstly, to start with them, and secondly, how does this relate to the relevance of the study? The answer is obvious — no way. Let's continue quoting further — the continuation is very characteristic and chaotic: "The modern museum business is gaining momentum in world practice. This leads to the appearance of architectural objects with new functions[1]. A special role among them is assigned to museums related to water and water bodies: seas, oceans, rivers, lakes. Among them there are underwater, mobile and floating museum complexes (up to this point the text seems a little too general, but generally acceptable). The above analysis is based on the study of the role of water in the context of general human use (by whom the study of the role of water in the context of general human use was carried out, it is unclear, and, in fact, unprincipled; it is essential that this is an unacceptable transition to another level of presentation associated with a change of subject). Environmental issues related to water were raised (why? And this is a completely independent direction that has nothing to do with the declared one). The task is to display water by architectural means in buildings and structures.". The educational level of the text becomes obvious, due to a weak understanding of the general tasks and goals of scientific research. Is the style, structure, and content worth analyzing further so carefully? It is entertaining in its own way — and belongs to a kind of genre of science fiction support for free (student) project search. Conclusions, the interest of the readership of such texts is certainly not without interest and worthy of publication — however, apparently, in specially designated sources; they feel a free flow of thoughts and an inspired search — alas, far enough from the established scientific canons. Here is a fragment of the conclusion in confirmation: "The main conclusions of this study, the analysis showed that the combination of all factors, historical analysis and actual examples in architecture, as well as examples of the creation of museums with a similar problem for the author of the article raised lead to the following conclusions (the phrase is actually meaningless and superfluous in this context): 1. The expediency of the location of the complex – in a large tourist center; a place related to the water / marine theme; in a quarter with direct access to the water. 2. Creation of a completely new methodology for the formation of architecture space; formation based on humanity's knowledge about water, promotion of its conservation and use (creation — what? Is it necessary? Is it desirable? The phrase is simply not finished). 3. The conceptual difference (what from what?) it consists in the new use of water by the method of visual and aesthetic representation (meaningless), the structural features of the building (?) and new principles of shaping (?)." etc. Conclusion: the work does not meet the requirements for scientific presentation, both stylistically and structurally-logically.

Second Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

The article "Morphology of exhibition spaces for the design of the Water Museum" presented for publication is an architectural and urban planning study on the degree of formation of the territories of St. Petersburg in the Lenexpo area, the design and construction of new museum complexes is a powerful factor in maintaining interest. According to the author, the design and construction of new museum complexes is a powerful factor in maintaining interest from both local residents and tourists. The purpose of the study: "... To analyze the possibilities of using water in architecture, as well as in creating unique exhibition spaces, and based on the analysis of the selected research object (the "Water Museum" in the structure of the Lenexpo quarter in St. Petersburg) to indicate the potential attractiveness of this complex for the further development of tourist infrastructure ...". The objectives of the study are set out very clearly, and consist of three points: "... the most relevant formation of the object and its location in the structure of St. Petersburg will be determined. The typological components of the project will also be identified. And finally, recommendations on spatial and planning solutions will be offered, taking into account the use of water texture." Research methodology: "Based on a brief analytical review of existing museums of this type, consider water as a physical and chemical substance, whose properties should become one of the components of an architectural project." The object of research: "... is the qualification project "The Museum of Water in the structure of the Lenexpo quarter" (St. Petersburg). The study was based on a detailed structural analysis of this project from the point of view of the morphology of exhibition spaces and the influence of the water component on the architecture of the multifunctional complex)." The relevance of the work comes from the context of the territory, the environmental approach and the transport structure. However, the author mentions that the traditional obstacle to the creation of new museum complexes is the priority of the construction of commercial buildings and residential buildings. There is no scientific novelty and the subject of the study, which is an important component for the specifics of the study. The style is generally scientific, corresponds to the normalization of speech, the facts and chronology of the study are accurately and fully explained, cause-and-effect relationships in concepts and definitions are shown. The structure of the text is literate, improving the perception and attractiveness for the reader. Content. The study begins with an "Introduction", represented by the above structural elements, the main part, represented by five sections (Examples of water museums; Review and study of the three-dimensional model "Water Museum") and the conclusion of the study (which is presented as the "Conclusions of this study"). There is no appeal to the opponents. The paper contains 10 figures and one table. Figure 10 was not loaded in the work. The study of the bibliography on this topic is presented by 12 sources of Russian authors only. Notes to the work: to add all the missing structural elements of the introduction reflecting the specifics of this study, in an appeal to opponents it is necessary to critically "discuss" the results obtained in the context of published secondary data and literature, the results of other researchers or previously obtained results of the author of the article himself. The article is intended for a wide range of readers interested in architecture, urban planning, restoration and architectural and artistic heritage of St. Petersburg. From the point of view of urban studies, the article will arouse the reader's interest among students of architectural and art history universities, various figures in the field of historiography, archival affairs, engineers, practitioners in the field of urban planning and cartography, architects.

Third Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

The author defines the subject of the study as "architectural and planning solutions of three exhibition spaces based on aquatic morphotypes of the complex "Museum of Water" in the Lenexpo quarter in St. Petersburg" in the qualification project "Museum of Water in the structure of the Lenexpo quarter". Considering that the object of the study, the qualification project "The Museum of Water in the structure of the Lenexpo quarter", is a large-scale project of a potential large infrastructure facility (according to the author, the implementation of the project "in the future will lead to the development of the entire infrastructure" of St. Petersburg, since the project under consideration "in the future is likely to become one of the brands of the city" what justifies the relevance of the study), the reader has a reasonable question: what is the socio-economic feasibility of the analyzed segment of the existing object (qualification project)? In other words, how can "architectural and planning solutions of three exhibition spaces based on aquatic morphotypes of the Museum of Water complex in the Lenexpo quarter in St. Petersburg" convince citizens of the Russian Federation, large domestic corporations (socially oriented business) or the state to provide resources for the implementation of the qualification project considered as an object? Meanwhile, the value of a qualification project is to demonstrate the level of qualification of the designer (or design team). In the Russian tradition, even industrial design more often refers not to engineering, but exclusively to the artistic field of creativity. This is demonstrated by the article proposed for consideration. The author avoids analyzing the engineering and design solutions of the project under consideration, which may require innovative technologies and create a basis for the technological leadership of the company implementing the project, as, for example, implemented in the "Water Feature" project. The author draws the reader's attention to the symbolic component of the architectural layout, trying to justify the aesthetic advantages of the project. He succeeded in this: the arguments presented explain the artistic idea of the authors of the project "The Museum of Water in the structure of the Lenexpo quarter". It can be argued that the subject of the study is sufficiently disclosed in the aspect chosen by the author, and from the point of view of artistic design, the presented work will be interesting to a number of researchers. However, the scientific novelty, as it is indicated in the work, remains in doubt. The research methodology, as presented by the author ("Based on a brief analytical review of existing museums of this type, consider water as a physical and chemical substance whose properties should become one of the components of an architectural project") is an intuitive (unconscious) oxymoron due to the metaphorical use by the author of the concepts of physical and chemical properties of water. The properties of water are understood as a source of artistic and design inspiration, far from the engineering tasks of embodying an artistic idea. The "analytical review" in the aspect chosen by the author (aesthetics of design solutions of individual architectural objects) is not a scientific method that solves the tasks of goal-setting ("analyze the possibilities of using water in architecture"). The objects proposed as an example are selected eclectically. The author uses a random sample, although in world practice there are examples of more grandiose architectural and technological solutions for museum and exhibition spaces that take into account the possibilities of water. Neither the method nor the relevance of the topic indicated by the author corresponds to the tasks set. The author justifies the relevance of the chosen topic by the need for a serious infrastructure project in order to attract tourists to St. Petersburg. Firstly, tourists to St. Petersburg have already been attracted and this resource is intensively exploited to maintain, preserve and develop the complex urban environment of Northern Palmyra, following the logic of the author, it is necessary to take away part of the resource involved to implement the project advertised by him. It follows that the topic proposed by the author is hardly relevant for modern St. Petersburg. Secondly, the author avoids the more urgent problem of the socio-economic feasibility of large infrastructure projects, which undermines the credibility of the project he analyzes. The strong point of the article is the provocation of a theoretical discussion around conceptual design solutions in the transformation of the urban environment, however, the author's concentration exclusively on one project reduces the scientific significance of the presented material. Scientific novelty, as it is indicated in the work, remains in doubt. The author writes: "Based on the results of the main sections of the study, conclusions were formulated regarding the potential of water use in spatial structures, as well as recommendations for the design of multifunctional complexes of a new type." However, of the above conclusions, only the fourth ("This study has revealed new functional architectural components based on three states of water – liquid, solid and gaseous. The aggregate states of water, their appearance and physical properties make it possible to differentiate the museum and exhibition space in a new way. The ability of water to act as a spectacular object as such has also been proved and justified, taking into account the textural features of its aggregate properties") follows from the approach proposed by the author. The rest (1, 2, 3, 5) are directly dependent on the expediency and profitability of complex design, engineering, design and even innovative technological solutions, which are not given enough attention in the work. The style as a whole is scientific, although there is no clear logical relationship between relevance, goal-setting, methodology and final conclusions: perhaps the artistic and metaphorical use of certain terms causes the difficulty of reading the author's thought in the presented text. The structure of the article is transparent and corresponds to the logic of presenting the results of scientific research, but the content of individual sections and their logical relationship are not obvious. The content of the test contains statements that are difficult to understand, in which the meaning is veiled to complete nonsense (for example, "In addition to carefully designed visualization, this project offers a concept accessible not only to researchers, which can claim to be a center of tourist attraction"). The bibliography is designed taking into account the requirements of the editorial board, although it does not contain a review of foreign literature on the topic. Appealing to opponents is generally correct, but extremely insufficient. The author focuses exclusively on the analyzed project, so the theoretical discourse remains aloof from the author's thought. The article may arouse the interest of the readership of the journal "Urbanistics", but it needs to be finalized. The author should focus on conceptual art and design solutions and demonstrate the certainly interesting findings of the project "The Museum of Water in the structure of the Lenexpo quarter" in the context of a broader field of discussion, revise the methodology (if it is based on comparison, then it is necessary to balance the analysis of various examples, without singling out one "favorite" from them), it is necessary to reduce the metaphorical understanding the properties of water (in fact, we are talking about the symbolism of water), having been clearly defined in terminology.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.