Статья 'Время: игра суверенности и смерти' - журнал 'Философия и культура' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Philosophy and Culture
Reference:

Время: игра суверенности и смерти

Spektor David Mikhailovich

PhD in Architecture

Docent, the department of Architecture, Moscow State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering

109451 Russia, Moscow, 3-ya Kabelnaya 1

daspektor@mail.ru
Other publications by this author
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0757.2016.1.14048

Received:

19-12-2014


Published:

25-02-2016


Abstract: This article makes an attempt to cleanse the notion of time from the naturalistic associations, which across the centuries connect it with the natural cycles on one hand, and the familiar markers of sequence (before, now, after) on the other. The “perception” of time, in the interpretations of which all the way until today, dominate the methods on introspection, is subjected to the similar criticism. The focus of examination is the conditions of origin of time and its cultural functions, which are defined first and foremost by the task of institutionalization of “reality”. The article reviews “time” in its genesis; in addition to that, it subjects to reconstruction the “historicism”’; “reduction to foundations” is carried out based on the attraction of various anthropological material. Scientific novelty consists in the reframing of the formed ideas that interpret time as a natural given. Time and its institutionalizing realities are compared with their origin – a sovereign being on one hand, and various institutions of reality (fear of death, body, ephemera, etc.) on the other. As a result, time appears as the most universal form of sublimation of the self-preservation instinct and the axis of structuring of the “real”.


References
1. Khaidegger M. Prolegomeny k istorii ponyatiya vremeni. Tomsk: Izdatel'stvo «Vodolei», 1998.— 384 s.
2. Mamardashvili M.K. Lektsii o Pruste: (Psikhologicheskaya topologiya puti). M., 1995. S. 109.
3. Marks K., Engel's F. Soch., t. 3. – M.: Gosudarstvennoe izdatel'stvo politicheskoi literatury, 1955-1981 gg.
4. Marks K., Engel's F. Izbran. soch. V 9 t. T. 2. – M., Politizdat, 1985.
5. Khaidegger M. Bytie i vremya. / Per. s nem. V.V. Bibikhina. M.: Ad marginem, 1997.
6. Gegel' G. Entsiklopediya filosofskikh nauk. T. 3. – M., 1977.
7. Gegel' G. Fenomenologiya dukha. – Sankt-Peterburg. 2002. S. 11.
8. Foucault M. L”archeologie du savoir. Paris, 1969.
9. Heidegger M. Sein und Zeit. Tübingen, 1986.
10. Fuko, Mishel'. Arkheologiya znaniya. M., Nika-Tsentr, 1996. – 208 s.
11. Fuko M. Nadzirat' i nakazyvat'. M., 1999.
12. Spektor D.M. Inobytie i vremya (kontury estetiki transtsendentnogo). // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya. — 2014.-№ 3.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.