|
MAIN PAGE
> Back to contents
National Security
Reference:
Przhilenskiy V.I.
The logic of extremism: explanation vs. understanding
// National Security.
2016. № 3.
P. 408-416.
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0668.2016.3.19260 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=19260
Логика экстремизма: объяснение versus понимание
Przhilenskiy Vladimir Igorevich
Doctor of Philosophy
Professor of the Philosophical Department at Kutafin Moscow State Law Academy
125993, Russia, Moskovskaya oblast', g. Moscow, ul. Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya, 9, of. 1
|
vladprnow@mail.ru
|
|
|
Other publications by this author |
|
|
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0668.2016.3.19260
Received:
21-05-2016
Published:
06-07-2016
Abstract:
The subject of this research is the specificity of extremist thinking, structure and contents of targeting of the extremist oriented individuals. The article examines extremism as a special type of attitude of an individual towards the processes and phenomena taking place in the surrounding world, in other words, in social, cultural, and ethno-confessional environment. The author explores the two types of main sources of the modern extremism (archaic and modern), by the reaction upon which the emotional and value-hued antagonism of the events encouraging individuals to search the way out from the situation in hand, are being determined. The author substantiates the thesis on the insufficient efficiency of classical means and methods of the analysis of specificity of the extremist thinking, such as historical materialism, positivism, and structural functionalism. The article presents two types of social techniques, with the help of which the modern world finds a “solution” of the problem of an individual and a group captured by the extremist attitudes. The author proves that there is a connection of these techniques with the spatial-temporal localization of values that unites the historical-geographical, ethno-confessional and sociocultural determinants of self-identification. The threats of the external interference into this process, as well as the need for the effective countermeasures against its manipulative technologization, are being demonstrated.
Keywords:
extremist thinking, social tecniques, method, unique, universal, identity, manipulation, modern, archaic, philosophical hermeneutics
References
1. Yakh''yaev M.Ya. Istoki i prichiny sushchestvovaniya ekstremizma kak negativnogo sotsial'nogo yavleniya / http://www.ekstremizm.ru/biblioteka/item/187-istoki-i-prichiny-ekstremizma
2. Puankare A. O nauke. M.: Nauka, 1990. 736 s.
3. Gabriel Blouin Genest Le (dé)goût d’un printemps : la construction sociale de la violence et de l’extrémisme politique lors du conflit étudiant québécois // Cultures & Conflits. 87 (Automne 2012) Guerres et reconnaissance. R. 160-166.
4. Bodriiyar Zh. Gorod i nenavist' // Logos. 1997. № 9. S. 107-116.
5. Przhilenskii V.I. Upravlenie arkhaizatsiei: mezhdu etikoi, teleologiei i tekhnologiei // Filosofskie nauki. 2012. № 5. S. 9-19.
6. Gusev D.G. Upravlyaemyi khaos // Sotsiologiya upravleniya. Teoretiko-prikladnoi tolkovyi slovar' / Otv. red. A.V. Tikhonov. M.: Izdatel'stvo URSS, 2014. S. 282-283.
7. Fedotova V.G. Khoroshee obshchestvo. M.: Progress-Traditsiya, 2004. 544 s.
8. Gofman A.B. V poiskakh utrachennoi identichnosti: traditsii, traditsionalizm i natsional'naya identichnost' // Voprosy sotsial'noi teorii. 2010. T. IV. S. 241-254.
9. Aly A. Countering violent extremism: social harmony, community resilience and the potential counter-narrative in the Australian context // Counter-Radicalisation: Critical Perspectives. L.,NY.: Routledge, 2015. P. 71-88.
10. Fedotova N.N. Rol' identichnosti dlya razvitiya ekonomiki i modernizatsii // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2012. № 10. C. 76-86.
11. Khrenov N.A. Modernizatsionnye protsessy na rubezhe XX–XXI vekov i sud'ba traditsionnykh tsennostei // Kul'tura i iskusstvo. 2013. № 5. C. 544-555. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1956.2013.5.9570.
12. Shebanova M.A. Kosmopoliticheskaya identichnost' kak odna iz form transnatsional'nykh identichnostei // Politika i Obshchestvo. 2013. № 8. C. 1039-1051. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2013.8.8781.
13. Zhigal'tsova T.V. Podkhody k ponyatiyam "modern" i "postmodern" v teorii kul'tury // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2011. № 11. C. 102-113.
14. Rozin V.M. Pravdopodobnye konspirologicheskie teorii (diskursivnyi analiz) // Politika i Obshchestvo. 2016. № 3. C. 301-310. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2016.3.18273.
Link to this article
You can simply select and copy link from below text field.
|
|