Cherniadeva N.A.
Peculiarities of US position on the fight against terrorism in NATO and relationship with the EU
// National Security.
2016. № 5.
P. 594-599.
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0668.2016.5.18177 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=18177
Особенности позиции США по вопросам борьбы с терроризмом в НАТО и во взаимоотношениях с ЕС
Cherniadeva Natalia Alekseevna
Doctor of Law
Natalia A. Cherniadeva, Doctor of law, Professor, Department of State Law Disciplines.
Crimean branch of the Russian State University of Justice
614000, Russia, Permskii krai, g. Perm', ul. Bukireva, 15, of. 614000, g. perm', ul. Petropavlovskaya, 29-32
Abstract: The article explores the place of the United States in NATO and the contractual cooperation with the European Union on combating terrorism. The author pays special attention to the peculiarities of the American legal understanding of the phenomenon of terrorism, which cause specificity conduct counter-terrorism within the framework of NATO and the complexity of the relationship between the EU and the United States on international security issues. This study is based on the use of structural-functional approach, which allows setting the general and special in approaches towards the formation of the US, EU, and NATO counter-terrorism policies. The following conclusions were made: the author underlines tha there is a trend of presentation of the phenomenon of terrorism in both, NATO and US legal system, which requires military action. It is noted that NATO, as a military alliance, is not adjusted to the professional legal counteraction and investigation of terrorist crimes. In this regard, the author concludes that the appropriate participation of this organization in the sphere of anti-terrorism appears only as a local entity in relieving of the acute political crisis. The European Union, unlike the United States, demonstrates the opinion that terrorism is rather the phenomenon of criminal-legal norms than the question of the political struggle at the state level. The significant conceptual differences are determined between the EU and the US regarding counter-terrorism actions.
Keywords:
Terror threat, International anti-terrorism legislation, International humanitarian law, Political violence, International crime, European Union, NATO, United States, Terrorism, International security
References
1. Batyuk V.I. Mezhdunarodnoe soobshchestvo v bor'be s terrorizmom: problemy strukturizatsii // Vestnik Rossiiskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Politologiya. 2008. № 1. S. 5-19.
2. Dovgan' E.F. K voprosu o pravomernosti vooruzhennykh antiterroristicheskikh mer v kontekste printsipa nevmeshatel'stva vo vnutrennie dela gosudarstv // Belorusskii zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo prava i mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii. Mn., 2003. № 3. S. 3-12.
3. ES za sotrudnichestvo s SShA v bor'be s terrorizmom // URL: [Elektronnyi resurs] http://www.arms-expo.ru (Data obrashcheniya 13.05.2015).
4. Nazarov I.A. Evolyutsiya amerikanskikh kontseptual'nykh vzglyadov na prirodu mezhdunarodnogo terrorizma i metody bor'by s nim (2001-2004 gg.): dis. ... kand. ist. nauk. M., 2007. 180 s.
5. NATO i bor'ba s terrorizmom. 27-Oct-2010 17:27 // URL: [Elektronnyi resurs] http://www.nato.int/cps/ru/natohq/topics_48801.htm (Data obrashcheniya 13.05.2015)
6. Ustav NATO. Severoatlanticheskii Dogovor // URL: [Elektronnyi resurs] Http:Eurasian-Defence.Ru/?Q=Node/3872 (Data obrashcheniya 13.05.2015)
7. Aksoy E. International Terrorism in the Age of Globalization. Department of International Relations. Bilkent University. Ankara, 2002. 90 r.
8. Council of the European Union Framework Decision on Combating Terrorism, 13 June 2002 (2002/475/JHA) // URL [Elektronnyi resurs]: http://europa.eu/legislation_summaries (Data obrashcheniya 15.07.2015).
9. Draft resolution GA. Measures to eliminate international terrorism. Sixth Committee. Sixty-eighth session. Doc. A/C.6/68/L.13. 28 October 2013 // [Elektronnyi resurs] URL: http://www.un.org (Data obrashcheniya 15.06.2015)
10. EU counter-terrorism policy // URL [Elektronnyi resurs]: http://europa.eu/legislation_summaries (Data obrashcheniya 15.07.2015)
11. Framework Decision 2008/919/JHA, adopted on 28 November 2008. OJ L 330, 9.12.2008 // URL [Elektronnyi resurs]: http://europa.eu/legislation_summaries (Data obrashcheniya 15.07.2015)
12. Freeman C. America’s Diplomatic Crisis. June 16, 2015 // URL: [Elektronnyi resurs] www.teamamaricanconservative.com. (data obrashcheniya 16.07.2015)
13. Goldsmith J. The self-defeating International Criminal Court // The University of Chicago law review. Vol. 70. No. 1. 2003. R. 89-104.
14. Hamm M.S. Terrorism as Crime: From Oklahoma City to Al-Qaeda and Beyond. New York: New York University Press. 2007. 271 p.
15. Oliverio A US versus European Approaches to Terrorism: Size Really Does Matter// Policing. Vol. 2. Number 4. 2008. P. 452–462.
16. Sixth Committee Hears Working Group Reports, Approves Drafts on Programme Assistance, Measures To Eliminate International Terrorism. Sixth Committee. 28th Meeting (AM). Sixty-eighth General Assembly // URL: [Elektronnyi resurs] http://www.un.org (data obrashcheniya 16.07.2015)
17. Text of U.S.–EU Declaration On Combating Terrorism. U.S.–EU Summit. Dromoland Castle. Shannon, Ireland. 26 June 2004 // URL: [Elektronnyi resurs] http://www.state.gov/p/eur/rls/fs/36892.htm (data obrashcheniya 16.07.2015)
18. The EU Counter-Terrorism Policy: main achievements and future challenges Brussels, 20.7.2010. COM(2010)386 final. SEC(2010)911 // URL [Elektronnyi resurs]: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ (Data obrashcheniya 15.06.2015)
19. Yehuda Ben N. Terror, Media and Moral Boundaries // Terrorism: A New Testament. – Ontario, Canada: 2005. De Sitter. R. 39-64.
Link to this article
You can simply select and copy link from below text field.
