О некоторых вопросах ограничения оборотоспособности земель вблизи водных объектов  в целях обеспечения их экологической безопасности

Андросов Михаил Владимирович

doi:10.7256/2453-8833.2016.1.20105


	Journal Menu > Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Peer-review process > Peer-review in 24 hours: How do we do it? > Article retraction > Ethics > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Publication in 72 hours: How do we do it? > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Council of Editors > Editorial Board


	Journals in science databases


	About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!

При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.

По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents

Environmental Research

Reference:

Kruglov S.M. — On certain questions of limitation of land conveyancing next to water sources for the purpose of ensuring their environmental security // Environmental Research. – 2016. – № 1. – P. 1 - 5. DOI: 10.7256/2453-8833.2016.1.20105 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=20105

On certain questions of limitation of land conveyancing next to water sources for the purpose of ensuring their environmental security

Kruglov Sergei Mikhailovich

PhD in Economics

Deputy Director, LLC “Rhythm-K”

350007, Russia, Krasnodar, Krasnaya Street 136, office #2

niipgergo2009@mail.ru

Другие публикации этого автора

Abstract.

This article is dedicated to the examination of certain questions of limitation of land conveyancing next to water sources for the purpose of ensuring their environmental security. The author substantiates a position that changes in the current legislation of the Russian Federation and legal practice of the country’s arbitral tribunal of all levels pertaining to regulation of the problem of limitation of land conveyancing next to water sources for the purpose of ensuring their environmental security, carry an inconsistent and illogical character, which is not supported by the legal doctrine. The author suggests implementing the following measures: 1) cancel the restriction of land conveyancing, established by the Item 5.14 of the Article 27 of the Land Code of the Russian Federation; 2) introduce into the legislation provisions of the direct action of the Source Water Protection the normative definition of their boundaries, or to impose on the competent authorities the responsibility for the development and approval by a specified date project zone of protection for all water bodies to be protected; 3) abandon the provision of the Source Water Protection with regards to waters that are sources of domestic water, or provide for the immediate adoption of the appropriate sanitary rules and norms.
Keywords: conveyancing, water sources, goal, provision, environment, security, damage, Russia, limitation, questions

DOI:

10.7256/2453-8833.2016.1.20105

Article was received:

15-08-2016

Review date:

16-08-2016

Publish date:

22-08-2016

This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References

1.	O sanitarno-epidemiologicheskom blagopoluchii naseleniya: Federal'nyi zakon ot 30.03.1999 № 52-FZ // SZ RF. 1999. № 14. St. 1650.
2.	O vvedenii v deistvie Sanitarnykh pravil i norm «Zony sanitarnoi okhrany istochnikov vodosnabzheniya i vodoprovodov pit'evogo naznacheniya. SanPiN 2.1.4.1110-02»: postanovlenie Glavnogo gosudarstvennogo sanitarnogo vracha Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 14.03.2002 № 10 // Rossiiskaya gazeta. 08.05.2002.
3.	Kichigin N.V., Leont'ev A.E. Pravovoi rezhim zemel'nykh uchastkov, raspolozhennykh v granitsakh vodookhrannykh zon i pribrezhnykh zashchitnykh polos // Ekologicheskoe pravo. 2007. № 4. S. 16-20.
4.	SZ RF. 2002. № 4. St. 251.
5.	P. 23 razdela «Otvety na voprosy» Obzora sudebnoi praktiki Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii za tretii kvartal 2005 goda // Byulleten' Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii. 2006. № 3. S. 21-33.
6.	O vnesenii izmenenii v zakonodatel'nye akty Rossiiskoi federatsii v chasti utochneniya uslovii i poryadka priobreteniya prav na zemel'nye uchastki, nakhodyashchiesya v gosudarstvennoi ili munitsipal'noi sobstvennosti: Federal'nyi zakon ot 24.07.2007 № 212-FZ // SZ RF. 2007. № 31. St. 4009.
7.	O vnesenii izmenenii v stat'i 16 i 19 Vodnogo kodeksa Rossiiskoi Federatsii i stat'yu 27 Zemel'nogo kodeksa Rossiiskoi Federatsii: Federal'nyi zakon ot 19.06.2007 № 102-FZ // SZ RF. 2007. № 26. St. 3075.
8.	Gafarov S.V. K voprosu ob obespechenii bezopasnosti predprinimatel'skoi deyatel'nosti. // Politseiskaya deyatel'nost'. 2011. № 1. C. 53 - 55.
9.	Motin V.V., Trofimov O.E. Problemy obespecheniya bezopasnosti na vodnom transporte // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. 2013. № 6. C. 607 - 611. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.06.2.

Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.