Статья 'Фундаментальные абстракции теории креативности' - журнал 'Философия и культура' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Philosophy and Culture
Reference:

Фундаментальные абстракции теории креативности

Prokhorov Mikhail Mikhailovich

Doctor of Philosophy

Professor, the department of History, Philosophy, Pedagogy and Psychology, Nizhny Novgorod State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering; Professor, Shuya Branch of Ivanovo State University

603053, Russia, Nizhegorodskaya oblast', g. Nizhnii Novgorod, ul. Il'inskaya, 65, kab. 223

mmpro@mail.ru
Other publications by this author
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0757.2016.1.16348

Received:

09-09-2015


Published:

25-02-2016


Abstract: The article highlights three types of extreme abstraction: first, in terms of the basic forms of relations traditions and innovations; second, in the plane of man's relationship to the world; thirdly, in axiological aspect. In the foreground are identified and described anti-interactionism, reductionism and dialectical relationship of tradition and innovation; shows the presence of the growth of their interaction, given categorization of traditional and technological cultures.In a second aspect explicated abstraction contemplative, activist and co-evolutionary type of creativity. They come in a generalizing model of man's relationship with the world; dictate the nature of the very broad sense of creative activity. Traditions and traditional culture corresponds to the contemplative type of attitudes toward the world, of fabricated - an innovative form of creativity and activist type of man's relationship to the world. Dialectical relationship corresponds to a co-evolutionary model of man's attitude with the world. A contemplative and activist opposed to creative types, but have the same ontological basis of antagonism as the conflict with the dominant "struggle of opposites." The co-evolution type of creativity dominated "unity of opposites", dialog with the relationship of man and the world.In axiological terms of creativity explicated as the opposite of simulation. They are rooted in the development of reality as opposed to progress and regress. The ascending branch of the being generates creativity, as its internal determinant of ensuring its existence and prolongation; in the context of degradation, there is a degeneration of thought and creativity, creativity is simulated, it is transformed into simulation as a means and function degeneration. They are connected "law of specular": the imitation of social laws are "mirror" of their action on the ascending branch of evolution.


Keywords:

tradition and innovation, anti-interactionism, reductionism, contemplation, activism (constructivism),, co-evolution, unity of opposites, creativity, simulation, the law of specular

References
1. Prokhorov M.M. Dialektika «telesnosti» i virtual'nosti kak teoreticheskaya problema izucheniya zarodyshevykh form filosofskoi kul'tury // Fundamental'nye problemy kul'turologii v chetyrekh tomakh. T. 1. Teoriya kul'tury. SPB: Aleteiya, 2008. S. 203-214.
2. Prokhorov M.M. Filosofskie osnovaniya mirovozzreniya postneklassicheskoi epokhi. V 3 chastyakh. Ch. 1. Filosofiya osevogo vremeni. N. Novgorod: Izd-vo NF MESI, 2014. 224 s.
3. Solodukho N.M. Filosofiya nebytiya v ochen' kratkom izlozhenii // Filosofiya. Yazyk. Poznanie. Kazan': Kazan. gos. energ. un-t, 2011. 248 s.
4. Saikina G.K. Trudno byt' chelovekom… (Metafizicheskie marshruty cheloveka). Kazan': Kazan. un-t, 2012. 428 s.
5. Demenok S.L. Plameneyushchaya istina. Ot izdatelya // Khyubner B. Martin Khaidegger – oderzhimyi bytiem. SPb.: Akademiya issledovaniya kul'tury, 2011. 172 s.
6. Khyubner B. Martin Khaidegger – oderzhimyi bytiem. SPb.: Akademiya issledovaniya kul'tury, 2011. 172 s.
7. Prokhorov M.M. Smysly i tsennost' modeli otnosheniya cheloveka s mirom // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya.-2013.-№ 7.-S.136-240. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2013.7.369. URL:http://e-notabene.ru/fr/article_369.html.
8. Gegel' G.V.F. Filosofiya prava // Gegel' G.V.F. Sochineniya v XIV t. T. VII. M.-L.: Gosudarstvennoe sotsial'no-ekonomicheskoe izdatel'stvo, 1934. 380 s.
9. Gegel' G.V.F. Filosofiya istorii // Gegel' G.V.F. Sochineniya v XIV t. T. VIII. M.-L.: Gosudarstvennoe sotsial'no-ekonomicheskoe izdatel'stvo, 1935. 470 s.
10. Gegel' G.V.F. Nauka logiki: V 3 tt. T. 1. M.: Mysl', 1974. 501 s.
11. Prokhorov M.M. Tekhnologicheskaya priroda religii. Nizhnii Novgorod: VGIPU, 2010. 327 s.
12. Rozin V. Myshlenie i tvorchestvo. M.: Per Se, 2006. 360 s.
13. Epshtein M. Tekhnika – religiya – gumanistika//Voprosy filosofii. 2009. № 12. S. 19-29.
14. Berdyaev N.A. Chelovek i mashina // Voprosy filosofii. 1989. № 2. S. 147-166.
15. Shestov L. Afiny i Ierusalim // Shestov L. Sochineniya. T.1. M.: Nauka, 1993. S. 317-339.
16. Kiselev G.S. «Vtoraya Vselennaya»: drama svobody // Voprosy filosofii. 2010. № 3. S. 3–17.
17. Stepin V.S. Okkul'tizm i magiya v sovremennom mire // Magicheskii kristall: Magiya glazami uchenykh i charodeev. M.: Respublika, 1994. 527 s.
18. Losev A.F. O mirovozzrenii//Losev A.F. Derzanie dukha. M.: Politizdat, 1988. S. 313–314.
19. Tsiolkovskii K.E. Ocherki o Vselennoi. Izd-e 2-oe. Kaluga, 2001. 384 s.
20. Russkii kosmizm: Antologiya filosofskoi mysli. M.: Pedagogika-Press, 1993. 368 s.
21. Nikiforov A.L. Chto takoe «postneklassicheskaya nauka»? // Epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki. 2013. T. XXXVI. № 2. S. 59-64.
22. Prokhorov M.M. Atributivnoe opredelenie bytiya // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya.-2012.-№ 5.-S.1-100. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2012. 5.244. URL: http://e-notabene. ru/fr/article_244.html.
23. Prokhorov M.M. Istoricheskoe opredelenie bytiya // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya.-2012.-№ 2.-S.99-165. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2012. 2.189. URL: http://e-notabene.ru /fr/article_189.html.
24. Zinov'ev A.A. Faktor ponimaniya. M.: Algoritm, 2006. 528 s.
25. Prokhorov M.M. Fenomen ekonomizma // NB: Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2014.-№ 1.-S.67-78. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2014.1. 10457.URL: http://e-notabene.ru /fr/article_113.html.
26. Prokhorov M.M. Ekonomizm kak modal'nost' beschelovechnosti // Mirovozzrencheskaya paradigma v filosofii: Modusy i modal'nosti prakticheskie i teoreticheskie: Monografiya / Pod red. prof. M.M. Prokhorova. Nizhnii Novgorod: NF MESI, 2014. S. 188-210.
27. Marks K., Engel's F. Manifest Kommunisticheskoi partii // Marks K., Engel's F. Soch. T. 4. M.: Politizdat, 1955. S. 435.
28. Gurina M. Filosofiya. M.: Respublika, 1998. 540 s.
29. Voslenskii M. Nomenklatura. M.: «Zakharov», 2005. 640 s.
30. Gurevich P.S., Spirova E.M. Lichnostnyi rost: teoriya i praktika (Otchet o rabote Laboratorii lichnostnogo rosta Moskovskogo gumanitarnogo universiteta) // Pedagogika i prosveshchenie.-2011.-1.-C. 42-54.
31. Prokhorov M.M. Ontologiya: «bytie i nebytie» ili «bytie i sushchee»? // Filosofskaya mysl'.-2013.-5.-C. 1-102. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8728.2013.5.284. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_284.html
32. Mashoshina A.A. Rol' kreativnosti lichnosti v postroenii zhiznennogo puti (metodicheskie aspekty) // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika.-2014.-2.-C. 201-207. DOI: 10.7256/2070-8955.2014.2.10461.
33. Gurevich P.S. Dostoinstva i iz''yany kreativnosti v obrazovanii // Pedagogika i prosveshchenie.-2014.-4.-C. 4-7. DOI: 10.7256/2306-434X.2014.4.14160.
34. Gurevich P.S. Poet o kul'ture // Filologiya: nauchnye issledovaniya.-2013.-2.-C. 99-101. DOI: 10.7256/2305-6177.2013.2.8846.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.