Статья 'Мысль vs чувство' - журнал 'Философия и культура' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Philosophy and Culture
Reference:

Мысль vs чувство

Gurevich Pavel Semenovich

head of the division at Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences

109240, Russia, g. Moscow, ul. Goncharnaya, 12, str. 1, of. -

gurevich@rambler.ru
Other publications by this author
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0757.2016.8.20280

Received:

02-09-2016


Published:

16-10-2016


Abstract: Multiple authors underline the discord between the thoughts and the feelings, which attributable to the modern man. It is noted that English-American analytical philosophy and continental existential philosophy are extremely disengaged. Moreover, the though and the feeling in the modern consciousness constantly try to rid themselves of each other. We can notice such discord in mundane, routine consciousness. What is the cause of this confrontation? How the mind can reunite with emotions? These questions are covered in the article. The author actively uses the achievements of analytical philosophy and existential experience, as well as applies the method of historicism, which allows demonstrating the dynamics of correlation between the thought and the feeling in different eras. This work contains the analysis of different concepts associated with the problem of though-feeling interrelation. A critical assessment is given to the projects which do not consider the achievements of analytical psychology. The solution to this problem consists in overcoming of these two extremities.  Of course the noticeable discord between the thought and the feeling is needed to be overcome, but at the same time, the abstract reasoning on sentimental upbringing does not take into account difficulties inherent to human psyche. The author suggests an opinion that not all abilities of a specific human can be unequivocally developed.


Keywords:

Grief, Envy, Mindset, Suffering, Philosophizing, Deeds, Rationality, Feeling, Reasoning, Philosophical anthropology

References
1. Nitsshe F. Mysli o moral'nykh predrassudkakh. Sverdlovsk: Volya, 1991. 303 s.
2. Epshtein M.N. Ot znaniya – k tvorchestvu. Kak gumanitarnye nauki mogut izmenit' mir. M.; SPb.: Tsentr gumanitarnykh initsiativ, 2016. 480 s.
3. Makhlin V.L. Bol'shoe vremya: Podstupy k myshleniyu M.M. Bakhtina. Siedlce: Uniw. przyrodniczo-humanistyczny, 2015. 174 s.
4. Ol'shanskii D. Stseny seksual'noi zhizni. Psikhoanaliz i semiotika teatra i kino. SPb.: Aleteiya, 2016. 384 s.
5. Pomerants G., Mirkina Z. Spor tsivilizatsii i dialog kul'tur (Lektsii i stat'i nulevykh godov). M.; SPb.: Tsentr gumanitarnykh initsiativ, Universitetskaya kniga, 2014. 504 s.
6. Yung K.G. Psikhologicheskie tipy / Per. s nem. S. Lorie. SPb.: Azbuka, 2001. 732 s
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.