|
MAIN PAGE
> Back to contents
National Security
Reference:
Erzin A.I., Alistratova E.Y.
The problem of Juvenile cyber-delinquency in the aspect of studying the properties of identity of a cyber-aggressor
// National Security.
2016. № 2.
P. 286-293.
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0668.2016.2.15867 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=15867
Проблема подростковой преступности в сети Интернет в аспекте изучения свойств личности киберагрессора
Erzin Alexander Igorevich
PhD in Psychology
Docent, the department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Orenburg State Medical University
460000, Russia, g. Orenburg, ul. Sovetskaya, 6
|
alexerzini@gmail.com
|
|
 |
Other publications by this author
|
|
|
Alistratova Ekaterina Yur'evna
Medical psychologist, Juvenile drug service of Narcological Dispensary of Orenburg
460009, Russia, Orenburg, Nevelskaya Street 4 G, office #1
|
|
vintazh2008@mail.ru
|
|
 |
|
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0668.2016.2.15867
Received:
13-07-2015
Published:
28-05-2016
Abstract:
This article examines the problem of the illegitimate cyber behavior. The growth of juvenile delinquency is observed not only among the marginal population, but also, and what causes the most concern, among the psychically healthy society. The authors explore the psychological aspects of one of the main manifestation of the illegitimate cyber behavior – the intentional cyber-aggression; the classification of the forms of cyber-aggression is being presented. The authors give a hypothetical psychological portrait of a cyber-delinquent, as well as determine the leading motives for conducting the antisocial acts by the juveniles in the social networks. The research was conducted on 40 teenagers, which were divided into two subgroups. The first group consisted of 20 people from the drug rehabilitation center of Orenburg, who have repeatedly convicted of delinquent actions; the second group consisted of 20 conditionally healthy teenagers without clear signs of social dysadaptation. The correlation was determined between the experience in the role of cyber-aggressor and the following personal properties: ostentation, meticulousness, aggressiveness, and affectability. It is illustrated that the conditionally healthy teenagers are more prone to the intentional cyber-aggression. This circumstance encourages to improve the system of legal regulation among the Internet users, as well as to develop measure on prevention of the deviant cyber behavior.
Keywords:
cyber-aggression, cyberbulling, cyberpsychology, proactive aggression, antisocial behavior, Internet, personality traits, character structure, accentuations of character, deviant behavior
References
1. Voiskunskii A.E. Razvivaetsya li agressivnost' u detei i podrostkov, uvlechennykh komp'yuternymi igrami? // Voprosy psikhologii.-2010.-№ 6.-S. 133-143.
2. Godik Yu.O. Ugrozy i riski bezopasnosti detskoi i podrostkovoi Internet-auditorii // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta.-Seriya 10: Zhurnalistika.-2011.-№ 6.-S. 115-129.
3. Emelin V.A., Rasskazova E.I., Tkhostov A.Sh. Psikhologicheskie posledstviya razvitiya informatsionnykh tekhnologii // Natsional'nyi psikhologicheskii zhurnal.-2012.-№ 1.-S. 81-87.
4. Van Sh., Voiskunskii A.E., Mitina O.V., Karpukhina A.I. Svyaz' opyta potoka s psikhologicheskoi zavisimost'yu ot komp'yuternykh igr // Psikhologiya. Zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki.-2011.-T. 8.-№ 4.-S. 73-101.
5. Bondarenko A.V. Organizatsiya i normativno-pravovoe obespechenie kiberoborony Rossiiskoi Federatsii s uchetom peredovogo zarubezhnogo opyta // Voprosy zashchity informatsii.-2013.-№ 3 (102).-S. 92-99.
6. Voiskunskii A.E. Informatsionnaya bezopasnost': psikhologicheskie aspekty // Natsional'nyi psikhologicheskii zhurnal.-2010.-№ 1.-S. 48-53.
7. Alistratova E.Yu. Proaktivnaya agressiya v Internete: prichiny, posledstviya i vozmozhnye puti profilaktiki // NB: Psikhologiya i psikhotekhnika.-2014.-№ 1.-S. 39-54.
8. Erzin A.I. Diagnostika i korrektsiya agressivnogo povedeniya: Uchebnoe posobie.-Orenburg, 2012. – 247 s.
9. Erzin A.I.Problema proaktivnosti v psikhologii zdorov'ya // NB: Psikhologiya i psikhotekhnika.-2014.-№ 1.-S. 94-124.
10. Erzin A.I. Agressiya kak forma proaktivnogo povedeniya // Vestnik Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta.-2013.-№ 2 (151).-S. 77-80.
11. Erzin A.I. Gendernye razlichiya v reaktivnoi i proaktivnoi agressii u studentov // NB: Psikhologiya i psikhotekhnika.-2013.-№ 3.-S. 326-337.
12. Dodge, K. A., Coie, J. D., Lynam, D. Aggression and antisocial behavior in youth. In N. Eisenberg, W. Damon, & R. M. Lerner (Eds.) // Handbook of child psychology.-New York: Wiley, 2006.-P. 719–788.
13. Efimova E.S. Kiberbulling kak problema psikhopedagogiki virtual'nykh sred // Uspekhi v khimii i khimicheskoi tekhnologii.-2014.-T. 28.-№ 7 (156).-S. 65-66.
14. Zintsova A.S. Vliyanie kiberbullinga na lichnost' podrostka // Sbornik nauchnykh trudov Sworld.-2013.-T. 21.-№ 2.-S. 12-14.
15. Zintsova A.S. Sotsial'naya profilaktika kiberbullinga // Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N.I. Lobachevskogo. Seriya: Sotsial'nye nauki.-2014.-№ 3 (35).-S. 122-128.
16. Makeev O.Yu. Internet. Real'nost'. Kiberataki // Sotsial'no-gumanitarnye znaniya.-2011.-№ 8.-S. 283-287.
17. Aalsma M.C., Brown J.R. What is bullying? // Journal of Adolescent Health.-2008.-Vol. 43.-P. 101–102.
18. Anderson, T., Sturm, B. Cyberbullying: From playground to computer // Young Adult Library Services.-2007.-Vol. 5.-P. 24–27.
19. Ang R.P., Goh D.H. Cyberbullying among adolescents: the role of affective and cognitive empathy, and gender // Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 2010.-p. 41.
20. Brighi A., Guarini A., Melotti G., Galli S., Genta M.L. Predictors of victimization across direct bullying, indirect bullying and cyberbullying // Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties, 2012, p. 17.
21. Hinduja S., Patchin J.W. Bullying, cyberbullying, and suicide // Archives of Suicide Research, 2010.-p. 14.
22. McQuade S.C., Colt J.P., Meyer N. Cyber bullying: Protecting kids and adults from online bullies.-Praeger, California, 2009.
23. Pornari C.D., Wood J. Peer and cyber aggression in secondary school students: the role of moral disengagement, hostile attribution bias, and outcome expectancies // Aggressive Behaviour, 2010.-p. 36.
24. Schultze-Krumbholz A., Scheithauer H. Social-behavioural correlates of cyberbullying in a German student sample // Journal of Psychology, 2009. – p. 217.
25. Snakenborg J., van Acker R., Gable R. A. Cyberbullying: Prevention and Intervention to Protect Our Children and Youth // Preventing School Failure. – 2011. Vol. 55(2).-P. 88–95.
26. Steffgen G., König A., Pfetsch J., Melzer J.A. Are cyberbullies less empathic? Adolescents’ cyberbullying behavior and empathic responsiveness // Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 2011.-p. 14.
27. Williams, K. R., & Guerra, N. G.. Prevalence and predictors of Internet bullying // Journal of Adolescent Health. – 2007.-Vol. 41.-P. 14–21.
28. Ybarra M.L., Mitchell K.J. Online aggressor ⁄ targets, aggressors and targets: A comparison of associated youth characteristics // Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry.-2004.-Vol. 45.-P. 1308–1316.
29. Guseinova E.A., Enikolopov S.N. Vliyanie pozitsii podrostka v bullinge na ego agressivnoe povedenie i samootsenku // Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie-2014.-№ 2.-S. 246-256.
30. Voiskunskii A.E. Kiberpsikhologiya kak razdel psikhologicheskoi nauki i praktiki // Universum: Vestnik Gertsenovskogo universiteta.-2013.-№ 4.-S. 88-90.
31. Voiskounsky A.Ye. Psychology of computerization as a step towards the development of cyberpsychology // Psychology in Russia: State of the Art.-2013.-Vol. 6.-№ 4.-P. 150-159.
32. Voiskunskii A.E. Perspektivy stanovleniya psikhologii Interneta // Psikhologicheskii zhurnal.-2013.-T. 34.-№ 3.-S. 110-118
Link to this article
You can simply select and copy link from below text field.
|
|
