Статья 'Постнеклассическая определенность и основы структурной организации «знания» ' - журнал 'Философская мысль' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Peer-review process > Peer-review in 24 hours: How do we do it? > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Publication in 72 hours: How do we do it? > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial board
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Philosophical Thought
Reference:

Post-nonclassical certainty and the basis of structural organization of “knowledge”

Sorokin Roman Vladimirovich

Manager, Typography “Nizhegorodskiy Pechatnik”

606000, Russia, Nizhegorodskaya oblast', g. Dzerzhinsk, ul. Griboedova, 27

Romsor36@mail.ru

DOI:

10.25136/2409-8728.2019.6.30310

Review date:

16-07-2019


Publish date:

23-07-2019


Abstract.

This article turns to one of the key gnoseological problems – the problem of “knowledge”. In the context of the ongoing transition from nonclassical scientific rationality towards post-nonclassical, the author assets the existence of value component of the modern scientific (scientific-philosophical) knowledge. The common to post-nonclassical rationality representation on irrecoverability of the value component of knowledge, confronts the scientific-philosophical rationality and the known modern ideas of relativism, skepticism, pluralism, and postmodernism. In this aspect, the post-nonclassical approach to knowledge is revealed as a topical general philosophical problem of the basis of modern public functioning and development. Therefore, the subject of this research becomes the epistemological specificity and public perspectives of post-nonclassical definition of knowledge. Research methodology leans on the methods of analysis, synthesis, abstraction, idealization, comparison, generalization, systematization, historical-logical method, system approach, hermeneutics and heuristics. The conducted analysis leads to acceptance and recognition of the theoretical productivity of post-nonclassical assertion of the value basis of knowledge. It is revealed that the current and future impact of relativism, skepticism, pluralism and postmodernism is directly attributable to an ultimate focus of modern civilization on ensuring decent and free life of the people. It is underlined that the responsible for emergence, functioning and development of modernist civilization knowledge loses its worldview significance. The modern monistic scientific-philosophical tradition must constantly confirm the leading role in social life in the context of equitable communication on all important questions with all other traditions and points of view.

Keywords: pluralism, monism, relativism, worldview, epistemology, value, knowledge, post-non-classical rationality, modernist civilization, communication
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Astashova N.D. Aspekty gendernogo vospriyatiya znaniya // Epistemologiya segodnya. Idei, problemy, diskussii: monografiya. Nizhnii Novgorod: Izd. NNGU, 2018. S. 26-31.
2.
Pris' I.E. Znanie kak istinnoe obosnovannoe mnenie i sluchai Gettiera // Filosofskaya mysl'. 2018. № 6. S. 41-52. DOI: 10.25136/2409-8728.2018.6.23396 URL: https://nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=23396.
3.
Nikiforov A.L. Chto takoe znanie? Poiski opredeleniya // Epistemologiya segodnya. Idei, problemy, diskussii: monografiya. Nizhnii Novgorod: Izd. NNGU, 2018. S. 7-20.
4.
Stepin V.S. Teoreticheskoe znanie. M.: Progress-traditsiya. 2003. 744 s.
5.
Lektorskii V.A. O probleme znaniya // Epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki. 2009. № 3. S. 74-76.
6.
Brandenburg V.Ya. K probleme stanovleniya nauchnogo poznaniya: ot klassicheskoi nauki k sovremennomu etapu // Filosofskaya mysl'. 2016. № 9. S. 66-73. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8728.2016.9.20281 URL: https://nbpublish.com/ library_read_article.php?id=20281.
7.
Matyunin B.G. Znanie i neznanie // Sovremennyi filosofskii slovar'. M., Bishkek, Ekaterinburg: Izd. «Odissei», 1996. S. 190-191.
8.
Kant I. Kritika chistogo razuma. SPb.: IKA «TAIM-AUT», 1993. 477 s.
9.
Fragmenty rannikh grecheskikh filosofov. Ch. 1. Ot epicheskikh teokosmogonii do vozniknoveniya atomistiki. M.: Nauka, 1989. 576 s.
10.
Reale Dzh., Antis'eri D. Zapadnaya filosofiya ot istokov do nashi dnei. I. Antichnost'. SPb.: «Petropolis», 1994. 336 s.
11.
Gaidenko P.P. Evolyutsiya ponyatiya nauki. Stanovlenie i razvitie pervykh nauchnykh programm. Moskva: Nauka, 1980. 567 s.
12.
Gaidenko P.P. Evolyutsiya ponyatiya nauki (XVII-XVIII vv). Formirovanie nauchnykh programm novogo vremeni. M.: Nauka, 1987. 447 s.
13.
Kirsanov V.S. Nauchnaya revolyutsiya XVII veka. M.: Nauka, 1987. 343 s.
14.
Nikiforov A.L. Analiz ponyatiya znaniya: podkhody i problemy // Epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki. 2009. № 3. S. 61-73.
15.
Frantsuzova N.P. Relyativizm // Filosofskii entsiklopedicheskii slovar'. M.: Sov. entsiklopediya, 1989. S. 554.
16.
Mamchur E.A. O relyativnosti, relyativizme i istine // Epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki. 2004. № 1. S. 76-80.
17.
Mikeshina L.A. Relyativizm kak epistemologicheskaya problema // Epistemologiya segodnya. Idei, problemy, diskussii: monografiya. Nizhnii Novgorod: Izd. NNGU, 2018. S. 201-212.
18.
Zabluzhdayushchiisya razum? Mnogoobrazie vnenauchnogo znaniya. Moskva: Politizdat, 1990. 464 s.
19.
Niiniluoto I. Kriticheskie zamechaniya o kognitivnom relyativizme // Voprosy filosofii. 2015. № 1. S. 40-44.
20.
Levin G.D. Sovremennyi relyativizm // Voprosy filosofii. 2008. № 8. S. 73-82.
21.
Kamyu A. Buntuyushchii chelovek. Filosofiya. Politika. Iskusstvo. M.: Politizdat, 1990. 415 s.
22.
Maslov V.M. Vysokie tekhnologii i fenomen postchelovecheskogo v sovremennom obshchestve: monografiya. Nizhnii Novgorod: Izd. NGTU, 2014. 130 s.
23.
Tyapin I.N. NBICS-konvergentsiya kak orudie raschelovechivaniya: tekhnologiya i ideologiya // Revolyutsiya i evolyutsiya: modeli razvitiya v nauke, kul'ture, sotsiume: sbornik nauchnykh statei. N. Novgorod: NNGU, 2017. S. 152-154.
24.
Slyusarev V.V. Filosofiya «chernogo zerkala»: perevorot v mozgakh iz kraya v krai… // The Digital Scholar: Philosopher’s Lab. Tsifrovoi uchenyi: laboratoriya filosofa. 2011. T. 2. № 1. S. 22-32. DOI: 10.5840/dspl2019212
25.
Liseev I.K., Petrova E.V., Fesenkova E.V., Khen Yu.V. Nauki o zhizni segodnya: filosofskie innovatsii. M.: IF RAN, 2016. 239 s.
26.
Kasavin I.T. Zony obmena kak predmet sotsial'noi filosofii nauki // Epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki. 2017. T. 51. № 1. S. 8-17.
27.
Dorozhkin A.M. Problema postroeniya i tipologii zon obmena // Epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki. 2017. T. 51. № 4. S. 20-29.
28.
Voronina N.N., Tkachev A.N Mirovozzrencheskie predposylki uspeshnogo funktsionirovaniya galisonovskikh «zon obmena» // Filosofskaya mysl'. 2018. № 12. S. 10-17. DOI: 10.25136/2409-8728.2018.12.27896 URL: https://nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=27896.
29.
Shibarshina S.V. «Polevaya» filosofiya i problema vzaimodeistviya mezhdu filosofami i razlichnymi sotsial'nymi gruppami // Tsifrovoi uchenyi: laboratoriya uchenogo. 2018. T. 1 (1). № 1. S. 190-211.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website