Сравнительный анализ уголовного законодательства некоторых европейских государств и России в области обеспечения транспортной безопасности

Ларина Любовь Юрьевна

doi:10.25136/2409-7543.2020.4.34100


	Journal Menu > Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy


	Journals in science databases


	About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!

При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.

По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents

Security Issues

Reference:

Larina L.Y. — Comparative analysis of criminal legislation of some European countries and Russia in the area of transportation safety // Security Issues. – 2020. – № 4. – P. 1 - 16. DOI: 10.25136/2409-7543.2020.4.34100 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=34100

Comparative analysis of criminal legislation of some European countries and Russia in the area of transportation safety

Larina Lyubov' Yur'evna

PhD in Law

Director of Law Institute, Ryazan State University named for S. A. Yesenin

390000, Russia, Ryazanskaya oblast', g. Ryazan', ul. Seminarskaya, 15

larina1708@yandex.ru

DOI:

10.25136/2409-7543.2020.4.34100

Review date:

14-10-2020

Publish date:

13-11-2020

Abstract.

The subject of this research is the current criminal legislation of a number of European countries and Russia in the area of ensuring transportation safety. Analysis is conducted on legislation of the countries with different legal systems (France, Germany, United Kingdom, and Poland). Special attention is given to the norms that determine the elements of specific offenses. The article also analyzes the penalties that can perform a function of ensuring transportation safety. The author draws parallels between foreign and Russian criminal legislation, outlines their strengths and weaknesses. Due to the rapid development of unmanned vehicles, foreign legislation is examined from the perspective of responsibility for harm inflicted by their usage. The author formulates a number of theoretical conclusions along with practical recommendations targeted at improvement of national criminal legislation. It was established that criminal legislation of the countries under consideration contains the norms aimed at ensuring transportation safety, which relate simultaneously to the description of specific offences and penalties thereof. In many countries, the elements of such offences are differentiated in accordance to various legislative acts. In foreign countries, the elements of offences related to damage or demolition of vehicles or other objects of transport infrastructure are formulated as formal, i.e. they do address any consequences as a mandatory element. Stationary platforms, which play an important role in transport infrastructure, serve as the subject of infringement on transport infrastructure objects. It is underlined that the indicated European countries establish stricter responsibility for the alcohol-related transport crimes than the Russian legislation. There are no special criminal legal norms applicable to unmanned vehicles in the considered legislation.
Keywords: driving, intoxication, public danger, European countries, criminal law, crime, safety, transport, disqualification, violation of rules
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References

1.	Borzykh S.S. Ugolovnaya politika zarubezhnykh stran v sfere bezopasnosti dorozhnogo dvizheniya // Vestnik tyumenskogo instituta povysheniya kvalifikatsii sotrudnikov MVD Rossii. – 2015. – № 1. – S. 190 – 198.
2.	Bokhan A.P., Ivanov V.D. Upravlenie transportnym sredstvom v sostoyanii op'yaneniya: ugolovnaya ili administrativnaya otvetstvennost'? // Yurist''-Pravoved''. – 2013. – № 5 (60). – S. 41 – 44.
3.	Gorbunova L.V. Osobennosti ugolovnoi otvetstvennosti za transportnye prestupleniya po zakonodatel'stvu zarubezhnykh stran // Aktual'nye problemy yuridicheskikh nauk: mater nauch. konf. – Ioshkar-Ola, 2007. S. 95 – 100.
4.	Dragunov D.K. Prestupleniya protiv bezopasnosti dvizheniya i ekspluatatsii transporta po ugolovnomu zakonodatel'stvu zarubezhnykh gosudarstv // Science Time. – 2020. – № 5 (77). – S. 20 – 24.
5.	Zemlin A.I. Administrativno-pravovye aspekty obespecheniya transportnoi bezopasnosti // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' i strategicheskoe planirovanie. – 2019. – № 4 (28). – S. 10 – 14.
6.	Ziganshin M.M. Administrativno-pravovoe regulirovanie deyatel'nosti politsii po obespecheniyu transportnoi bezopasnosti: dis. …kand. yurid. nauk. – M., 2017. – 242 c.
7.	Iroshnikov D.V. Teoreticheskie problemy legal'nogo opredeleniya transportnoi bezopasnosti i smezhnykh s nei kategorii // Voprosy bezopasnosti. – 2020. – № 1. – S. 17-29. DOI: 10.25136/2409-7543.2020.1.31878 URL: https://nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=31878
8.	Konyaev S.A. Obespechenie transportnoi bezopasnosti v sisteme garantii konstitutsionnogo prava na zhizn' : avtoreferat dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. – Voronezh, 2013. – 24 s.
9.	Koryakin V.M. O sootnoshenii ponyatiya «transportnaya bezopasnost'» so smezhnymi ponyatiyami v oblasti bezopasnosti na transporte // Transportnoe pravo i bezopasnost'. – 2017. – № 11 (23). – S. 26 –32.
10.	Larina L.Yu. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' za prichinenie vreda bespilotnym transportom // Sovremennoe sostoyanie i puti razvitiya ugolovnoi politiki: sbornik statei po materialam mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii, posvyashchennoi pamyati professorov V.A. Eleonskogo i N.A. Ogurtsova. – Arkhangel'sk, 2019. S. 73 – 76.
11.	Medvedev E.V., Silakova N.A. Avtotransportnye prestupleniya po ugolovnomu zakonodatel'stvu zarubezhnykh stran // Mezhdunarodnoe ugolovnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnaya yustitsiya. – 2020. – № 4. – S. 27 – 29.
12.	Murtazaeva M.N. Zarubezhnyi opyt obespecheniya bezopasnosti ob''ektov transportnoi infrastruktury ugolovno-pravovymi sredstvami // Prioritetnye nauchnye napravleniya i kriticheskie tekhnologii: sb. mater. III Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii. – Novosibirsk, 2018. S. 126 – 129.
13.	Petrov S.A. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' za narusheniya pravil, obespechivayushchikh bezopasnuyu rabotu transporta po ugolovnomu zakonodatel'stvu Rossii i Kitaya // Aktual'nye voprosy bor'by s prestupleniyami. – 2014. – №1. – S. 80 – 83.
14.	Sarkisova V.G. Ugolovno-pravovoe obespechenie bezopasnosti ob''ektov transportnoi infrastruktury: diss. …kand. yurid. nauk. – Stavropol', 2014. – 223 s.
15.	Simorot S.Yu., Egorova I.A., Putintseva Ya.O. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' za narusheniya pravil, obespechivayushchikh bezopasnuyu rabotu avtotransporta, po ugolovnomu zakonodatel'stvu Rossii i Kitaya // Osnovnye tendentsii razvitiya pravovoi nauki: Mater. I Mezhdunarodnoi studencheskoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii. – Khabarovsk, 2020. S. 333 – 337.
16.	Fokin M.S., Ryazanov N.S. Aktual'nye problemy ugolovno-pravovoi reglamentatsii protivopravnogo ispol'zovaniya bespilotnykh mobil'nykh sredstv // Aktual'nye problemy rossiiskogo prava. – 2018. – №1 (86). – S. 103 – 110.
17.	Khachaturyan N.M. Sovremennoe ugolovnoe zakonodatel'stvo zarubezhnykh stran ob otvetstvennosti za transportnye prestupleniya // Nauka i obrazovanie: khozyaistvo i ekonomika; predprinimatel'stvo; pravo i upravlenie. – 2017. – № 3 (82). – S. 115 – 117.
18.	Shishenkov K.S. Zarubezhnyi opyt ugolovno pravovogo obespecheniya bezopasnosti dvizheniya i ekspluatatsii transporta // Sovremennaya yurisprudentsiya: aktual'nye voprosy, dostizheniya i innovatsii: sbornik statei XXII Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii. – Penza, 2019. 117 – 120.
19.	Aviation and Maritime Security Act 1990. URL: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1990/31/contents (data obrashcheniya: 20.09.2020).
20.	Aviation security act 1982. URL: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1982/36/section/2 (data obrashcheniya: 20.09.2020).
21.	Code de la route. URL: https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/codes/section_lc/LEGITEXT000006074228/LEGISCTA000006159535/2020-10-11/(data obrashcheniya: 20.09.2020).
22.	Code des transports 2010. URL: https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/codes/section_lc/LEGITEXT000023086525/LEGISCTA000023069390/2020-10-11/(data obrashcheniya: 20.09.2020).
23.	Code penal. URL: https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/codes/section_lc/LEGITEXT000006070719/LEGISCTA000006165296?isSuggest=true#LEGISCTA000006165296 (data obrashcheniya: 20.09.2020).
24.	Douma F., Aue Palodichuk A. Criminal Liability Issues Created by Autonomous Vehicles // Santa Clara Law Review. – 2012. – №52(4). – P. 1157–1169.
25.	Kodeks karny. URL: https://www.arslege.pl/kodeks-karny/k1/ (data obrashcheniya: 20.09.2020).
26.	Road Traffic Act 1988. URL: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1988/52/contents (data obrashcheniya: 20.09.2020).
27.	Road Traffic Offenders Act 1988. URL: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1988/53/contents (data obrashcheniya: 20.09.2020).
28.	Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984/ URL: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1984/27/contents (data obrashcheniya: 20.09.2020).
29.	SAE J3016, 2018. Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to Driving Automation Systems for On-Road Motor Vehicles. SAE Standard.
30.	Sander G.M., Hollering J. Strafrechtliche Verantwortlichkeit im Zusammenhang mit automatisiertem Fahren // Neue Zeitschrift für Strafrecht. 2017. – № 37. – R. 193 – 206.
31.	Strafgesetzbuch.URL: http://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/stgb/index.html#BJNR001270871BJNE050702307 (data obrashcheniya: 20.09.2020).
32.	Straßenverkehrsgesetz (StVG). URL: http://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/stvg/BJNR004370909.html#BJNR004370909BJNG000301308 (data obrashcheniya: 20.09.2020)

Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.