Статья 'Тяжких дум избыток (Критические комментарии к докладу проф. Э.Ю. Соловьёва «Философия как критика идеологий» на первом заседании «Общеинститутского семинара» Института философии РАН, 7 июня 2016 г.)' - журнал 'Философия и культура' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Philosophy and Culture
Reference:

Тяжких дум избыток (Критические комментарии к докладу проф. Э.Ю. Соловьёва «Философия как критика идеологий» на первом заседании «Общеинститутского семинара» Института философии РАН, 7 июня 2016 г.)

Gurevich Pavel Semenovich

head of the division at Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences

109240, Russia, g. Moscow, ul. Goncharnaya, 12, str. 1, of. -

gurevich@rambler.ru
Other publications by this author
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0757.2016.7.19641

Received:

04-07-2016


Published:

07-09-2016


Abstract: This article is dedicated to the role of philosophy as an opposing instance with regards to ideology. This topic has a long history behind it, during the course of which the various outlooks upon this issue have been establishing. The discourse “criticism of ideologies”, having become relevant during the Enlightenment era, reflected the most popular commentary on this subject. The theory of interest, according to which reasoning of a person is defined by its instinctive or conscious interests, was developing within the theory of intentional deception. Over two centuries have passed since that time. A powerful intellectual movement aimed at criticism of ideology, irrevocably assigned to it a status of “false consciousness”.  Basing himself on the fundamental ideas of Solovyev, who presented an extensive program for debunking the ideology at a methodological seminar in the Institute of Philosophy, the author attempts to expand the frameworks of discussion on this topic.  For the first time in Russian philosophy, the author suggests a thought that the “criticism of ideology” as a certain research paradigm aimed at its exposure, outlived itself. A purely cognitive rejection of this phenomenon is not being accompanied by the versatile examination of the social phenomenon itself – ideology. As a result, the perception of ideology as an illusion became just the first level of thoughts on the matter.


Keywords:

Openness of history, Truth, Deception, Cynicism, Skepticism, Historicism, Social myth, Ideology, Philosophy, Power

References
1. Solov'ev E.Yu. Prospekt doklada «Filosofiya kak kritika ideologii» na pervom zasedanii «Obshcheinstitutskogo seminara» Instituta filosofii RAN, 7 iyunya 2016 g. URL: http://iph.ras.ru/uplfile/root/news/archive_events/2016/07_06_2016_soloviev.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 15.06.2016).
2. Bodriiyar Zh. Simulyakry i simulyatsii. M.: Izd. dom «Postum», 2015. 240 s.
3. Riker P. Mozhet li byt' nauchnoi kontseptsiya ideologii? // Teorii ideologii i ideologicheskoi bor'by: sb. Vyp. 3 / Otv. red. P.S. Gurevich. M., 1980. S. 266-285.
4. Sloterdaik P. Kritika tsinicheskogo razuma / Per. s nem. A.V. Pertseva. Ekaterinburg: Izd-vo Ural'skogo universiteta, 2001. 584 s.
5. Glucksman A. Cynisme et passion. Paris, 1991. 415 p.
6. Bodriiyar Zh. Prozrachnost' zla. M.: Dobrosvet; KDU, 2006. 258 s.
7. Granov V.D., Gurevich P.S., Semchenko A.T. V poiskakh dukhovnoi opory. M.: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 1981. 210 s.
8. Gurevich P.S. Mekhanika politicheskoi mifologii // Psikhologiya i psikhotekhnika. 2013. № 7. S. 621-626.
9. Spirova E.M. Filosofsko-antropologicheskoe soderzhanie simvola. M.: «Kanon +» ROOI «Reabilitatsiya», 2012. 336 s.
10. Ellyul' Zh. Politicheskaya illyuziya / Pod red. V.I. Danilenko. M.: NOTA BENE, 2003. 432 c
11. E.A. Grossman Andre Glyuksman o psikhologii vlastitelei mysli // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika. - 2010. - 7. - C. 27 - 43.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.