Статья 'К вопросу реформирования современного немецкого языка под воздействием феминистской критики языка ' - журнал 'Филология: научные исследования' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Philology: scientific researches
Reference:

К вопросу реформирования современного немецкого языка под воздействием феминистской критики языка

Antropova Natalia

Doctor of Philology

professor of the Department of Humanities at Transbaical Business Institute, Branch of the Siberian University of Consumer Cooperation

672086, Russia, Zabaikal'skii krai, g. Chita, ul. Leningradskaya, 16, kab. 435

naantropova@rambler.ru

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0749.2015.4.17404

Received:

27-12-2015


Published:

15-02-2016


Abstract: The subject of the study is the antisexist reform of the German language. The objective of the study is to show how feminist critique of language can affect not only the public language policy, but also the state of the national language based on the example of Germany. The incessant polemic referring to this phenomenon, both in the scientific community and the media, confirms the actuality of the subject. In Germany, many of the criticisms of feminist linguistics were perceived positively and taken into account in developing a strategy of antisexist use of the German language. The author considers: the causes which called into existence a feminist critique of language, its nature, and the signs of androcentrism in the language. The focus is on eliminating gender asymmetries in the German language and legally fixed antisexist use of the German language in various spheres of public life. The author studied the texts of scientific publications, legislation, websites and German media to identify gender-correct language.It was established that the field of application of innovations eliminating sexism in German language is gradually expanding. However, it turned out that gender-correct language attached to a great extent to women's magazines, the other media tend to use the gender-correct forms only in certain cases.


References
1. Grimm J. Deutsche Grammatik. Dritter Teil. Göttingen, 1831.
2. Jespersen O. Die Sprache. Ihre Natur, Entwicklung und Entstehung. Heidelberg, 1925.
3. Mishel' A. Doloi stereotipy! Preodolet' seksizm v knigakh dlya detei i shkol'nykh uchebnikakh. Parizh: YuNESKO, 1986.
4. Gendernyi glossarii proekta «Resursy gendernogo obrazovaniya» [Elektronnyi resurs] // Natsional'naya entsiklopedicheskaya sluzhba Rossii : [sait]. URL: http: //vocabulary.ru/ dictionary/ 43/ word/ (data obrashcheniya: 14.04.2015).
5. Kirilina A. V. Gendernye issledovaniya v zarubezhnoi i rossiiskoi lingvistike (Filosofskii i metodologicheskii aspekty) // Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost'. 2000. № 4. S. 138-143.
6. Pusch L. Das Deutsche als Männersprache. Aufsätze und Glossen zur feministischen Linguistik. Frankfurt/M: Suhrkamp, 1984.
7. Klann-Delius G. Sprache und Geschlecht. Stuttgart: Verlag J.B. Metzler, 2005.
8. Pusch L. Das Deutsche als Männersprache. Aufsätze und Glossen zur feministischen Linguistik. Frankfurt/M: Suhrkamp, 1984.
9. Lexikon Sprache: Feministische Linguistik [Electronic ressource] // Metzler Lexikon Sprache / Hrsg. von H. Glück. 2. Ausgabe. Berlin : Directmedia Publishing GmBH, 2004. Band 34. 1 elektron. opt. disk (CD-ROM). S. 2950-2955.
10. Guentherodt I., Hellinger M., Pusch L.F., Trömel-Plötz S. Richtlinien zur Vermeidung sexistischen Sprachgebrauchs // Linguistische Berichte. № 69. 1980. S. 15-21.
11. Hellinger M., Bierbach Ch. Eine Sprache für beide Geschlechter: Richtlinien für einen nicht-sexistischen Sprachgebrauch. Bonn: Deutsche Unseco-Kommission, 1993.
12. Müller S., Fuchs C. Handbuch zur nichtsexistischen Sprachverwendung in öffentlichen Texten. Frankfurt/ Main : Fischer, 1993.
13. Braun F. Mehr Frauen in die Sprache. Leitfaden zur geschlechtergerechten Formulierung. Kiel, 1991.
14. Lexikon Sprache: Feministische Linguistik [Electronic ressource] // Metzler Lexikon Sprache / Hrsg. von H. Glück. 2. Ausgabe. Berlin : Directmedia Publishing GmBH, 2004. Band 34. 1 elektron. opt. disk (CD-ROM). S. 2950-2955.
15. Klann-Delius G. Sprache und Geschlecht. Stuttgart: Verlag J.B. Metzler, 2005.
16. Haß-Zumkehr U. Hat die Frauenbewegung Wortschatzgeschichte geschrieben? Chancen und Probleme korpuslinguistischer Analysen // Germanistische Linguistik. 2003. № 169-170. S. 161-179.
17. Fedotova, M. Naimenovaniya zhenshchin po professii v sovremennom nemetskom yazyke // Puti i perspektivy integratsii gendernykh metodov v prepodavanie sotsial'no-gumanitarnykh distsiplin : Materialy nauch. konf., Tver', 2-4 iyunya 2000 g. Tver', 2000. S. 74-80.
18. Haß-Zumkehr U. Hat die Frauenbewegung Wortschatzgeschichte geschrieben? Chancen und Probleme korpuslinguistischer Analysen // Germanistische Linguistik. 2003. № 169-170. S. 161-179.
19. Eichhoff-Cyrus K.-M. Neues Recht: Sprachliche Gleichbehandlung der Geschlechter vor dem Gesetz // Muttersprache. Jahrgang 112. 4/2002. S. 324-336.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.