Philosophy and Culture - rubric Controversy and debate
ïî
Philosophy and Culture
12+
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Editorial board > Council of editors > About the journal > Requirements for publication > Peer-review process > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy
Journals in science databases
About the Journal
MAIN PAGE > Journal "Philosophy and Culture" > Rubric "Controversy and debate"
Controversy and debate
Spirova E.M. -
Abstract:
SULTANOVA, M.A. - THE ORIGIN OF MORALS. PART 2 pp. 0-0
Abstract:
REZNIK, Y.M. - INDIVIDUAL IN THE SEARCH OF MEANING OF BEING AND OF HAPPINESS (REFLEXING THOUGHTS) pp. 0-0
Abstract:
Manev, Ivan A. - Is the thought spacial and material? pp. 0-0
Abstract: the article contains philosophical and experimental evidence that the thought is spacial and material. The thought is viewed as an unknown and unexplored penetrative field form of matter. The author talks about a very important attribute of the matter on the whole, the memory. Based on this attribute, he has concluded that the Universe was born due to that attribute and eternal changes and movement of the matter. The author has given a broader definition of the “matter” and stressed out that, having reached a certain stage of evolution, it gave birth to the conscience. The proved spacial and material nature of the thought has allowed to build the hypothesis which explains the old illusion about “soul reincarnation” from the point of view of the materialistic philosophy. The author has also given a very unusual explanation of the human unconsciousness.
Keywords: philosophy, field form of the matter, attribute, memory, hypnotic sleep, the unconscious, soul reincarnation.
- Round table about religion and teaching. pp. 0-0
Abstract: the idea of opening theological faculties in universities has been widely discussed lately. Raising the issue of relations between religion and philosophy, S. Neretina, A. Ogurtsov and V. Rozin (All PhDs at Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences) insisted that such an approach to science and philosophy would surely be a failure. The main principle of philosophy of education had always been, they said, the autonomy of universities from the church and government.
Keywords: philosophy, religion, science, Orthodoxy, dogma.
Spirova, E. M. - Symbol as an Image and Concept (Response to V. A. Podoroga’s Comments) pp. 96-105
Abstract: The article talks about a symbol as a concept of philosophical anthropology. The author tries to show a double function of a symbol which can act both as an image and a concept. Such interpretation of symbol was supported by the members of the Thesis Board when the author defended his thesis for a Doctor’s degree. At the same time, the thesis arose many discussions and debates. In this article the author is answering questions asked by Valery Alexandrovich Podoroga during defense who noted that symbol was closer to an image than a philosophical concept.
Keywords: philosophy, symbol, concept, philosophical anthropology, image, mystics, analysis.
Fatenkov, A. N. - On the Dispute of Human Destiny: Phenomenological Realism against Post-Modernism (Polemic Response to V. A. Kutyrev’s Monographs) pp. 97-105
Abstract: This article is a polemic response to V. A. Kutyrev’s monographs ‘Philosophical Image of our Time (Lifeless Worlds of Post-Human) (Smolensk, 2006); ‘Human and the Other: Struggle of the Worlds’ (S. Petersburg, 2009)
Keywords: philosophy, human, realism, phenomenology, V. A. Kutyrev, post-modernism, post-modern, post-human
Gurevich, P. S. - Let Them Talk… pp. 106-109
Abstract: The author tells his own opinion on Vladimir Alexandrovich Kutyrev works. It makes us think of the section ‘polemics’ in Philosophy and Culture journal. However, the section ‘polemics’ suggests that the other authors’ views are treated delicately. ‘Let them talk’ is the name of a TV show. However, it does not reflect the meaning of philosophical polemics. The author admits that even he isn’t quite sure that he follows the rule of polemics regarding the other article of the journal. He still hopes he will be understood
Keywords: philosophy, post-modernism, human, personality, mind, insanity, being, death of human, life
Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.