Статья 'Актуальные вопросы согласования решений о получении информации о соединениях между абонентами и (или) абонентскими устройствами ' - журнал 'Юридические исследования' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Council of editors > Redaction > Peer-review process > Peer-review in 24 hours: How do we do it? > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Publication in 72 hours: How do we do it? > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Legal Studies
Reference:

Relevant questions of decisions agreement on receipt of information on connection between subscribers and/or devices

Bagavieva Elina Aleksandrovna

Postgraduate student, the department of Criminal Procedure and Law Enforcement Activity, Udmurt State University

422231, Russia, respublika Tatarstan, g. Agryz, ul. Naberezhnaya, 2 A

elina.bagavieva@mail.ru

DOI:

10.25136/2409-7136.2020.6.33186

Review date:

10-06-2020


Publish date:

10-08-2020


Abstract.

This article analyzes the procedural autonomy of an investigator and agreement of investigative work with the head of the investigative branch or prosecutor. The object of this research is the relations forming in the process of decisions agreement on receipt of information on connection between subscribers and/or devices. The author examines the questions of the role of the investigator, head of investigative branch and the prosecutor in this procedure. Analysis was conducted on the legislative and departmental normative legal act regulating the authority of the aforementioned officers, corresponding law enforcement practice, as well as literary sources dedicated to this issue. The research substantiates the conclusion that there is a need for ensuring procedural autonomy of the investigator, including through the means of voiding the need for agreement from the head of the investigative branch or prosecutor to forego filing for court warrant to obtain information. The autonomy of the investigative branches from prosecutor’s office can be ensured by delegation of authority by agreement of procedural decisions that require prosecutor’s approval over to the head of the investigative branch. The question of allowability of circumvention of the right to privacy of phone communication is the subject of consideration of the request to obtain information on connection between subscribers and/or devices by a court.

Keywords: restriction of human rights, investigation group, procedural management, departmental control, information about connection, head of the inquiry body, head of the investigative body, procedural independence, accommodation, personnel problem
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Za potentsial'no zaraznymi kuzbassovtsami budut sledit' cherez sotovye telefony (10.04.2020) [Elektronnyi resurs] // Informatsionnoe agenstvo «Gorod Novostei». URL: https://www.city-n.ru/ (data obrashcheniya: 20.05.2020).
2.
Gavrilov B.Ya. Kakim byt' apparatu vlasti sledstvennoi? // V kn. Apparat vlasti sledstvennoi / pod red. N.A. Kolokolova. – M.: Yurlitinform, 2016. S. 105-124.
3.
Stel'makh V.Yu. Sledstvennye deistviya, napravlennye na poluchenie svedenii, peredavaemykh po sredstvam svyazi: monografiya. – Ekaterinburg, 2015. 216 s.
4.
Voskobitova L.A. Kakim byt' apparatu vlasti sledstvennoi? // V kn. Apparat vlasti sledstvennoi / pod red. N.A. Kolokolova. – M.: Yurlitinform, 2016. S.59-104.
5.
Goryunov V.V. Protsessual'naya samostoyatel'nost' sledovatelya v svete reformy sledstvennogo apparata // Rossiiskii sledovatel'. 2012. №19.S. 13–16.
6.
Magomedov A.Sh. Soglasie rukovoditelya sledstvennogo organa na vozbuzhdenie khodataistva pered sudom: neobkhodimost' ili prepyatstvie // Tambov: Gramota. 2013. №7 (33). Ch.1. S.139-141.
7.
Rossinskii S.B. Kakim dolzhen byt' rossiiskii sledovatel'? (k 25-letiyu Kontseptsii sudebnoi reformy RSFSR) // Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika. 2016. №10. S.93-100.
8.
Tat'yanina L.G. Zashchita lichnosti v kontekste polnomochii sledovatelya // Prioritetnye napravleniya razvitiya pravovoi sistemy obshchestva: materialy V Mezhdunar. nauch.-prak. kon., Gomel', 15-16 maya 2014 / M-vo obrazovaniya i nauki Resp. Belarus', UO «Gomel'skii gosudarstvennyi universitet imeni Frantsiska Skoriny. 2014. S.114-119.
9.
Sheifer S.A. Kakim byt' apparatu vlasti sledstvennoi? // V kn. Apparat vlasti sledstvennoi / pod red. N.A. Kolokolova. – M.: Yurlitinform, 2016. S.223-247.
10.
Talyneva Z.Z. Protsessual'naya samostoyatel'nost' doznavatelya kak real'naya neobkhodimost' // Aktual'nye problemy gosudarstva i obshchestva v oblasti obespecheniya prav i svobod cheloveka i grazhdanina, 2016. №19-4. S.49-52.
11.
«Ugolovno-protsessual'nyi kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii» ot 18.12.2001 №174-FZ (red. ot 01.04.2020) [Elektronnyi resurs] // SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus». URL: http://www.consultant.ru/ (data obrashcheniya: 19.05.2020).
12.
Bagavieva E.A. Khodataistvo o poluchenii informatsii o soedineniyakh mezhdu abonentami i (ili) abonentskimi ustroistvami // Vestnik Udmurtskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, Seriya: Ekonomika i pravo. 2019. T.29, vyp.6. S.801-805.
13.
Apellyatsionnoe postanovlenie Murmanskogo oblastnogo suda ot 2 iyulya 2019 goda po ugolovnomu delu №22k-825/2019 // Arkhiv Lovozerskogo raionnogo suda Murmanskoi oblasti.
14.
Prikaz MVD Rossii ot 08.11.2011 №58 (red. ot 29.07.2016) «O protsessual'nykh polnomochiyakh rukovoditelei sledstvennykh organov» [Elektronnyi resurs] // SPS Konsul'tantPlyus. URL: http://www.consultant.ru (data obrashcheniya: 21.05.2020).
15.
Prikaz SK Rossii ot 17.10.2014 №89 (red. ot 06.07.2017) «Ob ob''eme protsessual'nykh polnomochii rukovoditelei sledstvennykh organov Sledstvennogo komiteta Rossiiskoi Federatsii» [Elektronnyi resurs] // SPS Konsul'tantPlyus. URL: http://www.consultant.ru (data obrashcheniya: 21.05.2020).
16.
Prikaz FSB Rossii ot 28.11.2019 №58 «Ob ob''eme protsessual'nykh polnomochii» [Elektronnyi resurs] // SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus». URL: http://www.consultant.ru/ (data obrashcheniya: 21.05.2020).
17.
Stel'makh V.Yu. Uchastniki polucheniya informatsii o soedineniyakh mezhdu abonentami i (ili) abonentskimi ustroistvami // Aktual'nye problemy rossiiskogo prava. 2013. №1 (26). S.91-96.
18.
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 01.06.2017 №19 «O praktike rassmotreniya sudami khodataistv o proizvodstve sledstvennykh deistvii, svyazannykh s ogranicheniem konstitutsionnykh prav grazhdan (stat'ya 165 UPK RF)» [Elektronnyi resurs] // SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus». URL: http://www.consultant.ru/ (data obrashcheniya: 26.05.2020).
19.
Tuzova E.V. K voprosu o protsessual'noi samostoyatel'nosti sledovatelya v svete sootnosheniya protsessual'nykh polnomochii prokurora i rukovoditelya sledstvennogo organa // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. 2015. № 10. S.226-232.
20.
Tat'yanina L.G. Protsessual'naya samostoyatel'nost' sledovatelya – garant zakonnogo i kachestvennogo rassledovaniya prestupleniya // Nravstvennye osnovy pravookhranitel'noi deyatel'nosti: materialy Vseros. nauch.-prakt. konf., 15 dek. 2009 g. / Bashkir. gos. un-t. – Ufa, 2010. S.35-39.
21.
Tat'yanina L.G. Nravstvennye nachala deyatel'nosti sledovatelya // Sudebnaya vlast' i ugolovnyi protsess. 2015. №4. S.137-140.
22.
Federal'nyi zakon «O vnesenii izmenenii v Ugolovno-protsessual'nyi kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii i Federal'nyi zakon "O prokurature Rossiiskoi Federatsii"» ot 05.06.2007 №87-FZ (red. ot 22.12.2014) [Elektronnyi resurs] // SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus». URL: http://www.consultant.ru/ (data obrashcheniya: 26.05.2020).
23.
Federal'nyi zakon ot 30 dekabrya 2015 g. №440-FZ «O vnesenii izmenenii v Ugolovno-protsessual'nyi kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii v chasti utochneniya polnomochii nachal'nika organa doznaniya i doznavatelya» [Elektronnyi resurs] // SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus». URL: http://www.consultant.ru/ (data obrashcheniya: 26.05.2020).
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website