Архитектурное пространство города: семиотический подход

Петренко Анастасия Петровна; Берестовская Диана Сергеевна

doi:10.7256/2310-8673.2017.1.22489


	Journal Menu > Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Peer-review process > Peer-review in 24 hours: How do we do it? > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Publication in 72 hours: How do we do it? > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy


	Journals in science databases


	About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!

При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.

По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents

Urban Studies

Reference:

Berestovskaya D., Petrenko A. — Architectural space of a city: semiotic approach // Urban Studies. – 2017. – № 1. – P. 24 - 34. DOI: 10.7256/2310-8673.2017.1.22489 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=22489

Architectural space of a city: semiotic approach

Berestovskaya Diana

Doctor of Philosophy

Professor, the department of Culturology, Tavrida National V. I. Vernadsky University

295007, Russia, the Republic of Crimea, Simferopol, Prospekt Vernadskogo 4

verynya.58@gmail.com

Другие публикации этого автора

Petrenko Anastasiia

Post-graduate student, the department of Culturology, V. I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University

295007, Russia, respublika Krym, g. Simferopol', pr. Vernadskogo, 4

petrenko.ap@mail.ru

Другие публикации этого автора

DOI:

10.7256/2310-8673.2017.1.22489

Review date:

30-03-2017

Publish date:

11-04-2017

Abstract.

The object of this study is the semiotic character of architectural space that allows characterizing the city as a complex multi-level system with typical texts and codes, belonging to different language culture. The subject of this research is the architectural image of the city of Feodosiya with houses of worship and museums, historic monuments and fountains, public buildings and mansions of the urban elite – the architectural objects that are dominant in the urban space. The authors explore the city as symbolic integral institution, which is in constant search of its own relevant image. Special attention is given to the meaning of signs and symbols that manifest as the media in architectural space. The problem of creating an integrative holistic image of the city, understanding of structure and principles of formation of its architectural space is revealed through the semiotic method. The article is first to analyze the architecture of Feodosiya in the context of the uniqueness of the cultural landscape of Crimea, which carries a certain information framed into the semiotic system. Examination of the urban space of the Crimean cities becomes relevant in contemporary cultural studies, because the formation of semiotic cultural space was influenced by the lifestyle of multiple nations. The application of semiotic method of analysis is justified and requires further study.
Keywords: architectural appearance, cultural landscape, text, symbol, sign, semiotics, city, space, Feodosiya, Crimea
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References

1.	Antsiferov N. P. Puti izucheniya goroda kak sotsial'nogo organizma: opyt kompleksnogo podkhoda. Leningrad: Seyatel', 1926. 152 s.
2.	Bart R. Izbrannye raboty: Semiotika. Poetika: Per. s fr. / Sost., obshch. red. i vstup. st. G. K. Kosikova. M.: Progress, 1989. 616 s.
3.	Bel M., Braisen N. Semiotika i iskusstvoznanie // Voprosy iskusstvoznaniya. 1996. №9 (2/96). S. 521–559.
4.	Berestovskaya D. S. Kul'turnye landshafty Kryma: kollektivnaya monografiya. Simferopol': IT «ARIAL», 2016. 380 s.
5.	Dzhenks Ch. Yazyk arkhitektury postmodernizma: Per. s angl. M.: Stroiizdat, 1985. 136 s.
6.	Lendri Ch. Kreativnyi gorod: per. s angl. M., 2011. 399 s.
7.	Lotman Yu. M. Semiosfera. SPb.: Iskusstvo-SPB, 2000. 704 s.
8.	Lotman Yu. M. Simvolika Peterburga i problemy semiotiki goroda // Lotman Yu. M. Istoriya i tipologiya russkoi kul'tury. SPb., 2002. S. 208-221. (768 s.)
9.	Petrova E. B. Antichnaya Feodosiya. Istoriya i kul'tura. Simferopol': Sonat, 2000. 264 s.
10.	Pocheptsov G. G. Semiotika. M.: «Refl-buk», K.: «Vakler», 2002. 432 s.
11.	Toporov V. N. Peterburgskie teksty i Peterburgskie mify (Zametki iz serii) // Toporov V. N. Mif. Ritual. Simvol. Obraz: Issledovaniya v oblasti mifopoeticheskogo: Izbrannoe. M.: Progress-Kul'tura, 1995. S. 368-399. (624 s.)
12.	Chepaitene G. Kul'turnoe nasledie v global'nom mire. Vil'nyus: EGU, 2010. 298 s.
13.	Eko U. Otsutstvuyushchaya struktura. Vvedenie v semiologiyu: Per. s isp. A. G. Pogonyailo i V.G. Reznik. SPb.: TOO TK «Petropolis», 1998. 432 s.
14.	Yankovskaya Yu. S. Arkhitekturnaya kompozitsiya i semiotika – genezis idei // Arkhitekton: izvestiya vuzov. № 2 (7). 2004. URL http://http://archvuz.ru/2004_2/3

Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.