Ñòàòüÿ 'Ãð¸çû ïî êóëüòóðå' - æóðíàë 'Ôèëîñîôèÿ è êóëüòóðà' - NotaBene.ru
ïî
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Philosophy and Culture
Reference:

Ãð¸çû ïî êóëüòóðå

Larin Yurii

Doctor of Philosophy

Professor, the department of Philosophy, Tyumen State University

625007, Russia, Tyumen, Deputatskaya Street 129, office #200

jvlarin@mail.ru
Other publications by this author
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0757.2016.4.17604

Received:

16-01-2016


Published:

14-06-2016


Abstract: In the context of polarization of the modern scientific discourse with regards to the assessment of the historical roles and prospects of culture, this article examines the problematics related to the explication of essence and meaning of culturocentrism. Based on the critical analysis of the existing points of view, an idea is formed that in the scale of the global-historical trajectory of humanity – Syncretism of Primordiality – Cosmocentrism of Antiquity – Theocentricism of Medieval Times – Anthropocentrism of Renaissance – Naturocentrism of New Time – Sociocentrism Modern Time – Culturocentrism of Postmodern Time –, the latter can be understood as a quite regularly maturing in this list era of the positioning of culture as a constituting center of the belief system “human-world”. Based on the idea about the structural-functional homology of “rough cores” of the established “centrisms”, the author makes an attempt to model the attributive content of the culturocentric imperatives in ontological, methodological, anthropological, existential, practical, axiological, gnoseological, epistemological, and culturological projections. It is possible that at the present time, “history draws culture” towards where it itself “is being drawn” by culture; thus, each of us unaffected by the level and form of understanding, can be a participant or a creators of the extremely complicated and contradictory phenomena and processes that objectively take place  within the space of namely this attractor. The conclusion is made that the conceptual context of the discussed problematics includes a significant scientific, as well as practically life interest; and the problematics itself requires a serious conceptual study.


Keywords:

Prospects of culture, Humanity, Projections, Imperative, Explication, Worldview, Historical experience, Attractor, Culturocentrism, Culture

References
1. Antologiya issledovanii kul'tury. T.1. Interpretatsii kul'tury. Sankt-Peterburg. — Universitetskaya kniga, 1997. — 728 s.
2. Sapronov P.A. Kul'turologiya: kurs lektsii po teorii i istorii kul'tury. — SPb.: SOYuZ, 1998. — 560 s.
3. Abramyan E.G. Kul'turologiya i problemy vyzhivaniya // Filosofskie nauki. — 2000. — ¹ 4. — S. 53-57.
4. Alieva O.G. Politika mul'tikul'turalizma i vyzov natsional'noi samobytnosti // Vestnik Rossiiskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Filosofiya. — 2015. — ¹ 2. — S. 61-67.
5. Fuko M. Volya k istine: po tu storonu znaniya, vlasti i seksual'nosti. Raboty raznykh let. Per. s frants. — M., Kastal', 1996. — 448 s.
6. Bodriiyar Zh. V teni molchalivogo bol'shinstva, ili Konets sotsial'nogo. Izdatel'stvo Ural'skogo universiteta, 2000. — 96 s.
7. Bertil'sson M. Vtoroe rozhdenie prirody: posledstviya dlya kategorii sotsial'noe // Sotsis. — 2002. — ¹ 9. — S. 118-128.
8. Richerson P., Boid R. Kul'tura — chast' biologii cheloveka: pochemu ponyatie superorganicheskogo sosluzhilo plokhuyu sluzhbu naukam o cheloveke // Vyzov poznaniyu. Strategii razvitiya nauki v sovremennom mire. – M.: Nauka, 2004. — S. 344-373.
9. Bibler V.S. Ot naukoucheniya — k logike kul'tury: dva filosofskikh vvedeniya v dvadtsat' pervyi vek. — M.: Politizdat, 1990. — 413 s.
10. Vizgin V.P. Poststrukturalistskaya metodologiya istorii: dostizheniya i predely // Odissei. Chelovek v istorii. 1996. — M.: Coda, 1996. — S. 39-59.
11. Gurevich P.S. Kul'turologiya. Uchebnoe posobie. — M.: Znanie, 1996. — 288 s.
12. Kostina A.V., Flier A.Ya. Kuda istoriya vlechet kul'turu? (Ot «obshchestva kontsertiruyushchikh» k «obshchestvu repetiruyushchikh») // Vestnik Chelyabinskoi gosudarstvennoi akademii kul'tury i iskusstv. — 2009. — T. 20. — ¹ 4. — S .27-37.
13. Polishchuk V.I. Istoriya i kul'tura v filosofii kul'tury // Filosofiya i kul'tura. — 2014. — ¹ 5. — S. 754-759. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2014.5.11856.
14. Fedotova V.G. Kul'turotsentrizm // Novaya filosofskaya entsiklopediya: V 4 t. / In-t filosofii RAN, Nats. obshch-nauchn. fond; Nauchno-red. sovet: preds. V.S. Stepin, zamestiteli preds.: A.A. Guseinov, G.Yu. Semigin, uch. sekr. A.P. Ogurtsov. — T.2. — M., Mysl', 2001. — 634 s. http://library.plankion.kz/index.php?Itemid=40&func=fileinfo&id= 999 &option=comremository (data obrashcheniya 06.01.2016).
15. Osipova N.O. Kul'turotsentrizm kak aspekt metodologii sovremennogo gumanitarnogo znaniya // Vysshee obrazovanie dlya XXI veka: V mezhdunarodnaya nauchnaya konferentsiya. Moskva, 13–15 noyabrya 2008 g.: doklady i materialy. Sektsiya 9. Vysshee kul'turologicheskoe obrazovanie. Chast' II / otv. red. Kostina A.V. (izd. 2-e., ispravlennoe) — M.: Izd-vo Mosk. gumanit. un-ta, 2008. — S. 19-23.
16. Somkin A.A. Kul'turotsentrizm kak osnovnoe napravlenie formirovaniya sovremennoi sotsiogumanitarnoi paradigmy //Materialy II Mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii «Mezhkul'turnaya kommunikatsiya v sovremennom obshchestve». Saransk, 26.09.-31.10.2011 g. (Yazyk. Kul'tura. Obshchestvo. Vypusk 3. 2011 g.) http://yazik.info/2011-21.php (data obrashcheniya 20.01. 2016 g.)
17. Semernik S.Z. Kul'turotsentrizm kak antiteza ekonomotsentrichnomu razvitiyu sotsiuma // Sotsiokul'turnaya dinamika global'nykh protsessov: Nauchnye trudy kafedry globalistiki i geopolitiki (k 25-letiyu). — S-Peterburg: [B. i.], 2014. — S. 49-57.
18. Artanovskii S.N. Kul'tura dlya cheloveka ili chelovek dlya kul'tury? Kritika kontseptsii kul'turotsentrizma // Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta kul'tury i iskusstv. — 2004. — ¹ 1. — S. 165-166.
19. Morozova O.F. Kul'turotsentrizm v upravlenii kul'turnymi protsessami // Psikhologiya i upravlenie kul'turnymi kommunikatsiyami. — 2014. — ¹ 1. — S. 140-144.
20. Sladkova A.A. Al'ternativa deontologizma i kul'turotsentrizma v istolkovanii sotsial'noi legitimatsii // Vestnik Tverskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Filosofiya. — 2015. — ¹ 2. — S. 212-216.
21. Orlova E.A. Teoriya kul'tury kak nauchnaya distsiplina// «Lichnost'. Kul'tura. Obshchestvo». — 2000. — T. 2. Vyp. 4 (6). — S. 178-196.
22. Pushkar' A.I. Kul'tura kak samovyrazhenie cheloveka v mire // Deyatel'nostnoe ponimanie kul'tury kak vida chelovecheskogo bytiya: Materialy I Mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii (Nizhnevartovsk, 17-18 dekabrya 2003 goda) / Otv. red. V.I. Polishchuk. — Nizhnevartovsk: Nizhnevart.gos.ped.in-t, 2003. — S. 37-41.
23. Savin M.G. Kul'turon — kosmicheskii nositel' kul'tury // Chelovek. — 2002. — ¹ 5. — S. 165-172.
24. Markaryan E.S. Teoriya kul'tury i sovremennaya nauka: (logiko-metodologicheskii analiz). — M.: Mysl', 1983. — 284 s.
25. Laletin D.A. Possibil'no-deyatel'nostnyi podkhod v poznanii kul'tury / Observatoriya kul'tury. — 2011. — ¹ 2. — S.19-27
26. Tkhagapsoev Kh.G. K problemam i perspektivam razvitiya rossiiskoi kul'turologii / Voprosy kul'turologii. — 2012. — ¹ 8. — S.6-13.
27. Kul'turologiya vs filosofiya kul'tury (beseda A.S. Nilogova s V.M. Mezhuevym) // Voprosy kul'turologii. — 2015. — ¹ 4. — S. 34-38.
28. Flier A.Ya. Ponimanie istorii v kontekste kul'tury// Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie. — 2014 — ¹3 — S. 58-67.
29. Flier A.Ya. Obshchestvo kak kul'turnaya sistema [Elektronnyi resurs] // Kul'tura kul'tury. — 2015 —¹ 3. http://cult-cult.ru/society-as-a-cultural-system/ (data obrashcheniya 25. 01.2016)
30. Flier A.Ya. Evolyutsiya kul'tury kak sotsial'no-regulyativnoi sistemy // Vestnik Chelyabinskoi gosudarstvennoi akademii kul'tury i iskusstv. 2014 / 4 (40). — S.33-39
31. Aleksandrov V.B. Formy sushchestvovaniya i priroda kul'tury // Upravlencheskoe konsul'tirovanie. — 2010. — ¹ 2 (38). — S. 191-221.
32. Lapina T.S. Filosofiya kul'tury: variant ponimaniya. Monografiya. — M.: Profobrazovanie, 2003. — 255 s.
33. Motroshilova N.V. Bytie // Vvedenie v filosofiyu: ucheb. dlya vuzov / I.T. Frolov i dr. — M.: Politizdat, 1989. — Ch.2. — S. 14-48.
34. Frobenius L. Detstvo chelovechestva: Pervobytnaya kul'tura aborigenov Afriki i Ameriki. Per. s nem. Izd. 2-e. — M.: Knizhnyi dom «LIBROKOM», 2012. — 368 s.
35. Lotman Yu.M. Semiosfera. — S.-Peterburg: «Iskusstvo—SPB», 2000. — 704 s.
36. Kagan M.S. Filosofiya kul'tury. — Sankt-Peterburg, TOO TK «Petropolis», 1996. — 416 s.
37. Yarkova E.N., Larin Yu.V., Pavlov A.V. Epistemologiya kul'tury kak napravlenie issledovanii // Vestnik Tyumenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. — 2013. — ¹ 10. — S. 91-99.
38. Yarkova E.N. Istoricheskii opyt kak sotsiokul'turnyi institut // Filosofiya i obshchestvo. — 2014. — ¹ 3. — S. 67-78.
39. Knyazeva E.N., Kurkina E.S. Puti istorii i obrazy budushchego chelovechestva: sinergetika global'nykh protsessov v istorii. Chast' 1. // Filosofiya i kul'tura. — 2008. — ¹ 10. — S.28-49.
40. Knyazeva E.N., Kurkina E.S. Puti istorii i obrazy budushchego chelovechestva: sinergetika global'nykh protsessov v istorii. Chast' 2. Okonchanie. // Filosofiya i kul'tura. — 2008. — ¹ 11. — S. 31-50.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.