Статья 'Формирование понятия «мораль» в европейской философии XVII века' - журнал 'Философия и культура' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Philosophy and Culture
Reference:

Формирование понятия «мораль» в европейской философии XVII века

Sochilin Andrei

post-graduate student of the Department of Ethics at State Academic University for Humanities, ag. junior researcher at Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences, lecturer of the Department of Humanities at Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

109240, Russia, Moskovskaya oblast', g. Moscow, ul. Goncharnaya, 12, kab. 216

Andrey.Sochilin@yandex.ru
Other publications by this author
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0757.2015.11.16905

Received:

06-11-2015


Published:

17-01-2016


Abstract: The object of the research is the development history of the terms of European moral philosophy. The subject of the research is the transformation of ethical terms in the XVIIth century which started the process of formation of a modern definition of 'morals' and assimilation of traditional concepts and semantics of moral philosophy. In his research Sochilin examines theoretical, textological, historical-philosophical and institutional contexts of this process. He also describes the origin and historical dynamics of such terms as 'morals', 'ethics', 'moralitas', 'moralia', 'jus naturale', 'lex naturalis', 'honestum', 'honestas' and 'rectitudo'. The research methods include linguistic and general humanities methods such as analysis of the semantic extension of the aforesaid terms, their morphemic analysis and contextual analysis. The researcher relates these terminological transformations to conceptual changes in European moral philosophy. As a result of the research, the author clarifies etymology of the terms 'morals' and 'ethics' and compares them to their Latin and Greek originals. The author explicates similarities and differences in their origin, concludes that the term 'moralitas' has a crucial importance for the formation of today's definition of morals and describes the theoretical grounds thereto. He defines the two interdependent philosophical traditions the aforesaid process was part of (natural law tradition and Thomist tradition with primary Aristotelian ethic terminology) and outlines the scope of texts of the XVIIth century the process could be seen in. The author has also summarized historical dynamics and developed the five-level program for further research. 


References
1. Apresyan R.G. Ot «druzhby» i «lyubvi» – k «morali»: ob odnom syuzhete v istorii idei // Eticheskaya mysl'. Vyp. 1 / Pod red. A.A. Guseinova. M.: IFRAN, 2000. S. 182–194.
2. Artem'eva O.V. Formirovanie eticheskogo yazyka (na materiale novoevropeiskoi etiki) // Filosofskii zhurnal. № 2 (5). M.: IF RAN, 2010. S. 111–121.
3. MacIntyre A. After Virtue: a Study in Moral Theory. 2nd ed. Notre Dame (Indiana): Notre Dame University Press, 1984. 286 p.
4. Guseinov A.A. Etika // Etika: entsiklopedicheskii slovar' / Pod redaktsiei R.G. Apresyana i A.A. Guseinova. M.: Gardariki, 2001. S. 573–581.
5. Chernykh P.Ya. Istoriko-etimologicheskii slovar' sovremennogo russkogo yazyka. V 2 tomakh. T.1. M.: Russkii yazyk, 1999. 624 c.
6. Vdovina G.V. «Moral'noe bytie» i lingvisticheskie znaki v postsrednevekovoi skholastike // Voprosy filosofii. № 12. 2008. C. 130–141.
7. Oxford Dictionary of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010. 2110 p.
8. Sobolevskii S.I. Grammatika latinskogo yazyka. Teoreticheskaya chast': Morfologiya i sintaksis. SPb.: Universitetskaya kniga, 2009. 432c.
9. Slavyatinskaya M. N. Uchebnik drevnegrecheskogo yazyka. M.: Filomatis, 2003. 620 s.
10. Aristotle: Posterior Analytics. Topica. London: William Heinemann Ltd, 1960. 755 p.
11. Aristotel'. Sobr. soch. v 4 t. T.4. M.: Mysl', 1978. 687 s.
12. Chernykh P.Ya. Istoriko-etimologicheskii slovar' sovremennogo russkogo yazyka. V 2 tomakh. T.2. M.: Russkii yazyk, 1999. 560 c.
13. Klein E. Klein’s Comprehensive Etymological Dictionary of the English Language. Elsevier Publishing Company, 1971. 844 p.
14. Glare P.G.W. Oxford Latin Dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1968. 2126 p.
15. Borovskoi Ya.M., Boldyrev A.V. Uchebnik latinskogo yazyka dlya gumanitarnykh fakul'tetov universitetov. M.: Vysshaya shkola, 1975. 479 s.
16. Deferrari R.J., Barry, Sister M. Inviolala and McGuiness I. A Lexicon of St. Thomas Aquinas, based on The Summa Theologica and Selected Passages of His Other Works. Catholic University of America Press, 1948. 1185 p.
17. Foma Akvinskii. Summa teologii / Per. s lat. A. V. Appolonova. T. 3. M.: Signum Veritatis, 2008. 752 s.
18. Suarez F. De bonitate et malitia humanorum actuum // Suarez F. Tractatus quinque theologici ad primam secundae D. Thomae. Lugdunum: Iacobus Cardon, 1628. P. 199–327.
19. Aristotelis Ethica Nicomachea / Ed. by Ingram Bywater. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010. 280 p.
20. Aristotel'. Sobr. soch. v 4 t. T.4. M.: Mysl', 1983. 830 s.
21. Groot H. De iure belli ac pacis / Ed. B.J.A. de Kanter-van Hettinga Tromp. Leiden: E.J. Brill, 1939. 1046 p.
22. Grotsii G. O prave voiny i mira / Per. s lat. A.L. Sakketti. M.: Ladomir, 1994. 868 s.
23. Suarez F. De legibus, ac deo legislatore. Moguntia: Mylius Birckmannus, 1619. 725 p.
24. Suarez F. A Treatise on Laws and God the Lawgiver // Selections from Three Works of Francisco Suárez, S.J / The translations, prepared by Gwladys L. Williams, Ammi Brown and John Waldron, with revisions by Henry Davis. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1944. P. 3–646.
25. Irwin T. The Development of Ethics. Volume 2: From Suarez to Rousseau. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. 936 p.
26. Leibniz G. W. Sämtliche Schriften und Briefe / Ed. Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. Series six, vol. 1. Darmstadt: Otto Reichl Verlag, 1930. 593 p.
27. Du Cange et al. Glossarium mediæ et infimæ latinitatis. 10 Voll. Vol. 5. Niort: L. Favre, 1885. 659 p.
28. Tsitseron. O predelakh blaga i zla. Paradoksy stoikov / Per. s lat. N.A. Fedorova. M.: Rossiiskii Gosudarstvennyi Gumanitarnyi universitet, 2000. 474 s.
29. Cicero. De Finibus Bonorum et Malorum: Libri Quinque / D. Io. Nicolaus Madvigius recensuit et enarravit. Cambridge University Press, 2010. 869 p.
30. Goclenius R. Lexicon philosophicum. Francofurtus: Matthias Beckerus, 1613. 1143 p.
31. Aegidius de Coninck. De moralitate, natura et effectibus actuum supernaturalium in genere et fidei, spe, ac charitate, speciatim, libri quatuor. Lutetia Parisiorum: Edmundus Martinus, 1624. 597 p.
32. Korzo M. A. Pedagogicheskaya sistema iezuitov // Istoriya obrazovaniya i pedagogicheskoi mysli v epokhu Drevnosti, Srednevekov'ya i Vozrozhdeniya / Pod red. T.N.Matulisa. M.: Izd-vo Rossiiskogo universiteta druzhby narodov, 2004. S. 469–532.
33. Hochstrasser T. J. Natural Law Theories in the Early Enlightenment: Contexts and Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004. 246 p.
34. Pufendorfus S. Specimen controversarium circa jus naturale ipsi nuper motarum. Osnabrugus: Johann Georgius Schwanderus, 1678. 270 p.
35. Schneewind J. B. The Invention of Autonomy: A History of Modern Moral Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998. 652 p.
36. Darwall S. Grotius and the Creation of Modern Moral Philosophy // Darwall S. Honor, History, and Relationship: Essays in Second-Personal Ethics II. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013. P. 156–188
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.