Статья 'Теоретико-методологические аспекты управления обеспечением национальной безопасности ' - журнал 'Вопросы безопасности' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Security Issues
Reference:

Theoretical and Methodological Aspects of National Security Management

Belov Petr

Doctor of Technical Science

Professor of the Department of Natural Technogenic Threats and Risk Management at Moscow Aviation Institute

121609, Russia, g. Moscow, ul. Rublevskoe Shosse, 44 - 1 - 152

safsec@mail.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

DOI:

10.25136/2409-7543.2018.4.26775

Review date:

05-07-2018


Publish date:

30-08-2018


Abstract.

The subject of this research is to develop an adequate framework of categories and concepts and modern methods of system research as well as to improve the management of the national security process in general and information-psychological and industrial-environmental spheres of national security in particular. The rationale of thsi research is caused both by the imperfection of the current paradigm of national security (mostly of humanitarian descriptive nature) and the growing issue of preservation of nations and strategic stability as a result of the intensified struggle for deficit natural resources. The methodology of national security management is an interdisciplinary instrument that is based on the energy-enthropic concept and classification of real dangers, and includes such contemporary research methods as systems analysis on the basis of categoric thinking and modelling and systems synthesis of measures necessary to improve the management-by-objective of the national security. The novelty of the research is caused by the following: the author gives a definition of  national, information-psychological and industrial-environmental security, describes the subject matter and contents of relevant professional activities and chosen inderdisciplinary instrument to manage and improve the aforesaid spheres of security, and demonstrates reliability of these definitions. These definitions may be used in the university and post-graduate educational processes as well as professional activity of experts. 

Keywords: system, risk, modeling, calls, threats, dangers, interests, values, needs, damage
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Wolfers A. “National Security” as an Ambiguous Symbol. Political Science Quarterly. 1952. Vol. LXVII. No. 4. PP. 483 – 496. URL: https://www.jstor.org /stable/2145138?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents/ (Data obrashcheniya: 24.06.2018).
2.
Po ukazannym vyshe prichinam slovosochetaniya tipa «upravlenie bezopasnost'yu, kache-stvom, riskom…» ne yavlyayutsya korrektnymi, chto uzhe osoznano razrabotchikami sovremen-nykh mezhdunarodnykh standartov. Vmesto termina «upravlenie» imi rekomenduetsya «me-nedzhment», t.e. rukovodstvo kakim-libo predpriyatiem s aktsentom sootvetstvuyushchei deya-tel'nosti na obespechenie tam bezopasnosti, kachestva i minimal'nogo riska..
3.
Mennena M.G., van Tuyllb M.C. Dealing with future risks in the Netherlands: the National Se-curity Strategy and the National Risk Assessment // Journal of Risk Research, 2015. No 7. PP. 860 – 876. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2014.923028. (Data obrashcheniya: 12.06.2018).
4.
ISO/IEC 31010:2009. Risk Management. URL: https://www.iso.org/standard /51073.html. (Data obrashcheniya: 01.07.2018).
5.
Global Risks Report 2018yu 13th edition. http://www.iccwbo.ru/news/2018_WEF_GRR18_Report.pdf (Data obrashcheniya: 04.07.2018).
6.
Yudin N. Rasshirenie problematiki issledovanii bezopasnosti. Mezhdunarodnye pro-tsessy. 2017, № 1. S. 60 – 78.
7.
Bezopasnost' Rossii. Pravovye, sotsial'no-ekonomicheskie i nauchno-tekhnicheskie aspek-ty. Mnogotomnoe izdanie / pod red. K.V. Frolova, N.A. Makhutova. M.: Znanie. 1999 – 2018.
8.
Obshchaya teoriya natsional'noi bezopasnosti. Uchebnik / Pod red. A.A. Prokhozheva. M.: Izd-vo RAGS. 2002. 320 s.
9.
Tak kak v prirode vse postoyanno dvizhetsya, to sokhranenie tam chego-libo nevozmozhno bez ego izmeneniya. Sledovatel'no, leleemaya rukovodstvom kakogo-libo gosudarstva «stabil'-nost'» mozhet byt' vygodnoi lish' emu, no ne vsei etoi strane, kotoraya v budushchem neiz-bezhno otstanet v svoem razvitii ot drugikh gosudarstv, a zatem – proigraet konkurentnuyu bor'bu i uidet v istoricheskoe nebytie.
10.
Tret'yakova L.P. Programmno-tselevye metody upravleniya: istoricheskii i sovremen-nyi kontekst. Barnaul: Izd-vo Altaiskogo un-ta. 2015. 282 s.
11.
Teoriya upravleniya: terminologiya. AN SSSR: Komitet po nauchno-tekhnicheskoi terminologii. M.: Nauka. 1988. 56 s.
12.
Belov P.G. Upravlenie riskami: sistemnyi analiz i modelirovanie. M.: Yurait, 2014. 712 s.
13.
Termin «entropiya» oznachaet meru khaosa, strukturnoi neuporyadochennosti i degradatsii svyazei mezhdu chastyami lyuboi tselostnosti. V zakrytykh sistem entropiya vsegda uvelichiva-etsya, chto zavershaetsya prevrashcheniem ikh informatsii v shum, veshchestva – v pyl', a energii – v teplo, a vot otkrytye (biologicheskie) sistemy uspeshno boryutsya s ee rostom, i osobenno effektivno delayu eto v pervuyu tret' svoei zhizni.
14.
Dannyi bol'shoi i slozhnyi ob''ekt nazvan avtorom «etnogeoetosistemoi»: ethnos – narod, geo – zemlya, ethos – etos (obychai, traditsii, svyatyni i inye dukhovnye tsennosti konkretnogo chelovecheskogo soobshchestva, evolyutsionno sformirovavshiesya s uchetom spetsifiki territorii ego prozhivaniya).
15.
Il'enkov E.V. Dialektika abstraktnogo i konkretnogo v nauchno-teoreticheskom mysh-lenii / 2-e izdanie. M.: ROSSPEN. 1997. 464 s.
16.
Gorelova G.V., Ryabtsev V.N. Modelirovanie arkhitektury i dinamiki geopoliticheskikh protsessov sovremennogo mira. Kognitivnyi podkhod. Rostov na Donu. 2014. 245 s.
17.
Belov P.G. Natsional'naya bezopasnost'. Teoriya, metodologiya, praktika. SPb: Stra-tegiya budushchego.1996. 486 s.
18.
Gvardeitsev M.I, Kuznetsov P.G., Rozenberg V.Ya. Matematicheskoe obespechenie upravle-niya. Mery razvitiya obshchestva. M.: Radio i svyaz'. 1996. 246 s.
19.
Lepskii V.E. Tekhnologii upravlyaemogo khaosa kak kompleksnoe upravlenie cherez sredu. M.: Kogito-Tsentr. 2015. 212 s.
20.
Sunstein C.R. Why Nudge? The Politics of Libertarian Paternalism, Security-Single-Superpower. Yale University Press. 2015. URL: https://www.amazon.com/ Why-Nudge-Politics-Libertarian-Paternalism/dp/0300212690/ (Data obrashcheniya: 01.07. 2018).
21.
Schneier B. Data and Goliath: The Hidden Battles to Collect Your Data and Control Your World. Norton & Company. 2015. URL: https://www.schneier.com /books/data_and_goliath/ (Data obrashcheniya: 01.07. 2018)
22.
Kovalev V.I., Matvienko Yu.L. «Povedencheskaya» voina kak odna iz perspektivnykh nevoennykh ugroz natsional'noi bezopasnosti Rossii. // Informatsionnye voiny. 2016. №4. S. 20 – 25.
23.
Drenick R. Mathematical Theory of Organization, N-Y.: Acad. Press.1986. 340 p.
24.
Zade L.A. Ponyatie lingvisticheskoi peremennoi i ego primenenie k prinyatiyu reshe-nii / Per. s angl. M.: Mir. 1976. – 196 s.
25.
Dyubua D., Prad A. Teoriya vozmozhnostei. Prilozheniya k predstavleniyu znanii v in-formatike. M.: Radio i svyaz'. 1990. 288 s.
26.
Belov P.G., Fateeva E.V. Issledovanie vliyaniya demograficheskogo vyzova na natsional'nuyu bezopasnost' Rossii // Materialy VNK «Strategii Rossii v istoricheskom i mirovom prostranstve». M.: INION RAN. 2009. S. 601 – 612.
27.
K sozhaleniyu, russkii yazyk ne imeet sinonima slovu «bezopasnost'», a ego primene-nie v kachestve priznaka my obychno uvyazyvaem s potentsial'noi zhertvoi. Inoe delo – angliiskii: «safety» vsegda otnositsya tam k istochniku ugroz (industrial, nuclear safety), a «security» (homeland, information security) – k potentsial'noi zhertve. Slepoe zhe kopirovanie nami, naprimer, poslednego slovosochetaniya, ponimaemogo kak «zashchita informatsii» ignoriruet to, chto informatsiya yavlyaetsya takzhe istochnikom ugroz.
28.
Belov P.G. Zakonodatel'stvo i natsional'naya bezopasnost' // Svobodnaya mysl'. 1996. № 7. S. 45 – 49.
29.
ISO-704. 2009. Terminology Work. Principles and Methods. URL: https://www.iso.org/standard/31696.html. (Data obrashcheniya 01.07. 2018).
30.
Levis T.G. Critical Infrastructure Protection in Homeland Security. John Willey & Sons. 2006. 584 p. URL: https://www.amazon.com/Critical-Infrastructure-Protection-Homeland-Security/dp/0471786284 (Data obrashcheniya: 01.07. 2018).
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website