Статья 'Индивидуализм – ценность, культивируемая культурой потребления' - журнал 'Философия и культура' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Philosophy and Culture
Reference:

Индивидуализм – ценность, культивируемая культурой потребления

Il'in Alexey Nikolaevich

PhD in Philosophy

associate professor of the Department of Practical Psychology at Omsk State Pedagogical University

644086, Russia, g. Omsk, ul. 33-1 severnaya, 122, kv. 35

ilin1983@yandex.ru
Other publications by this author
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0757.2015.7.12332

Received:

06-06-2014


Published:

05-09-2015


Abstract: In his article Ilyin critically re-evaluates individualism as the main value advertised by consumer culture. The researcher analyzes the connection between the growth of individualistic attitudes and the decline of moral values. Individualism is being viewed as themain factor of social automization and deconsolidation. The following hypothesis is being proved: 1) individualism leads to the loss of family values, solidarity, patriotism, interest towards politics and socially important issues that stand above an individual; 2) individuation is associated with the substitution of serious social issues with personal interest. The theoretical and methodological basis of the research involves recent researches of Russian scientists working in the sphere of sociocultural and cultural-philosophical approaches. Individualism is the main value of consumer culture. According to the author, the growth of individualistic practices has a destructive influence on personal and social existence. Consumer culture cannot be considered to be an affluent or morally healthy type of culture. The author of the article also touches upon the problems of the dialectics of the individual and collective in culture and postulates the principle of unity between the personal and the social. 


Keywords:

consumer culture, individualism, good morals, deconsolidation , atomization, consumer society, value, collectivism, individuation, freedom

References
1. Berdyaev N.A. O naznachenii cheloveka (Opyt paradoksal'noi etiki). – Parizh: Covremennye zapiski, 1931. – 318 s.
2. Berdyaev N.A. O rabstve i svobode cheloveka (opyt personalisticheskoi filosofii). – Parizh: Ymca-press, 1939. – 222 s.
3. Bykova D. Yu., Zotov V.V. Sotsiokul'turnyi podkhod k formirovaniyu molodezhnoi politiki innovatsionnogo obshchestva // Voprosy kul'turologii 4/2011. S. 68-73
4. Valevich E.S. Fenomen massy v perekhodnyi period obshchestvennogo razvitiya. Monografiya nakhoditsya v pechati.
5. Varava V.V. «Ya vsegda khochu nevozmozhnogo...» // Voprosy filosofii 3, 2014. S. 186-189.
6. Glinchikova A.G. Chastnaya sobstvennost' i obshchestvennyi interes-dilemma Rossii // Voprosy filosofii 3, 2011. S. 3-11.
7. Gurova O.Yu. Shoping, odezhda i tipologiya potrebitelei v Sankt-Peterburge // Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsial'noi antropologii tom XIV 5 (58), 2011. S. 129-141.
8. Zapesotskii A.S. Transformatsii kul'tury: proizvodstvo smyslov i upravlenie informatsionnymi potokami // Voprosy filosofii 5, 2011. S. 166-171.
9. Kantor V.K. Chto znachil razumnyi egoizm Chernyshevskogo v obshchinnoi strane? // Voprosy filosofii 3, 2014. S. 95-104.
10. Landau G. Antinomii organichnosti // Voprosy filosofii 3, 2011. S. 109-121, s. 117.
11. Malakhov V.A. Filosofiya i vremya: vektor soprotivleniya // Voprosy filosofii 1, 2011. S. 49-59.
12. Markov B.V. Obraz cheloveka v postantropologicheskuyu epokhu // Voprosy filosofii 2, 2011. S. 23-33.
13. Nikonov A.P. Apgreid obez'yany. Bol'shaya istoriya malen'koi singulyarnosti. – M.: Izd-vo NTs ENAS, 2005. – 352 s.
14. Nitsshe F. Volya k vlasti. Opyt pereotsenki vsekh tsennostei. / Per. s nem. E.Gertsyk i dr. – M.: Kul'turnaya Revolyutsiya, 2005. – 880 s.
15. Porus V.N. Bytie i toska: A.P. Chekhov i A.P. Platonov // Voprosy filosofii 1, 2014. S. 19-33.
16. Tikhonova N.E. Osobennosti «rossiiskikh modernistov» i perspektivy kul'turnoi dinamiki v Rossii. Stat'ya 1 // Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost' 2012, 2. S. 38-52.
17. Fuko M. Slova i veshchi. Arkheologiya gumanitarnykh nauk. – SPb.: Acad, 1994. – 408 s.
18. Khagurov T.A. Uchashchayasya molodezh' v krizisnom obshchestve // Sotsis 11, 2010. S. 93-104.
19. A.N. Fatenkov Individualizm:
po tu storonu predubezhdenii // Filosofiya i kul'tura. - 2013. - 2. - C. 163 - 170. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2013.02.4.

20. A.S. Razin, A.V. Belov Metodologicheskie osnovaniya
klassicheskoi kontseptsii
otvetstvennosti v sovremennom
sotsial'no-filosofskom znanii // Filosofiya i kul'tura. - 2011. - 12. - C. 65 - 70.

21. Bueva L.P. Massovye dukhovnye protsessy v rabotakh L. Dyumona // NB: Psikhologiya i psikhotekhnika. - 2013. - 7. - C. 77 - 134. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0425.2013.7.10422. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/psp/article_10422.html
22. G.V. Golenok Individualizm kak mifologiya // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika. - 2010. - 1. - C. 73 - 78.
23. A.A. Chuprina Filosofskii kontekst
osmysleniya sem'i kak indikatora
kul'turnogo razvitiya obshchestva // Filosofiya i kul'tura. - 2013. - 5. - C. 583 - 593. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2013.05.2.

24. R.K. Omel'chuk Tipy egoizma kak situatsii poteri very // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika. - 2011. - 5. - C. 6 - 16.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.