Роль несудебных средств разрешения споров по возвращению культурных ценностей

Видинеев Денис Игоревич

doi:10.7256/2454-0633.2016.1.17667


	Journal Menu > Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium


	Journals in science databases


	About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents

International Law and International Organizations

Reference:

Vidineev D.I. The role of non-judicial means of dispute resolution on the return of cultural values // International Law and International Organizations. 2016. № 1. P. 41-49. DOI: 10.7256/2454-0633.2016.1.17667 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=17667

Роль несудебных средств разрешения споров по возвращению культурных ценностей

Vidineev Denis Igorevich

Post-graduate student, the department of International Law, Peoples' Friendship University of Russia

117198, Russia, Moscow, Mikluho-Maklaya Street 6

denisvid@yandex.ru

Article was published in rubric "International organizations and peaceful resolution of disputes"

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0633.2016.1.17667

Received:

21-01-2016

Published:

02-03-2016

Abstract: Currently, the majority of the disputes on the cultural values are being reviewed by the national courts; at the same time, the aforementioned disputes are regularly being resolved via such mechanism as “negotiations”. The author examines the importance of negotiations representing the non-judicial means of dispute settlement on the restoration of the cultural values. This work analyzes the multilateral conventions with regards to the cultural values, bilateral agreements between the states (including between the states and museums), world treaties between the states, museums and private parties, and the decisions of the national courts. The disputes, associated with the requirements on restitution or restoration of the cultural values, are being reviewed. The author concludes that currently both, the judicial and non-judicial means of dispute settlement such as negotiations, can be applied for the effective conflict resolution pertaining to the cultural values; however, the return of the works of art located in foreign territories has to be achieved by the virtue of negotiations between the two subjects of the dispute, first and foremost, between the states.

References

1. Konventsii ob okhrane i pooshchrenii raznoobraziya form kul'turnogo samovyrazheniya. YuNESKO. Parizh, 20 oktyabrya 2005 g. [Elektronnyi resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0014/001429/142919r.pdf (data obrashcheniya 5.01.2016 g.).
2. Konventsii ob okhrane podvodnogo kul'turnogo naslediya. YuNESKO. Parizh, 2 noyabrya 2001 g. [Elektronnyi resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0012/001246/124687r.pdf#page=60 (data obrashcheniya 5.01.2016 g.).
3. Konventsiya o merakh, napravlennykh na zapreshchenie i preduprezhdenie nezakonnogo vvoza, vyvoza i peredachi prava sobstvennosti na kul'turnye tsennosti. YuNESKO. Parizh, 14 noyabrya 1970 g. [Elektronnyi resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0013/001333/133378mo.pdf (data obrashcheniya 5.01.2016 g.).
4. Rekomendatsii o merakh, napravlennykh na zapreshchenie i preduprezhdenie nezakonnogo vyvoza, vvoza i peredachi prava sobstvennosti na kul'turnye tsennosti. YuNESKO. Parizh, 19 noyabrya 1964 g. [Elektronnyi resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0011/001145/114581rb.pdf#page=157 (data obrashcheniya 5.01.2016 g.).
5. Konventsiya o zashchite kul'turnykh tsennostei v sluchae vooruzhennogo konflikta. Gaaga, 14 maya 1954 g. [Elektronnyi resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: https://www.icrc.org/rus/resources/documents/misc/treaties-cultural-properties-140554.htm (data obrashcheniya 5.01.2016 g.).
6. Vtoroi protokol k Gaagskoi Konventsii o zashchite kul'turnykh tsennostei v sluchae Vooruzhennogo Konflikta 1954 goda, Gaaga, 26 marta 1999 g. [Elektronnyi resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: http://www.un.org/ru/documents/decl_conv/conventions/hague_conv_2nd_prot.shtml (data obrashcheniya 5.01.2016 g.).
7. Von Schorlemer, ‘UNESCO Dispute Settlement’, in A.A. Yusuf (ed.), Standard-Setting in UNESCO, Normative Action in Education, Science and Culture (Vol. I) (2007) 73, at 74 if.
8. Cornu and Renold, ‘Le renouveau des restitutions de biens culturels: les modes alternatifs de règlement des litiges’, JDI (2009) 493, at 517.
9. Nafziger, ‘International Penal Aspects of Protecting Cultural Property’, Int’lLaw. (1985) 835 if.
10. Madonna and Child in a Landscape. North Carolina Museum of Art Foundation, Inc. [Elektronnyi resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: http://ncartmuseum.org/art/detail/madonna_and_child_in_a_landscape1 (data obrashcheniya 1.12.2015 g.).
11. Yellin, ‘North Carolina Art Museum Says It Will Return Painting Tied to Nazi Theft’, N. Y Times, 6 February 2000.
12. Vidineev D.I. Mezhdunarodno-pravovye problemy restitutsii sobstvennosti zhertv Kholokosta. Aktual'nye problemy sovremennogo mezhdunarodnogo prava [Tekst]: materialy X ezhegodnoi Vserossiiskoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii, posvyashchennoi pamyati professora I.P. Blishchenko. V 2-kh ch. Ch. II. M., 13–14 aprelya 2012 g. / Otv. red. A.Kh. Abashidze, E.V. Kiseleva. M.: RUDN, 2012. 540 s.
13. Restitutsionnyi skandal razreshili za 20 millionov dollarov. OOO «Lenta.Ru». 5 iyulya 2010 g. [Elektronnyi resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: http://lenta.ru/news/2010/07/05/schiele/ (data obrashcheniya 1.12.2015 g.).
14. Dolgoe delo «Portreta Valli» Egona Shile» blizko k zaversheniyu. ARTinvestment.RU. 10.07.2010 g. [Elektronnyi resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: http://artinvestment.ru/news/artnews/20100710_egon_schiele.html (data obrashcheniya 1.12.2015 g.).
15. United States v Portrait of Wally, 105 F.Supp. 2d 288 (S.D.N.Y. 2000), 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18713 (S.D.N.Y. 28 Dec. 2000), 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6445 (S.D.N.Y. 2002), 663 F. Supp. 2d 232 (S.D.N.Y. 2009), No. 99-CV-09940 (S.D.N.Y. filed 29 July 2010).
16. Spiegler, ‘What the Lady Has Wrought: The Ramifications of the Portrait of Wally Case’, Art & Advocacy, The Art Law Newsletter of Herrick, Feinstein LLP. (2010), vol. 7, at 1—5.
17. Dobrzynski, ‘The Zealous Collector: A Singular Passion for Amassing Art, One Way or Another, N.Y. Times, 24 December 1997.
18. Press Release, The Art Law Group of Herrick, Feinstein LLP, ‘The United States of America, the Estate of Lea Bondi Jaray and the Leopold Museum Settle the Long-Standing Case Involving “Portrait of Wally” by Egon Schiele’, 20 July 2010. [Elektronnyi resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: http://info.herrick.com/rs/vm.ashx?ct=24F76A15D4AE4EE0CDD881AFD42F921E91907ABFDA9818CF5AE175767CEAC80BDF416 (data obrashcheniya 1.12.2015 g.).
19. Neshataeva V.O. Kul'turnye tsennosti. Tsena i pravo. Seriya «Issledovaniya kul'tury». Nats. issled. un-t «Vysshaya shkola ekonomiki»: Izd. dom Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki; M., 2013. 118 s.
20. ‘Agreement Concerning the Imposition of Import Restrictions on Categories of Archaeological Material Representing the Pre-Classical, Classical, and Imperial Roman Periods of Italy’, 19 January 2001, (2001) I.L.M. 1031 ff.
21. The agreement with China. [Elektronnyi resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: www.rio.beniculturali.it/index.phpiit/129/furti-sca vi-illeciti-importazione-ed-esportazione-illegale (data obrashcheniya 1.12.2015 g.).
22. The agreement with Switzerland can be found in GU Suppl. to No. 171 of 23 July 2008.
23. Merryman J.H., Elsen A.E., Urice S.K. Law, Ethics and the Visual Art. 5th ed. Kluwer Law International, 2007. 1354 p.
24. The agreement between the Government of Peru and Yale University concluded in November 2010. [Elektronnyi resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: http://opac.yale.edu/peru/english/mou.html (data obrashcheniya 1.12.2015 g.).
25. Taylor, ‘Yale and Peru Sign Accord on Machu Picchu Artifacts’, N. Y. Times, 11 February 2011.
26. Scovazzi, Diviser c’est détruire". Ethical Principles and Legal Rules in the Field of Return of Cultural Properties’, Rivista di diritto internazionale (2010) 341, at 380.
27. Minyard, Adding Tools to the Arsenal: Options for Restitution from the Intermediary Seller and Recovery for Good-Faith Possessors of Nazi-Looted Art’, Tex. Int’lL.J. (2007-2008) 115, at 116.
28. Lowenthal, ‘Recovering Looted Jewish Cultural Property’, in International Bureau of the Permanent Court of Arbitration (ed.), Resolution of Cultural Property Disputes (2004) 139, at 156.
29. Attorney General of New Zealand v Ortiz [1982] 3 QB 432, rev’d, [1984] A.C. 1, add’d, [1983] 2 All E.R. 93.

Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.