MAIN PAGE
> Back to contents
Politics and Society
Reference:
Popov E.A.
Sociologists and Social Reality: Borders of the Researcher’s Responsibility in Scientific Work
// Politics and Society.
2015. № 10.
P. 1375-1379.
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0684.2015.10.15469 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=15469
Социолог и социальная реальность: грани ответственности исследователя в научном труде
Popov Evgeniy Aleksandrovich
Doctor of Philosophy
Professor of the Department of Sociology and Conflictology of Altai State University
656038, Russia, Barnaul, 66 Dimitrova str., room 513А
|
popov.eug@yandex.ru
|
|
 |
Other publications by this author
|
|
|
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0684.2015.10.15469
Received:
03-06-2015
Published:
12-10-2015
Abstract:
The subject of the research is the culture of scientific work in the field of modern social and humanitarian knowledge, and, in particular, sociological science. It is worth mentioning that the research culture is connected not only with methodical security and professionalism of the scientists, but also with such categories as the researcher’s responsibility for the results, as well as search for the truth. The last factor is of great significant for the system of knowledge in general, and moreover, it impacts the justification of the results of the research. The main research method is theoretical analysis of the issue of scientist’s responsibility for the results of his/her study in the field of sociology. The main conclusions of the study are as follows: 1) scientific responsibility is one of the main factors of development of modern sciences and sociohumanitarian knowledge; 2) search for truth, and not only simple statements of scientific data is one of the most necessary conditions for the scientific research in sociology and also in sociohumanitarian knowledge in general.
Keywords:
sociocultural processes, cognition, norms, values, sociology, society, culture, methodology, science, problems of Sociology
References
1. Filippov A. K teorii sotsial'nykh sobytii // Logos. 2005. № 5 (50).
2. Gorshkov M. K. Dialog rossiiskoi sotsiologii s obshchestvom i vlast'yu (opyt proshlogo, perspektivy budushchego) // Filosofskie nauki. 2011. № 4.
3. Dobren'kov V. I. Metodologicheskie i epistemologicheskie problemy formirovaniya teoreticheskogo znaniya v sotsiologii // Vestnik Mosk. un-ta. Seriya 18. Sotsiologiya i politologiya. 2013. № 2.
4. Pavlov I. P. Lektsii po fiziologii. M., 1952.
5. El'chaninov V. A. Negativnaya metodologiya nauki: monografiya. Barnaul, 2012.
6. Ishchenko E. N. Problema real'nosti v filosofskom i gumanitarnom diskurse // Vestnik Mosk. un-ta. Seriya
7. Filosofiya. 2005. № 2. 7.Dobren'kov V. I. Tsennostno orientirovannaya sotsiologiya. Postanovka problemy // Vestnik Mosk. un-ta. Seriya 18. Sotsiologiya i politologiya. 2012. № 4.
8. Popov E. A. Kul'tura i dukhovnaya zhizn' cheloveka i obshchestva v sisteme sovremennogo sotsiologicheskogo znaniya i v usloviyakh rossiisko-aziatskogo polikul'turnogo vzaimodeistviya: monografiya. Barnaul, 2013.
9. Semilet T. A. Kul'turvitalizm – kontseptsiya zhiznennykh sil kul'tury: monografiya. Barnaul, 2004.
10. Epshtein M. N. Konstruktivnyi potentsial gumanitarnykh nauk: mogut li oni izmenyat' to, chto izuchayut? // Filosofskie nauki. 2008. № 12.
11. Pogrebnyak A. A., Raskov D. E. Ekonomika kak kul'tura: vozvrashchenie k «sporu o metodakh» // Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost'. 2013. № 2.
12. Sledzevskii I. V. Mul'tikul'turalizm: khrupkii balans mezhdu integratsiei i dezintegratsiei // Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost'. 2013. № 2.
13. Perov E.V. Monitoring sotsial'noi konfliktogennosti obshchestva // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. - 2014. - 4. - C. 574 - 583. DOI: 10.7256/2073-8560.2014.4.7826.
Link to this article
You can simply select and copy link from below text field.
|
