Картезианство и психоанализ.

Гайнутдинов Тимур Рашидович

doi:10.7256/2454-0757.2015.2.14332


	Journal Menu > Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium


	Journals in science databases


	About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents

Philosophy and Culture

Reference:

Gaynutdinov T.R. Cartesianism and Psychoanalysis // Philosophy and Culture. 2015. № 2. P. 212-219. DOI: 10.7256/2454-0757.2015.2.14332 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=14332

Картезианство и психоанализ.

Gaynutdinov Timur Rashidovich

PhD in Philosophy

Associate Professor of the Department of Philosophy at Yaroslavl Demidov State University

150000, Russia, Yaroslavl Region, Yaroslavl, str. Sovetskaya 10, room No. 58

jean-jacques@yandex.ru

Other publications by this author

Article was published in rubric "The conscious and the unconscious"

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0757.2015.2.14332

Received:

29-01-2015

Published:

31-03-2015

Abstract: The article considers the mutual relationship between certain provisions and ideas in cartesianism and psychoanalysis. By anayzing various texts of Descartes and Freud, the author shows the influence of cartesianism on the key concepts of psychoanalysis. The article is focused on such categories as 'repression' and 'trace'. The author shows that cartesianism already deals with a completely new definition of temporalization and criticises metaphysics of presence which was further developed by psychoanalysis and deconstruction. The article refers to the structure of Cartesian discourse focusing on the metaphor of the "true path" which serves as the methodological basis and reference point of Descartes' philosophy. The philosophy of Descartes already contains the paradigmal orientation at the rejection of the definition of existence as something present. Long before Freud he showed that the trace is not only a simple investment in the project of presence but it is the structure that makes repression possible. Appealing to the phenomenon of memory in Descartes' philosophy, the author shows that the fundamental disintegration of the Cartesian subject can be already found at this level.

Keywords:

psychoanalysis, repression, trace, Derrida, Freud, Cartesianism, Descartes, memory, deconstruction, method

References

1. Lakan Zh. Obrazovanie bessoznatel'nogo (Seminary: Kniga V (1957/1958)). M.: Gnozis, Logos, 2002. S. 123.
2. Gainutdinov T. R. Kartezianskaya kupyura: problema telesnosti v filosofii Dekarta // Filosofiya i kul'tura. – 2014.-№
3. S. 329 – 338. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2014.3.10903. 3.Dekart R. Otvet na vtorye vozrazheniya protiv «Razmyshlenii o pervoi filosofii» // Sochineniya v 2 t. T. 2. M.: Mysl', 1994. S. 106.
4. Dekart R. Pravila dlya rukovodstva uma // Sochineniya v 2 t. T. 1. M.: Mysl', 1989. S. 86.
5. Dekart R. Pravila dlya rukovodstva uma // Sochineniya v 2 t. T. 1. M.: Mysl', 1989. S. 85.
6. Dekart R. Pravila dlya rukovodstva uma // Sochineniya v 2 t. T. 1. M.: Mysl', 1989. S. 86.
7. Dekart R. Pravila dlya rukovodstva uma // Sochineniya v 2 t. T. 1. M.: Mysl', 1989. S. 91.
8. Dekart R. Pravila dlya rukovodstva uma // Sochineniya v 2 t. T. 1. M.: Mysl', 1989. S. 147.
9. Dekart R. Razyskanie istiny posredstvom estestvennogo sveta // Sochineniya v 2 t. T. 1. M.: Mysl', 1989. S. 169.
10. Dekart R. Sed'mye vozrazheniya s primechaniyami avtora, ili Rassuzhdenie o pervoi filosofii // Sochineniya v 2 t. T. 2. M.: Mysl', 1994. S. 353.
11. Derrida Zh. Freid i stsena pis'ma // Pis'mo i razlichie. M.: Akademicheskii proekt, 2000. C. 319  369.
12. Dekart R. Pravila dlya rukovodstva uma // Sochineniya v 2 t. T. 1. M.: Mysl', 1989. S. 86.
13. Dekart R. Pravila dlya rukovodstva uma // Sochineniya v 2 t. T. 1. M.: Mysl', 1989. S. 91.
14. Dekart R. Strasti dushi // Sochineniya v 2 t. T. 1. M.: Mysl', 1989. S. 538.
15. Le Gerer A. Tri istorii o nose… // Aromaty i zapakhi v kul'ture. Kniga 1. M.: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2010. S. 203.
16. Freid Z. Po tu storonu printsipa udovol'stviya. // Freid Z. Psikhologiya bessoznatel'nogo: Sb. proizvedenii. M.: Prosveshchenie, 1989. S. 385.
17. Derrida Zh. Polya filosofii. M.: Akademicheskii proekt, 2012. S. 44.
18. Dekart R. Iz perepiski 1643-1649 gg. // Sochineniya v 2 t. T. 2. M.: Mysl', 1994. S. 558.
19. Kant I. Antropologiya s pragmaticheskoi tochki zreniya. SPb.: Nauka, 1999. S. 132  133.
20. Dekart R. Strasti dushi // Sochineniya v 2 t. T. 1. M.: Mysl', 1989. S. 500.
21. Dekart R. Iz perepiski 1643-1649 gg. // Sochineniya v 2 t. T. 2. M.: Mysl', 1994. S. 563.
22. Dekart R. Iz perepiski 1643-1649 gg. // Sochineniya v 2 t. T. 2. M.: Mysl', 1994. S. 564.
23. Dekart R. Pravila dlya rukovodstva uma // Sochineniya v 2 t. T. 1. M.: Mysl', 1989. S. 97, 111, 143.
24. Derrida Zh. O grammatologii. M.: Ad Marginem, 2000. – 512 s.
25. Derrida Zh. Freid i stsena pis'ma // Pis'mo i razlichie. M.: Akademicheskii proekt, 2000. C. 365.
26. Derrida Zh. Shibbolet (posvyashchaetsya Paulyu Tselanu). SPb.: Akademicheskii proekt, 2002. S. 48, 91  92.
27. Dekart R. Mir, ili traktat o svete // Sochineniya v 2 t. T. 1. M.: Mysl', 1989. S. 182.
28. Classen C. Worlds of Sense: exploring the sense in history and across cultures. L.; N.Y.: Routledge, 1993. S. 52.
29. Dekart R. Chelovek. M.: Praksis, 2012. S. 110.
30. Dekart R. Chelovek. M.: Praksis, 2012. S. 9.
31. Dekart R. Opisanie chelovecheskogo tela. Ob obrazovanii zhivotnogo. // Sochineniya v 2 t. T. 1. M.: Mysl', 1989. S. 435.
32. Dekart R. Chelovek. M.: Praksis, 2012. S. 9.
33. Dekart R. Strasti dushi // Sochineniya v 2 t. T. 1. M.: Mysl', 1989. S. 485.
34. Dekart R. Rassuzhdenie o metode, chtoby verno napravlyat' svoi razum i otyskivat' istinu v naukakh // Sochineniya v 2 t. T. 1. M.: Mysl', 1989. S. 276.
35. Ryabushkina T.M. Refleksiya kak metod samopoznaniya: k voprosu o krizise osnovanii kartezianskoi i postkartezianskikh teorii sub''ektivnosti // Filosofskaya mysl'. - 2013. - 1. - C. 1 - 59. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8728.2013.1.268. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_268.html

Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.