Ñòàòüÿ 'Òðàíñãðåññèÿ è êóëüòóðà â "Ðîæäåíèè òðàãåäèè" Ô. Íèöøå' - æóðíàë 'Êóëüòóðà è èñêóññòâî' - NotaBene.ru
ïî
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Culture and Art
Reference:

Òðàíñãðåññèÿ è êóëüòóðà â "Ðîæäåíèè òðàãåäèè" Ô. Íèöøå

Faritov Vyacheslav Tavisovich

Doctor of Philosophy

professor of the Department of Philosophy at Ulyanovsk State Technical University

432027, Russia, Ul'yanovskaya oblast', g. Ul'yanovsk, ul. Severnyi Venets, 32

vfar@mail.ru
Other publications by this author
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0625.2016.1.16935

Received:

09-11-2015


Published:

02-02-2016


Abstract: The subject of the present article is the phenomenon of transgression in the first philosophical work of Friedrich Nietzsche - "The Birth of Tragedy". The author investigates the ontological aspects of such basic concepts of the teaching of young Nietzsche as Dionysian and Apollonian beginnings. The author of the article explicates the ontological content of the phenomena of culture, art and science in the interpretation of Nietzsche. He also reveals the place and role of the phenomenon of transgression in the being of culture and existence of human. The author also conducts a comparative analysis of certain provisions of "The Birth of Tragedy" with the ideas of Georg Hegel and Mikhail Bakhtin. In his research Faritov has used research methods adopted from contemporary non-classical philosophy and social sciences. Partially he has applied the methodological principles of Jungian paradigm. The main conclusion of the research is the thesis about the subordinate position of the Dionysian transgression to Apollonian beginning in art and culture. The author proves the thesis that young Nietzsche did not unequivocally state the priority of the Dionysian to the Apollonian. In his "The Birth of Tragedy" Nietzsche speaks as a philosopher of culture and art, and the Dionysian beginning is admitted as much as it can be transformed by the enlightening force of Apollonian art images and thus integrated into the culture.


References
1. Jenks Ch. Transgression / Ch. Jenks. – London; New York: Routledge, 2003. – vii+205 p.
2. Zherebin A.I. Zagadka velikogo razryva. K antropologii dekadansa v knige Nitsshe «Chelovecheskoe, slishkom chelovecheskoe» // Voprosy filosofii. – 2015. – ¹ 2. – S. 162-168.
3. Podoroga V. Vyrazhenie i smysl. Landshaftnye miry filosofii: Seren Kirkegor, Fridrikh Nitsshe, Martin Khaidegger, Marsel' Prust, Frants Kafka / V. Podoroga. M.: Ad Marginem, 1995. – 427 s.
4. Faritov V.T. Perspektivizm Nitsshe, filosofskaya teoriya diskursa i transgressiya // Filosofiya i kul'tura. – 2015. – ¹ 7. – S.962-968. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2015.7.14895
5. Nitsshe F. Rozhdenie tragedii // Polnoe sobranie sochinenii: V 13 tomakh. T. 1/1: Rozhdenie tragedii. Iz naslediya 1869-1873 godov / F. Nitsshe. – M.: Kul'turnaya revolyutsiya, 2012. – S. 7-145.
6. Nietzsche F. Die Geburt der Tragödie // Digitale Kritische Gesamtausgabe Werke und Brief [Elektronnyi resurs]: Nietzsche Source. URL: http://www.nietzschesource.org/#eKGWB/NF-1886,7 (data obrashcheniya: 26.10.15)
7. Yung K.G. Votan // Bozhestvennyi rebenok / K.G. Yung. – M.: Olimp, 1997. – 400 s.
8. Sloterdaik P. Myslitel' na stsene. Materializm Nitsshe // Rozhdenie tragedii / F. Nitsshe. – M.: Ad Marginem, 2001. – S. 547-724.
9. Shopengauer A. Mir kak volya i predstavlenie / A. Shopengauer. – Minsk: OOO «Popurri», 1998. – T. 1-2. – 688+832 s.
10. Gegel' G.V.F. Nauka logiki / G.F.V. Gegel'. – SPb.: Nauka, 2005. – 800 s.
11. Duden Deutsshes Universalwörtebuch / hrsg. und bearb. vom Wissenschaftlichen Rat und den Mitarbeitern der Dudenredaktion. – Mannheim; Leipzig; Wien; Zürich; Dudenverl., 1996.
12. Khaidegger M. Bytie i vremya / M. Khaidegger. – Khar'kov: «Folio», 2003. – 503 s.
13. Nitsshe F. Ob istine i lzhi vo vnenravstvennom smysle // Polnoe sobranie sochinenii: V 13 tomakh. T. 1/2: Nesvoevremennye razmyshleniya. Iz naslediya 1872-1873 gg. / F. Nitsshe. – M.: Kul'turnaya revolyutsiya, 2013. – S. 433-449.
14. Nitsshe F. Chernoviki i nabroski 1887-1889 gg. // Polnoe sobranie sochinenii: V 13 tomakh. T. 13 / F. Nitsshe. – M.: Kul'turnaya revolyutsiya, 2006. – 688 s.
15. Gegel' G.V.F. Estetika: V 2 t. T. II / G.F.V. Gegel'. – SPb.: Nauka, 2007. – 604 s.
16. Gaim R. Gegel' i ego vremya / R. Gaim. – SPb.: Nauka, 2006. – 394 s.
17. Gegel' G.V.F. Estetika: V 2 t. T. I / G.F.V. Gegel'. – SPb.: Nauka, 2007. – 623 s.
18. Batai Zh. Proklyataya chast'. Sakral'naya sotsiologiya / Zh. Batai. – M.: Ladomir, 2006. – 742 s.
19. Yung K.G. Psikhologiya bessoznatel'nogo / K.G. Yung. – M.: AST; Kanon+, 2001. – 400 s.
20. Yung K.G. Psikhologicheskie tipy / K.G. Yung. – M.: Olimp; AST, 1998. – 720 s.
21. Mochkin A.N. Mif i politika v «Rozhdenii tragedii» F. Nitsshe / Filosofiya i kul'tura. – 2015.– ¹ 7 (91). – S. 1017-1028. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2015.7.13068
22. Nitsshe F. Tak govoril Zaratustra. Kniga dlya vsekh i ni dlya kogo // Polnoe sobranie sochinenii: V 13 tomakh. T. 4: Tak govoril Zaratustra. Kniga dlya vsekh i ni dlya kogo / F. Nitsshe. – M.: Kul'turnaya revolyutsiya, 2007. – 432 s.
23. Nitsshe F. Dionisiiskoe mirovozzrenie // Polnoe sobranie sochinenii: V 13 tomakh. T. 1/1: Rozhdenie tragedii. Iz naslediya 1869-1873 godov / F. Nitsshe. – M.: Kul'turnaya revolyutsiya, 2012. – S. 201-227.
24. Bakhtin M. Problemy poetiki Dostoevskogo / M. Bakhtin. – M.: Sovetskaya Rossiya, 1979. – 320 s.
25. Nitsshe F. Pis'ma / Sost. I.A. Ebanoidze. – M.: Kul'turnaya revolyutsiya, 2007. – 400 s.
26. Ivanov V.I. Nitsshe i Dionis // Nitsshe: pro et contra / Sost. Yu.V. Sineokaya. – SPb.: RKhGI, 2001. – S. 794-805.
27. Faritov V.T. Transgressiya v filosofii Gegelya: ot Gegelya k Nitsshe // Filosofiya i kul'tura. - 2015. - 6. - C. 818 - 829. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2015.6.15303.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.