Статья 'Метакогнитивная модель совладающего поведения субъекта в период эпидемии Сovid-19' - журнал 'Психолог' - NotaBene.ru
по

 

 

Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Peer-review in 24 hours: How do we do it? > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Publication in 72 hours: How do we do it? > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Psychologist
Reference:

Metacognitive model of coping behavior of a subject during the COVID-19 pandemic

Chistiakova Natalia Viktorovna

PhD in Psychology

Educator, the department of Psychology, International University in Moscow

125040, Russia, Moskva oblast', g. Moscow, ul. Leningradskii Prospekt, 17

n.chistiakova@mmu.ru
Aisuvakova Tatiana Petrovna

PhD in Psychology

Docent, Head of the department of Psychology, International University in Moscow

125040, Russia, Moscow oblast', g. Moscow, ul. Leningradskii Prospekt, 17

t.aisuvakova@mmu.ru

DOI:

10.25136/2409-8701.2020.3.33033

Review date:

23-05-2020


Publish date:

30-05-2020


Abstract.

Mental experience is a necessary construct of self-regulation of behavior in a stressful situation. During the pandemics of a new coronavirus infection, metacognitive approach towards analysis of adaptation mechanism of regulation of behavior allows determining the resource potential of personality for the purpose of achieving social re-adaptation. Adequacy of cognitive assessment of a potential COVID-19 threat as a stressogenic factor characterizes the metacognitive model of coping behavior of a subject. Mental representations as coping resources of the system of self-regulation of personality define the nature of mental activity for overcoming a difficult life situation. In the conditions of COVID-19 pandemic increases the risk of mental disturbance due to cognitive dissonance in assessing the situation of potential threat as stressogenic factor. A destructive model of metacognitive activity as a method of regulation of stress resistance leads to maladaptive behavior of a subject based on cognitive distortions. As a factor of social disintegration, cognitive deteriorations negatively affect the subjective level of stress resilience, increasing the risk of chronification psychoemotional tension. The pilot research on the basis of Google platform involved 48 students. The assessment of acquired results is conducted with the use of correlation-regression analysis. It is determined that the adequate cognitive assessment of potential risk of coronavirus infection explains the internal constructive ensemble of the strategies of coping behavior with stressogenic situation of behavior. Therefore, the effective strategies of metacognitive regulation of behavior of a subject pertaining to COVID-19 contribute to social re-adaptation, associated with the need for inner transformation. Metacognitive model of dysfunctional fear regarding the threat of COVID-19 characterizes the external vector of destructive repertoire of coping strategies for regulation of behavior of a subject, and reflects negatively on the personal level.  Therefore, semantic field of metacognitive model of social re-adaptation by means of subjective control of behavior substantiates individual differences in the level of personal anxiety as a factor of stress resilience.

Keywords: cognitive biases, social readaptation, behavior control, coping strategy, coping behavior, stress tolerance, coping resource, mental representations, metacognitive model, dysfunctional fear
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Agazade N. Koping-strategii vo vremya krizisa / N. Agazade // Meditsinskaya psikhologiya v Rossii: elektron. nauch. zhurn. 2012. № 1. URL: http:// medpsy.ru (data obrashcheniya: 24.05.2020).
2.
Vasserman L.I., Iovlev B.V., Isaeva E.R., Trifonova E.A. Metodika dlya psikhologicheskoi diagnostiki sovladayushchego povedeniya v stressovykh i problemnykh dlya lichnosti situatsiyakh / L.I. Vasserman, B.V. Iovlev, E.R. Isaeva, E.A. Trifonova. SPb.: Psikhonevrologicheskii institut im. V.M. Bekhtereva, 2008. 36 s.
3.
Veiten U., Lloid M. Stress i ego effekty / U. Veiten, M. Lloid // Obshchaya psikhologiya. Teksty: v 3 t. T. 2. Sub''ekt deyatel'nosti. Kn.1 / Pod red. V.V. Petukhova, Yu.B. Dormasheva, S.A. Kapustina. M.: Genezis, 2002. S. 507-529.
4.
Zalevskii G.V. Fiksirovannye formy povedeniya na urovne individual'nykh i gruppovykh sistem (v kul'ture, obrazovanii, nauke, v norme i patologii) / G.V. Zalevskii // Izbrannye trudy: v 6 t. Tomsk: TGU, 2013. T. 2. C. 5-326.
5.
Zinchenko V.P. Opyt dumaniya o dumanii. K vos'midesyatiletiyu V.V. Davydova (1930-1998) / V.P. Zinchenko // Voprosy filosofii. 2010. № 11. S. 7-91.
6.
Moskovchenko D.V. Sovladayushchee povedenie zhenshchin s onkologicheskimi zabolevaniyami reproduktivnoi sistemy / D.V. Moskovchenko: avtoref. … diss. kand. psikhol. nauk. M., 2016. 36 s.
7.
Naisser U. Poznanie i real'nost' : Smysl i printsipy kognitivnoi psikhologii / U. Naisser; Per. s angl. V. V. Luchkova; Vstup. st. i obshch. red. B. M. Velichkovskogo. Blagoveshchensk : Blagoveshch. gumanitar. kolledzh im. I. A. Boduena de Kurtene, 1998. 229 s.
8.
Psikhodiagnostika stressa: praktikum / sost. R.V. Kupriyanov, Yu.M. Kuz'mina; Ministerstvo obrazovaniya i nauki RF, Kazan. gos. tekhnol. un-t. Kazan': KNITU, 2012. 212 s.
9.
Sergienko E.A. Model' psikhicheskogo kak novaya issledovatel'skaya paradigma kognitivnoi psikhologii / E.A. Sergienko // Uchenye zapiski Kazanskogo universiteta. Seriya Gumanitarnye nauki. 2015. T. 157, № 4. S. 265-279.
10.
Sirota N.A., Moskovchenko D.V., Yaltonskii V.M., Yaltonskaya A.V. Aprobatsiya kratkoi versii oprosnika metakognitivnykh ubezhdenii na russkoyazychnoi vyborke / N.A. Sirota, D.V. Moskovchenko, V.M. Yaltonskii, A.V. Yaltonskaya // Psikhologiya. Zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki. 2018. № 15 (2). S. 307-325.
11.
Fergus T., Bardeen J. The Metacognitions Questionnaire-30 / T. Fergus, J. Bardeen // Assessment. 2017. Vol. 26. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/312055556 (data obrashcheniya: 26.05.2020).
12.
Koch L., Jansen L., Brenner H., Arndt V. Fear of recurrence and disease progression in long-term (Q5 years) cancer survivors-a systematic revie wof quantitative studies / L. Koch, L. Jansen, H. Brenner, V. Arndt // Psychooncology. 2013. Vol. 22. p. 111-120. URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22232030 (data obrashcheniya: 22.05.2020).
13.
Stalder D.R., Anderson K.M. Are depressed individuals more susceptible to cognitive dissonance? / D.R. Stalder, K.M. Anderson // Current Research in Social Psychology. 2014. № 22. p. 10-19. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/289216135 (data obrashcheniya: 25.05.2020).
14.
Yao H., Chen J.-H., Xu Y.-F. Patients with mental health disorders in the COVID-19 epidemic / H. Yao, J.-H. Chen, Y.-F. Xu // The Lancet Psychiatry. 2020. № 4. e21. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/340044242 (data obrashcheniya: 20.05.2020).
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website